Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members

But 4 year deals are standard in soaps

However Sean Ringgold has a one year deal with PP to Play Shawn On OLTL

also as far as Stause Goes she has wanted off AMC for two years and only stayed cause she was recuring

Amanda can be recast

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Because they're just a start up company trying to do something completely new and have nothing to offer but promises. When they have something to point to as a success then fine but for now I see no reason why an actor who has just come off of the AMC roller coaster (which was also full of promises) would want to tie themselves up for four years of exclusivity. Four years with the option to work other projects? fine. Four years exclusive to HBO? Fine. Four years on the PP fantasy online plantation? Hell no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well why would anyone sign any kind of long term contract withouth guaranteed airtime. Wasn't that the only way PP could meet the current contract rates was to basically take away the minimums?

I really don't get why its so outlandish for some of these actors especially younger ones would not want to sign on for that duration. And contracts as always are to protect the show as they have been on soaps since actors can be let go at 13-26 week increments but the actor can't walk.

As for recasting ANYONE CAN BE aside from Erica Kane and some of the older vets. Jamey at DC actually said something I agree with for a change that these shows should move on if an actor passes and forge ahead. Read the bibles for these shows and figure out where you can rebuild and improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm not saying it's outlandish. I'm saying Hollywood is a notoriously difficult place to make your way. If someone is offering you the same money you were making on soaps, I'd say that's nothing to sneeze at. A couple of 100k a year, versus working the audition circuit. Seems like a no brainer to me, but sure, some of these people probably still think they can make it big. As I said, good luck to them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Acting jobs are always hard to come by. Nobody becomes an actor because they want financial security. Soaps were unusual that way and those days are over. And all that "money" isn't going to mean anything if the company folds in six months. These people don't even have a website. When are these actors going to see this money anyway? When they start production? So far we've gone from promises that they were going to start production right after AMC ended to they're going to start production in November to they're going to concentrate on OLTL and not AMC and they're still trying to make a deal with the union. And these actors - some of whom actually have done better - are supposed to lock themselves down for the soap equivalent of Pets.com? Nope. Contract? Yes. Exclusive contract? No.

I don't think it's about "making it big." It's about not tying yourself down to a loser.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If an actor really wants out of his or her contract, there are ways to make that happen, especially if they are lingering on the vine and not driving story. If David Fumero, or Jill Larson, or Shenell Edmonds wanted out of their contracts, do you really think they would get a fight? Honestly, I get why any of these folks would sign on for four years as easily as I get why they wouldn't. A bird in the hand... and when you're in the business and you see the reality of the game and you know you're not getting any younger and you're happy with your career, the money you're making, your life, staying with the soap even in this new unproven form still makes sense to me. I get it. And this may sound jerky, but I wouldn't doubt that somewhere in the back (or front) of these people's minds is the notion that this may fail hard sooner rather than later and at least they made that paper while they still could.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's true. Some people might be signing four year contracts but not...really.

To put it as plainly as possible, some of these people have options and others don't. Chrishell is still young and her boobs are still perky. She can still take risks with her career. Erika Slezak not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And just like in relationships, I think a lot of actors learn to *settle*. Which really isn't all that sad and defeatist as it sounds. It's like an actor who dreamed of being a Broadway star but things didn't quite work out in New York, yet they became huge fish in D.C. or Chicago.

This is true.[/Mabel Thomas]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy