Jump to content

As The World Turns Discussion Thread


edgeofnik

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I just watched her "reign" a few months ago as I make my way through the series again. She was on for 2, maybe 3, episodes and that was it. It was around the holidays. Sierra came back with her but we saw much more of Sierra. They use Seyfried's photo constantly as the Hong Kong Syndicate is threatening Craig's family for the money he owes them. But, other than that, there's nothing til the Peyton List recast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 17.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • DRW50

    2971

  • DramatistDreamer

    1958

  • Soapsuds

    1716

  • P.J.

    823

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Exactly. It's literally a handful of episodes. The scenes I remember are with Maura West, as Lucy snottily asks if Carly's Craig's mistress. She then goes on about how parents don't understand the damage they do to their kids, which leads to Carly going to Julia I and apologizing for throwing the (cheap looking) Christmas stocking Julia bought for her and Jack's unborn child. 

If Seyfried got paid for the use of her photo, she got a good deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

From reading the first pages of the early 1991 plans, it looked as though the Carolyn Crawford murder was always planned to span months (going to at least May 1992 sweeps). 

His first mistake was the victim he picked was someone that the viewers didn't really know nor care about.  I think she was only on the show on and off for several months, but we didn't really get to know/care about her.

His second mistake was having Frannie be the other woman/follow up wife.  Not because the actress wasn't capable (I prefer her to Julianne Moore), but because Frannie already had the psycho boyfriend story so why subject her to another psycho/killer.   

His third mistake was deciding to not make Daryl the killer, and I have a feeling his decision to change that caused the story to drag even longer because he had to figure out who could logically be the killer.

His fourth mistake was the use of so many small parts/characters that viewers didn't know nor care about.. that ended up killed just as they were going to reveal vital information.

The one minor character I think was interesting was Dana.  She was kind of a hot mess and was kind of comedic in her performances.. and I do recall she did kind of intersect with other characters during major events for a time.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

found this on page 37 of the marland 1991 longterm. looks like doug had the same idea initially. i do think it made more sense storywise for lisa to question the marriage. 

Please register in order to view this content

Please register in order to view this content

 

Edited by wonderwoman1951
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You aren't wrong about any of this, but I only have one real issue with the story.

I don't think making Darryl the killer was the best idea, because it's just so predictable and there wasn't going to be enough fallout (the real fallout was Darryl leaving town alive, as, in a world where Frannie was recast and Jennifer learned about her father, or if Connor had stayed around given the odd decision to create a past fling between them, there was plenty you could do with him), but they should have done a better job finding another killer. The Harpers, or Arthur - who cares? If they were going to have a minor character as the killer, I might have gone with Dana, as she didn't go on to have any purpose once the plot was over anyway.

When I was able to watch at the time, I never felt the story was overly confusing or boring because I just cared about Frannie and the turmoil she was in. To me that was the engine. And in recent years, when I've rewatched, Frannie, as well as Barbara and the fallout she suffered from her paternity lies, still make me feel invested. The parade of bit players is OK with me because they are often just rattled through Margo and Tom, and this is when they still felt like real people instead of shouting all their lines. This is where my feeling connected to the central characters was key - once that connection was broken, I had a much harder time, which is why I thought the whole Diego murder storyline was somewhere between boring and wretched.

The only stories at this point on ATWT that bothered me were the stories with characters like Hutch and Rosanna, which bored me to tears, aside from Tess' bitchy asides. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

Reading this and being in the middle of early '87 myself (with Frannie a year out from Doug Cummings and not too far off from when her next fiance will sleep with her identical sister), I just can't see how they could justify having Frannie embroiled in a long storyline with another calculating madman, making yet again the worst possible choice in a man.

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And that's probably why Marland got cold feet.

The story is a whirlwind, probably too much so (Frannie and Darryl are intimate only a few months after Carolyn's murder), but Darryl never comes across as being as much of a heavy as Cummings did, so it's not as much of a retread as it could have been. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I thought I read that the reason that Marland backtracked was due to Rex Smith's likeability, that they listened to the feedback from fans and changed the story. Unfortunately (just as in Suspicion) it ruins careful plotting and cheated the audience. Frankly, Rex Smith would've made a convincing sociopath, simply because his acting was that shallow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I've heard that too. I think Smith did a decent job with a character who on paper was extremely vague, and he also had chemistry with Mary Ellen Stuart, which hadn't been the case with some of her other love interests. I can see why Marland was torn. But I also think they were hedging their bets much of the way through because there were a number of occasions where I felt like the writing tilted more toward a framing of what happens when someone who seems like the perfect murder suspect actually isn't, instead of laying out a case for viewers the way they did with Doug Cummings. 

I do wonder if they realized how quickly Rex Smith was going to leave and if Marland had plans to recast the character if he'd lived.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Posted (edited)

I think the idea of an involved mystery where a frankly deeply ambiguous/unsympathetic or flawed character is teased as the murderer, then proven not to be and everyone has to find a way to go on with their lives, the suspect included, is interesting (a la the movie

Please register in order to view this content

That just didn't seem to be the aim here. 

Edited by Vee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Reading some of the other 1991 outlines, it does appears as though what was written actually translated to the screen.

I faintly remember the Cal/Lucinda/Lyla situation... and it was a shame that Cal/Lucinda didn't proceed past a physical relationship.. but both were stubborn and too strong willed to have made a relationship last long term.  Though Cal/Lyla also didn't seem to have long term legs either and it also didn't last beyond 1992/3 if I recall correctly.

It looks as though Lisa and Ellen were in back-up position in these outlines, and while Lisa did move back into lead position in 1992/3.. Ellen never did even though it looked as though killing David off in the summer of 1991 was the first step to getting Ellen back into a more prominent position, which didn't happen.  

Outside of Emily, I don't think Marland was as motivated to write for the Stewarts as he was for the Hughes, Walsh, and Snyders.  In his defense, when he got to the show.. only Betsy, Ellen, and David were on the show... and he wasn't motivated to write for Betsy/Steve nor Ellen/David was previous writers were.   Even after Betsy became a free agent in 1986, the writing for Betsy was just not as strong and it appeared that was also the case for Ellen even after she was freed up after David's death.

It's the direct opposite of the Dobson's and the other head writers that came before Marland.  If you look at the show from 1980 to 1985, the Stewart family had a lot more focus then the Hughes family with Dee, Annie, Ellen, Betsy, and David in various stories.  Too much story was probably burned through for them, but Dee could have easily come back during the Marland years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm blanking on who they even tried her with---Ed Fry and the dude who played Sean Baxter?  (I nearly did a spit take when I read that line about how the audience liked Larry--uh, maybe?) I liked MES, but she wasn't what I'd call a chemistry magnet. She had more chem over on GL playing a cop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks! Looking forward to reading the rest!
    • 1995 Daytime Emmys https://www.instagram.com/p/DJjjxOupJcS/ Deidre Hall & DAYS OF OUR LIVES Edit Special Lifetime Achievement Emmy to Ted & Betty Corday presented by Frances Reid
    • I don't really care about what the men are wearing, or not wearing.   What I care about is focusing on the writing and character development for each of the male characters. Andre really doesn't have a lot of character development that sets him apart from the other male characters except that he seems content to be degraded and mistreated by the elitist Dani.  I would like to know why a good looking younger guy like Andre would willingly be at the mercy of an emotional vampire such as Dani.   Martin, on the other hand, seems to have decent character development.. and it is partly due to how the actor chooses to recite his lines.  Martin was raised in a very privileged household and probably went to the best schools... so it makes sense that he would come across as thinking he was above everyone else.  Most people raised in a upper class situation as the Duprees would view themselves as better than others (it's the same trait Dani seems to employ on those she feels superior to). It makes me wonder how Nicole came out of that family being so warm and nurturing  when her family dynamics seemed very appearance oriented.    
    • I know, right. I after just re-reading the thread, I'm like ooppph!
    • Lulu and Dante were divorced before her coma, but she was still in love with him.  He just didn't know.  They haven't been married for years.    I was pretty mixed about Lulu getting involved when it was just a child out there in the world, but now that she realizes it's Gio I am okay with her telling Dante.  It also is her son's sibling.  I still think it's BLQ's choice though.  Lulu is in a rough spot because I think Dante will be mad if she keeps it a secret and Chase, Brook, Lois, etc will be mad if Lulu tells. Without veering too far into the classic area of the show, I had no problem with Robin telling AJ about Michael.  It may not have *exactly* been her place, but she could see how Carly was manipulating the entire situation.  It also ruined her romantic relationship with Jason for good.  Jason and Sonny were furious with Robin and practically ran her out of town, so I think we were to believe she was the bad guy.  It was a bit out of character for Robin to spill, but KMc was leaving the show.
    • Rewatching/binging THE X-FILES Seasons 1 and 2 (almost done). So much fun re-experiencing, especially re-discovering some of the monster-of-the-week stories. THE WEST WING Seasons 1 and 2 as well - so good to rewatch now with 20 years more life experience and understanding. ALSO.... lol FOOTBALLERS' WIVES Season 3, which is just as bonkers as I remember and so so so so fun. I had forgotten about that iconic season cliffhanger. Good times. Excited to rewatch Seasons 4 and 5 since I remember so very little about them. Hope you've been enjoying!
    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy