Jump to content

November 22-26, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I get the feeling that CBS is more aiming their press releases at investors and business-media outlets such as Bloomberg than the other networks because good news like this actually impacts stock price. ABC and NBC are only tiny parts of their repective parent companies; however, when CBS does something such as revamp The Early Show, stock moves upwards. CBS wants to mention the company-owned affiliates because, here again, this comes down to bottom line profit. I dispise The Talk but this show looks like a cash cow.

Yes, there is certainly a lot of spin here but it's good news like this that has CBS stock price up 16 percent for the year. All press releases are spun but, if they were to to do anything less, these executives wouldn't be doing their job. The goal is to highlight bright spots while deflecting attention away from areas of weakness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I have to comment or maybe ask a question. I keep hearing or reading here how a show like Y&R is happy to be number 1 and GH is happy to be number 2 in demos etc. But what I read in publications like advertising age or even on the TV By the Numbers site is that placement really doesn't matter. This continues to be highlighted especially on TVBYTHENUMBERS when the Leno fans continue to crow about how Leno is beating Letterman even though the numbers are down from last year. They continue to point out placement means nothing except for PR purposes that advertisers don't care if someone is number 1 or number 3 as long as their demographic hits a specific target as promised or negotiated. So why is it the there is such a focus on placement here when a lot of these shows are not even in head to head competition - lets not talk about the fact that the demos for all the shows barring perhaps Y&R really are not that great. Is there something differnt analyzed when it comes to soaps that perhaps does not apply to the rest of network television? Just curious and I have wanted to ask this question for ages.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My dislike of LnL is legend and loud, but I think it also has to be acknowledged that the LnL fanbase thinks the are OWED and that everything is a slap in their face. I don't blame Guza and co for telling them to get over themselves.

My questions is about Days, why - considering it was the only one to show a new episode on Black Friday - are they not being considered part of the ratings for the week? That seems extremely odd to me. Do the other shows influence what can be included and what not? Or conversely why would Days not want an episode that ranked 2nd highest that week to be counted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care about LnL at all. What I do take exception to is both actors, TG and GF, whining incessently in the press about their issues as if the problem is with the fans or the show not them. GF and her repeated comments about not being invited back to GH on a more permanent basis and how she doesn't get it and TG and him feeling he has the right to tell fans to get over it regarding LnL. Neither of these actors constitute the level of entitlement that comes across in the interviews they've given in the past. I don't care how iconic TG or GH thinks he is fact is TG hasn't been able to successfully do anything outside of Luke Spencer on GH and GF while whe's actually had some successful runs on other soaps, hasn't been a breakout star either. TG always to me comes across as resentful of the box he's been placed in in terms of his career and GF, well she has her own issues. I just hate it when actors blame the fans or others for issues they themselves have. Believe it or not fans and the shows have the right to decide for themselves what they like or what is best and any actor can STFU about it. Annoys the heck out of me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I dont' know much about what is said in the press I'm a huge fan of Genie Francis and don't ship couples much because I just go with the actor's characters...whomever they can get a story with I'm good especially the vets since I'm a huge fan of vintage GH.

But if I had my way I would have went with Stefan Cassadine as for what she's whined about in the press I've gone to a few of her events and she responded to questions re: when is she coming back to GH and as recent as May 2010 when she was asked that question she said "they haven't asked me." I did read an executive producer said something about her weight and there is no audience for her whether that is true who knows also I saw her on "The View" where she spoke her mind I don't consider that whining...

However a question I've seen frequently asked that she responds to is when is she returning to GH. Heaven forbid she would seek a contract for herself like Ingo, Tony or Kelly did where she too can get outs because rumor has it that's all she wanted and they refused. So I really wouldn't know unless I'm in the room.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ranking probably matters to a certain small extent but a lot of this has to do with bragging rights. Press releases are like a never ending pissing contest. In primetime, 30 Rock might be a good example in that it as never been a hit on par with a show like Friends but I've read it reaches the wealthy 'BMW Demo'. The goal seems to be hitting various particular niche demos as viewership continues to fragment. Strategy also varies depending on network. Mooves is less demo-centric and looking for cash cows with broad appeal. Zucker recently spoke about how he failed with his NBC stategy developed by Ben Silverman of keeping costs low while treating broadcast too much like cable. I've yet to read too much about ABC aside from Disney wanting to run. The same vision should apply to both primetime and daytime; however, with daytime's depressed viewing levels, it seems to me that all networks have chosen to settle with Fox not even really involved.

I still think the situation for CBS is slightly different in that the flagship network brings in the majority of corporate profit. With NBCU, NBC only brings in 5% of total earnings so the typical investor might not be all that interested in the performance of network-owned affiliates. A Disney investor will certainly look at the profits coming from theme parks long before soap ratings. Really, it is quarterly profits of a particular division that matter far more than bragging rights or rating's crowns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

GF Wanted The Same Contract That TG Has and Thats why she left in 2002. She Didnt Feel GH Valued Her As Much As They Do TG & They Should. Its Because Of Both GF and TG That GH Still Exists. If It Wasnt for Their Popularity, GH Wouldnt Have Survived Past 1978

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't begrudge any actress leaving for this reason but it was her choice and I don't think it's any secret how the entertainment industry treats actresses versus actors. It's not right that's no secret. VM also wanted some latitude in her contract which at the time the show was unwilling to do so she left. The difference is I didn't read about VM complaining continually and if GF hasn't I apologize.

I'm not discounting the contributions GF or TG made to GH over the years but they were paid for their work were they not. Both left the show at varying times over their careers by their choice and I don't believe anyone holds that against them. If the show doesn't feel that the couple fits on the show or both don't fit that's their choice they set the show direction not the fans or the actors. And no I don't find it professional for actors to periodically continue to have to dish the show or fans nor would it be appropriate for the show to dish them, which while GH hasn't actively pursued GF, I've never read one ounce of disrespect for her in print. And in all her visits back, she's been treated gracefully and with respect for the most part.

As for TG, he has whined about the fans and their refusal to let LnL go. Well how horrible it must be to be associated to a soap pairing that became a pop icon and made him who he is and how dare the pairing still have fans who love them. No one thinks his character should be held in some sort of box mourning for his true love endlessly. That doesn't even make sense on a soap opera, but he should be grateful and appreciative to all his fans, not just those he deems viable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And here I thought I'd never think about Lauren Tewes again after her brief appearance in Twin Peaks Season 3.
    • I may be the single person who does not mind Transatlantic Campy Pamela. I think it perfectly suits this sort of Absolutely Fabulous-esque supporting character she's playing much more than it did when Cady tried weird and often broad stuff at AMC* or Y&R, or later stints at ATWT. She's not Dixie and she's not trying to be. I will freely admit some of the other chances she took at other shows often came off stiff, hammy or downright mortifying (Kelly Andrews, come on down). (* - and I say that as one of the few who was somewhat into Cady trying to make Dixie more cosmopolitan in the Rosanna Cabot mold in mid-2000s AMC, just to liven the character up again)
    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy