Jump to content

December 6-10, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

If you're going to copy/paste, please link. Thank you.

Numbers are based on Live+Same Day ratings

Ratings for the week December 6-10, 2010

Total Viewers

1. Y&R 4,934,000 (-118,000/-175,000)

2. B&B 2,996,000 (-75,000/-363,000)

3. DAYS 2,607,000 (+27,000/-514,000)

4. GH 2,371,000 (-129,000/-235,000)

5. OLTL 2,321,000 (-28,000/-132,000)

6. AMC 2,290,000 (-11,000/-373,000)

HH

1. Y&R 3.5/12 (same/-.2)

2. B&B 2.1/7 (-.1/-.3) <- ties low rating (Last time: November 22-26, 2010)

3. DAYS 1.9/6 (same/-.3)

4. AMC 1.8/6 (same/-.2)

4. GH 1.8/5 (same/-.1)

4. OLTL 1.8/6 (same/same)

Women 18-49 Viewers

1. Y&R 1,096,000 (+3,000/-92,000)

2. DAYS 742,000 (-3,000/-109,000)

3. GH 688,000 (-81,000/-160,000)

4. B&B 651,000 (-30,000/-71,000)

5. OLTL 572,000 (-38,000/-55,000) <- new low (Previous low: 600,000 for April 12-16, 2010)

6. AMC 544,000 (+1,000/-116,000)

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.7/11 (same/-.1)

2. DAYS 1.1/7 (same/-.2)

3. B&B 1.0/6 (same/-.1)

3. GH 1.0/6 (-.2/-.3) <- ties low rating (Last time: October 25-29, 2010)

5. OLTL 0.9/6 (same/same) <- ties low rating (3rd straight week)

6. AMC 0.8/5 (same/-.2) <- ties low rating (2nd straight week)

Girls 12-17 Viewers

1. Y&R 29,000 (+4,000/+7,000)

2. GH 21,000 (-1,000/-21,000)

3. DAYS 19,000 (-6,000/-18,000)

4. AMC 17,000 (+5,000/+7,000)

5. B&B 15,000 (+1,000/-12,000)

6. OLTL 12,000 (same/-9,000)

Women 18-34 Rating

1. Y&R 0.9/7 (-.2/-.2)

2. DAYS 0.7/5 (same/-.3)

2. GH 0.7/4 (same/-.3)

4. AMC 0.6/4 (+.1/-.2)

4. OLTL 0.6/4 (+.1/-.2)

4. B&B 0.6/4 (same/same)

Men 18+ Viewers

1. Y&R 1,242,000 (-17,000/-20,000)

2. B&B 685,000 (+3,000/-59,000)

3. DAYS 621,000 (+22,000/-40,000)

4. OLTL 435,000 (+9,000/-82,000)

5. GH 432,000 (-60,000/-79,000)

6. AMC 431,000 (-17,000/-165,000)

-------------------------------------

Day-To-Day Ratings - HH/Total Viewers

AMC

Monday: 1.8/2,386,000

Tuesday: 1.6/2,170,000

Wednesday: 1.7/2,220,000

Thursday: 1.9/2,430,000

Friday: 1.7/2,246,000

B&B

Monday: 2.2/3,176,000

Tuesday: 2.3/3,377,000

Wednesday: 2.0/2,763,000

Thursday: 2.0/2,804,000

Friday: 2.1/2,860,000

DAYS

Monday: 2.0/2,683,000

Tuesday: 2.0/2,740,000

Wednesday: 2.0/2,723,000

Thursday: 1.9/2,514,000

Friday: 1.8/2,452,000

GH

Monday: 1.8/2,522,000

Tuesday: 1.8/2,364,000

Wednesday: 1.8/2,341,000

Thursday: 1.8/2,402,000

Friday: 1.7/2,226,000

OLTL

Monday: 1.7/2,228,000

Tuesday: 1.7/2,342,000

Wednesday: 1.8/2,375,000

Thursday: 1.8/2,322,000

Friday: 1.7/2,352,000

Y&R

Monday: 3.5/4,988,000

Tuesday: 3.5/5,123,000

Wednesday: 3.4/4,836,000

Thursday: 3.5/4,888,000

Friday: 3.4/4,835,000

----------------------

For the SEASON September 20, 2010 through December 12, 2010

HH

1. Y&R 3.6

2. B&B 2.3

3. GH 2.0

4. DAYS 1.9

5. AMC 1.8

5. OLTL 1.8

Women 18-49 Rating

1. Y&R 1.7

2. GH 1.4

3. DAYS 1.2

4. B&B 1.0

4. OLTL 1.0

6. AMC 0.9

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Fearless Predictions:

-People will wonder why Y&R is still #1 even though it's utter crap.

-Long-winded, lame posts about how daytime as a whole is dying.

-More bickering among AMC/OLTL/GH fans about which show is better and which one will survive cancellation.

-More waxing poetic about "The Good Ole Days"

-More "ATWT was canceled for The Talk!?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm still baffled as to why folks believe quality really has that much bearing on ratings. It's why these "OLTL is the best soap on TV I don't know why it's ratings haven't gone up" and ""Y&R sucks why are people watching this dreck" posts always amuse me. Unless you see gradual sustained growth or decline, an up week here or there or down week here or there doesn't really matter in the whole scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There have been some fantastic shows over the years that have been cancelled because the ratings were just not there. Then there are shows that have great ratings as while the show may be pure crap to some, they give it's fans what they want (such as skin, sin, etc). Then there are those that find the right fit and have both.

To me, ratings does not necessarily = quality but we know it's the current measure used to determine if a show remains on the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

+1

And as long as we misanthropes seem to be firing the first shots this week let me add my pet peeve...

"[Title of show] is ON FIRE RIGHT NOW!"

FFS, what is that supposed to mean?!?! <end Lewis Black> (Although to be fair, the soap press is just as guilty of that as posters.)

The irony about that declaration - other than its emptiness - is that it's practically a curse. As soon as people declare a show to be on fire, you can start the countdown to the backlash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do think she's been pretty wrecked, having tried to kill someone in cold blood, letting her whole family (including the woman pregnant with her great-grandchild) get charged or questioned, and having no remorse, but it doesn't matter as much because Kathy has not existed as a character since Gillian's return anyway.  There are reasons to bring Max back, like Lauren and his not knowing he had a child with Linda, but he is exhausted, with Jake Wood phoning it in years before he left.  I am a little surprised about Zoe because Michelle Ryan said for years she didn't want to return, to the point of even asking the show to recast the role, but I guess this may only be a short stint. I wouldn't be shocked if they kill Zoe off.
    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy