Jump to content

AMC: Lorraine Broderick named Headwriter


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 580
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Administrator

Don't be so hung up on "multi-year" - it means nothing. It's there for the networks in case they want to keep the HW - so the HW can't leave until the contract is over. But if the network wants to get rid of the HW, even with with a multi-year contract, they just wait until the end of the contract cycle. Unless of course you sign an ironclad contract, like Jim Reilly's with DAYS/NBC in 2003, where he would get paid for 6 years even if he was fired. And those contracts rarely given.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know it means nothing. But it's one thing to have it written and one thing for a spokesperson to verbally say it. If it's not written, then that spokesperson in Logan's column was merely giving him lip service. I'm a little concerned that she was just appointed to write only the last few months of the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Frons is a soap hating COWARD, he would rather laugh at all his suffering employees and let them go on day by day wondering then MAN up and say what is going on but then again he is not a man, he is a coward with no heart or soul

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Michael Logan: Someone had to take over and Broderick [...] is an ideal choice to wrap things up.

Well, maybe. Not disputing that. But, OTOH, why bother hiring a new HW, even one who's on-staff already, just to write it off into the sunset? True, Dave and Donna's contracts were up, but if AMC is marked for death w/ no chance at all for reprieve, why not just extend their contracts to the finale and let them write it? Hiring Broderick to oversee the ending of this show is a sentimental move, at best, and something that history says Frons is incapable of making. As always, I'm just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The release says nothing about multi-year. It IMO would have meant something not in terms of actual time BUT in terms of trying to tell fans "look, it's multi year" instead of the long cycle of neither confirming or denying the cancelation rumors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy