Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Yes During The Original Airing back in 1991-92, that's actually Prime Time Here, or used to be, It Aired After Manchete's Main Telenovela at the Time, I Have The feeling That The Unpopularity of "Amazonia" Contributed to the Low Ratings B&B got here though, as For The Second Airing on Rede Baideirantes in 1999 it Aired On the Afternoon, at 3 P.M., As shown on The 3rd Vid, Unfortunately it only lasted 4 months there

  • Replies 7.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted (edited)

watching now Jessica and Dylan i remember that i must have been around 18 when i first saw these episodes and the story seemed to me very real. A girl falls in love with a boy, the boy has a crush on another more popular girl lol. BTW i was not popular at all a lot like Jessica.

Edited by Marquise
  • Members
Posted

The Dylan Jessica story is cliche after cliche after cliche... and the melodrama is unbearable. I miss the old days with Stephanies sarcasm and Brooke in the hotseat every time she went into the Forrester mansion. I miss how intelligent Taylor was written and how creepy Sheila was... Im watching 1891 and its just... another show... I had hope that it would stay good since it was still good after Brooke took over the company... but lately it has been so much boring SLOW scenes... so much storylines with NO focus.. it seems like everything is going with that Bradley Bell turtle speed. When is the show going to get better? Someone said.. in 1997... I hope not. 

  • Members
Posted

Gee I Don't know, that's all I've ever got of the 1999 Airing, the Original One By Promos I could distinguish they began showing from the beginning, but on The 1999 Showing That vid is all I've ever been able to see. 

  • Members
Posted

In that case I get why you could relate to her. For me Dylan and Jessica were the standard teen pairing on soaps which equals to fast forward material...

Please register in order to view this content

 One of the few exception were the original Amber years and the Glo by Jabot kids on Y&R. I can't think of any other teen set I ever liked. And with Jessica I have ZERO hopes that I will find her more interesting than in the first run. It's amazing that Dylan Neal made a serious career after this role: he was super handsome and had charisma but he could not elevate the material back then and for me Dylan and Jessica were just okay as a couple. And the many scenes with Stephanie and Eric were so cringe-worthy - and it got even more ridiculous when John Forrester was never shown and Maggie (who showed up 11 months later) was well Maggie.

  • Members
Posted

What I find absolutely astounding is the huge deal Stephanie and Eric are making about Jessica and Dylan having sex. They talk as if Jessica is about to ruin her entire life, get pregnant, drop out of school and so on, when in fact she is being very responsible and using protection. Maybe it's a cultural difference between the US and Europe because for me this whole storyline feels like something out of a different time (1890s rather than 1990s).

  • Members
Posted

Now we can watch It First Hand, Katie Reduced to A Mere Plot Device, I Felt So Sorry for Nancy Sloan, spending nearly 10 years like The Live In Nanny. I Mean Couldn't they think of something to do with her? A Romance, a simple storyline, a career, I'm prett sure it would've been a welcome change in a show that constantly recycled the same stories and Had To do a Super SORAS on Brooke's Kids to add drama! Not saying she was super talented but then most actors on the show weren't, i believe i saw her on DOOL and she did a pretty decent job.

Please register in order to view this content

BTW This had me Thinking, By 2008 All Logans BUT Brooke were Recast,  This meant a lot of DESoras on them including Brooke! Let's see Sloan is from 1965 and Katie was initially 16, Tom is 10 years younger i feel her Katie is from Around '77? DeVry is from '68, Storm was initially the oldest, not sure about this one, Carrie Mitchum is from 1965, Donna was Initially 18, I feel Gareis was given around the same age, but more recently i feel like they have her as being from 1972, on Beth Logan has Baldwin was from 43, Burnett from 46 and Riker from 52 that makes Both Beth and Brooke Considerably Younger, and P. Duffy as Steven Too, it's quite interesting

  • Members
Posted

Let me say it. It's episode 1928 and Taylor is getting married to Omar. Let me say that it is official. The show has turned from a diamond to utter trash. It is basically unbearable to watch. I am praying for a change soon.

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Fall 1994, aftermath of OJ plus Reilly's Days was about to blow up. B&B starts tanking in the second half of 1995.

Yeah, we can really see the difference between Bill Bell's masterpiece of 1987-1993 and Bradley who did not inherit his father's talent.

Edited by kalbir
  • Members
Posted

I always figured 1994 wasn’t nearly as strong as 1993, but it’s interesting that everyone on here notices the dip in quality compared to Bill and Bradley’s writing. I guess 94-97 seems better in hindsight compared to how messy everything on the show seems now. I do wonder if Thudley really was inspired by the likes of JER and the other more outlandish soap writers. 
 

1995 definitely seems a step up to 1994. I can’t honestly say I know a whole lot of what happen during 96-97 other then Brooke losing her mind and the dolls. 

  • Members
Posted

And in late 95 they teased Eric/Taylor. That woman literally tried to sleep her way through many families as Brooke has yet is still regarded as a “saint”

  • Members
Posted

I've said this numerous times, but to me the real proof that Bradley did not inherit his father's talent was when we were denied a Stephanie and Victor scene during the Jabot/Newman/Forrester crossover storyline. You know Bill Bell would have given us a scene of two of his greatest creations together. I recall an interview w/ Susan Flannery from the early 2000s where she even said it was a missed opportunity that Stephanie and Victor didn't interact during that storyline. I wish I could find that interview but no luck.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • Seeing Peter Bergman (Jack) and Melody Thomas Scott (Nikki) act opposite each other really makes me mad that their short-lived reunion in 2012 was just that... short-lived. I've always loved the Jack/Nikki pairing.
    • No.  I recall there was also a mention about how distracting it was EOB's Gwen wasn't wearing nail polish as well.  That it was someone's pet peeve. And, yes, the fact characters can have a manicure in prison is the wildest continuity issue here.
    • Can anyone remember Mary Ellen Stuart's run as Jenny? I'm trying to fill in the cracks for missing stuff that we overlooked.  Bulletpoints:  * Dated Ross * Rusty's police partner * Directly responsible for Dinah coming forward about George Stewart (Cam's father)
    • But that's not weird... nail polish is allowed in prisons via commissary. Same with general makeup, haircuts, and hair colouring products.
    • This is DAYS, the show that said you could brainwash anyone with simple kitchen appliances.  An actor's nail polish or lack thereof should be the least of our concerns, lol.
    • It was not that she wasn't wearing nail polish, it is that she managed to get a manicure in prison
    • "We're Knot Done Yet": the name of this lovely podcast AND what JVA tells her plastic surgeon at every appointment. In other news, Michele Lee is reminding me more and more of my old music teacher from elementary school, and I couldn't STAND that bitch.
    • I apologize if this has been covered already, but does anyone know whether Douglas Marland was HW'ing by that point?  If he was, then I see what he meant when he said (in so many words) that he had inherited a mess when he started at GH.  Aside from Alan and Monica, none of that material seems very promising.  The story with Mark Dante and the Corbins is the wrong kind of predictable (y'know, the kind where you know what's going to happen, but you just don't give a crap?), the stuff with Scotty and Laura is cute but toothless, I don't know WHAT the hell Gina and Steve Carlson's character are arguing about and Rick Webber has to be the dumbest man alive not to see David Hamilton twirling his invisible moustache over how to make a killing off Lamont Corbin's declining health.  (By the way, "LAMONT CORBIN"?  What is this, "The Shadow"?  And "Corbin Limited" sounds like some jive I'd hear over on Y&R.) In a way, it's kind of like watching today's GH, right down to the dialogue that's serviceable and pushes plot along but says nothing about the characters' inner lives.
    • It absolutely was; the narrative was there, and they followed it promptly. Maybe that's back when women had babies at young ages?!?!?
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy