Jump to content

ABC to remake "Incredible Hulk"


DRW50

Recommended Posts

  • Members

So, not only are we getting another remake, but the man who executive produced the dismal flop that was the Bionic Woman remake (and I believe even bragged about never having seen the original version), is going to help create this too. What can you say about network TV? Let's have someone who has already proven that they can't remake classic TV shows remake another one! I guess the networks just can't resist handing job after job to the more ponderous than thou BSG group, even though their track record has been poor on just about everything outside of BSG. I wish they could just go create some depressed, darkly lit, navel-gazing version of Qwark or something...

http://www.deadline.com/2010/11/guillermo-del-toro-and-david-eick-to-create-new-hulk-television-series-for-abc/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 25
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

With some of the people they've hired, I don't know. There were some very negative comments at Deadline from some posters who have worked with Eick, and he was just terrible on Bionic Woman, it really was a lousy show in just about every way, and that comes from the top.

I will be surprised if any of these shows are a success. Remaking Charlie's Angels? Why? Considering how misogynist the media is today, they will probably make the old show seem like Gloria Steinem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

^^Nice. ^_^

When I saw only half of this thread title on the main page ("ABC to remake Incredible..."), for some reason my mind went to "Amazing Stories". I was prepared to semi-sh!t on that idea, "Certain shows just had their moment, if you can't really do it better, try smething new, enough with the remakes", but wow, yet another Incredible Hulk? I really spoke too soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's ridiculous. They did two poorly-received movies, might as well follow it up with a no doubt poorly-received TV series. I'm sick and tired of this "Oh yeah, man, we're gonna redo the theme song and include those iconic catchphrases, it's gonna be just like the original, just a little updated." Bullshit.

And I don't have anything against remakes, really. I just hate half-ass remakes that are crappy shows using a popular/beloved title and cast of characters to hook audiences into watching. At least 90210 had the sense to cut ties with the original and own that.

And those annual rumblings of a CA remake always frighten me because they don't make shows like CA anymore (and I mean that -- they don't make those types of detective shows anymore, at all), and shoehorning lame comedy and lame story arcs into it will render it unCA. Look at Hawaii Five-0. It annoys me that they considered updating the theme song more important than paying attention to the actual theme/tone/feel of the show. McGarrett and Danny should not be randomly playing basketball with DL Hughley for five minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This will be a disaster, I'm sure. The only reboot TV shows I really like are 90210 and the too-soon deceased Melreose Place. I Like Hawaii Five-0 But it feels more like a totally different show that happens to have the same theme song and characters with the same names.

I could get behind a Dynasty remake if they got Joan Collins, but other than that I think I'm against it as a whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Remakes sound fun for about a second on paper. Well, they used to when they first started cropping up. Can't say that I remember (or even watched) a full episode, but when I caught Love Boat: The Next Wave, I remember smiling lightly as the old familiar theme played, thinking, "Aw, this is nice... good memories, good times, nice decent family show back on the air." But I guess it didn't do so well, writing was probably way corny, it got canned. Then there was the bizarre Fantasy Island retread with Malcolm McDowell and Madchen Amick. One of the first scenes was of MM's character ordering someone to burn all of those white suits. Hm. Okay. Interesting. We're going "darker" here. But we're destroying/disrespecting the iconograpy of the brand along the way. Iffy territory here. These folks want the lure of the brand yet consumed with their own arrogance about doing their new and hip way. Why not just do your own show that's inspired by a classic show. For instance, you don't remake The Golden Girls, but go ahead and give us Living Single or The First Wives Club. Don't give me a K.I.T.T. who isn't a Trans-Am, a Bumblebee who isn't a VW bug.

All in all, these remarks are just dicey, unpredictable ventures. I mean, what makes The Bradys a bomb and The Brady Bunch Movie a hit? Besides taste, wit and some great tongue-in-cheek material, of course. ^_^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I didn't mind the Fantasy Island remake as much because the original Fantasy Island was supposed to be dark (the first episode is quite dark at times) but it was then toned down. I do think they went too far in the remake, but with proper time and guidance it might have worked. The problem is why do these shows need to be remade? If you're just cashing in on the name, then don't do it. Viewers may be stupid but they aren't that stupid.

The Brady Bunch has a long history of not knowing its limits. The Bradys in a manic variety show format? Flop. Brady Brides? Flop. The Bradys in a cheesy, way too dramatic, self-serious show with a recast of its most iconic character? Flop. The Christmas movie was a success because it captured the appeal of the original show and also kept it in a self-contained format, not a weekly series. Then with the movies, the first was fun and had some heart while still spoofing the original. The second was crass, and too hard-edged, and also pointless.

There are so few quality shows now and so few real stars so everything is just regurgitated and we're supposed to go along because it's somehow supposed to be fresh. Remember when they tried this line with the Bewitched movie, and then the whole ad campaign was Will Ferrell yelling.

Why not remake or update shows that didn't do all that well the first time or did well but can be improved on?

I've been watching some of that Rex Smith show, Street Hawk, and it's not bad at all, it's hilarious and cheesy and so serious but has some fun moments and the cast had good chemistry. Smith says he has an adaptation of that involving himself and his son. If you're that desperate then why not bring that back? Hell, throw Avery Brooks in too. Maybe Ron Moore can come along and then the press will have an orgasm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just UGH... Nothing beats the original and I absolutely hated the Hulk movies. I'm already dreading the cheap special effects when Banner turn into Hulk.

Speaking of remakes, I thought Knight Rider had a good shot and Justin Bruening was believable however the writing was atrocious. If someone had really cared about the reboot the show could have been saved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Y&R 1976 Pt 2 Bill is overjoyed when Jill arrives home with grandson. But Kay is furious and checks into legal action, only to find that there are no grounds (the check was returned). Brock Reynolds, Kay’s son from her first marriage, convinces her she can be the baby’s godmother and provide for him out of love.  But just as she’s starting arrangements to do this a legal petition arrives stating that Phillip Chancellor Foster is a rightful heir to and is now claiming his share of Phillip Chancellor’s estate. Jill has to do this, as the Foster family’s finances are now more precarious than ever. In fact, Liz, unable to get her factory job back, has secretly started working for Kay as her housekeeper. Jill explains to Kay that she has to do this for her baby’s sake but will drop the suit immediately if Kay puts it in writing that she will provide for them. Kay, however, retorts that Jill is the one who can’t be trusted—after all, she went back on her agreement to let Kay have the baby. Despite her attorney’s advice to work out an out-of-court agreement, Kay — insists on seeing this through. When Jill takes her little son to Phillip’s grave -on the Chancellor estate, Kay runs her off the property. In court, the geneticist testifies that Phillip could have been the baby’s father, but that Brock could have been, also. Jill then testifies that Phillip was the only man she was ever intimate with, and then only once; that Phillip decided on an immediate divorce from Kay and marriage to her, Jill, so that his baby could have his legal name. But Kay’s lawyer brings up the “dead-man statute,” which holds that conversations with a deceased person are not admissible as evidence because he can’t defend himself. When the  judge upholds this statute, Jill comes close to being held in contempt of court.  Brock takes the stand and substantiates Jill’s testimony that although he and Jill lived together for a time before her marriage to Phillip, they were never initimate. But the judge rules in favor of Kay; little Phillip’s claim is rejected. Jill emotionally tells the judge he has denied a child a decent life and a man  his dying wish.   Brad is told by Dr. Snapper Foster,his brother-in-law that his condition, nephritis of the optic nerve, is stable. The optic nerves are still swollen, but since his headaches have stopped he should continue his cortisone treatment. Brad is still firmly insistent that Leslie not be told.  From the moment they meet, Lance and Laurie charge the air around them with static. They find each other arrogant and egotistical, but when Lance needs a date for his trip to London, he calls Laurie, and she accepts. The pilot of Lance’s private plane cryptically suggests that Laurie turns his boss on because she seems turned off by him. This seems to hold true for Laurie, too. By the end of their London stay, Lance and Laurie have come to a better understanding of each other. Lance tries to tell her that, with talent of her own, she should not be jealous of Leslie. She tells him she has a book coming out, but it won’t be published under her own name. She explains further that she was an outgoing child and her parents didn’t understand that she needed as much attention as the introverted Leslie did. (Laurie has always felt she existed in Leslie’s shadow. Les is married to the man Laurie wanted, and is a successful concert artist, with the fame and recognition Laurie has tried so desperately to achieve. Laurie’s first book, a sexploitation novel, was a failure, and this new book is a novel based — on Leslie’s nervous breakdown and recovery—something Leslie is trying to put behind her.) Gwen Sherman, now Sister Magdellen, will soon take her final vows, but still feels God holds her past against her, because nobody could possibly believe that a prostitute could be pure enough to become a nun. She finds her accidental meetings with Greg Foster (they were once in love) increasingly meaningful to her, and she begins to dream of Greg holding her in his arms. Finally, in torment and uncertainty, she tells the Reverend Mother she’s leaving the convent. But on the day of her release, Greg arrives with one of the convent orphans unconscious in his arms.The boy had fallen from a fence outside. When the  boy, Ramon, who had not spoken a word since his arrival, comes to, asking for Sister Magdellen, Gwen sees this as a sign from God and accepts her vocation. She will take her final vows and then enter nurses’.  training.  Stay tuned...
    • I was just about to compose a post where I mention this period AW reminds me of JFP's  time on GL (1993-95) where it just reeked of cynicism and desperation. OR ATWT during Black and Stern. The common denominator is P&G. They allowed this stuff to go on.
    • I think the first 4-5 years have many strong spots, some beautiful writing, and I didn't find it that hard to watch, but one of the main issues with the show for me - and this just gets worse - is many of the characters we are told to root for I find extremely unlikeable. 
    • I don't see the people who were brought into AW around 1986 as being that different from JFP, but I don't feel like going back and forth either.
    • Agree to disagree. I think they cared. I think at times fans underestimate both the creative types & the execs. Certainly there can be specific times & specific people when ego & hubris are huge issues. But, basically, and most of the time the people involved very much want things to work. I'm not saying you don't have your Brian Frons or even your JFPs & your Susan D. Lees. We know at the end Chris Goutman had lost his way.
    • Pure bull, those scenes were.ere! The whole Liam story is going to end in disaster, just like Brad's other stories.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Joey and Vanessa's scenes are boring. Get Vanessa away from him. Anita and Eva scene was great too! Lots of good scenes in today's episode.
    • I really hope the next steps with the show are building up/out family or story for both Mona and Shanice. Mona has always struck me as prime real estate for a proper family setup.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy