Here come the brides … Soap Opera Digest is reporting that a double wedding is in the future for Llanview. But it may not go off as planned. My bet? Brody/Nat and Jess & company/Brody.

Wow....Nelson must not have any inside info. anymore. Because, if he did, he would know that the double wedding/would-be wedding will conist of

David/Dorian & Blair/Eli

.

Louella: "No, I knew. I just didn't want to give anything away. Wink, wink."

Louella: "No, I knew. I just didn't want to give anything away. Wink, wink."

Wow @"Vivienne". Is that even her character's first name?

It's Nelson's tribute to "Maude."

Wow....Nelson must not have any inside info. anymore. Because, if he did, he would know that the double wedding/would-be wedding will conist of

David/Dorian & Blair/Eli

.

I didn't understand his guesses at all because he makes it sound like Brody would be marrying both Nat and Jess which... I know he's got it going on like that but not even Brody can simultaneously marry the twin bimbos he knocked up, in a double ceremony. That's too Jerry Springer even for OLTL.

LMAOOO too funny!

I didn't understand his guesses at all because he makes it sound like Brody would be marrying both Nat and Jess which... I know he's got it going on like that but not even Brody can simultaneously marry the twin bimbos he knocked up, in a double ceremony. That's too Jerry Springer even for OLTL.

I know right? That was stupid even for Nelson.

It's Nelson's tribute to "Maude."

That definitely crossed my mind and even then he didn't get the spelling right.

And then there's Fraude...

Uh...SON's quoting system is frustrating. But yeah, Scotty said:

Wow....Nelson must not have any inside info. anymore. Because, if he did, he would know that the double wedding/would-be wedding will conist of David/Dorian & Blair/Eli

He shoots...and he fails. Epically, epically fails. (I took off the spoiler tags because we're on the spoiler board LOL)

I didn't understand his guesses at all because he makes it sound like Brody would be marrying both Nat and Jess which... I know he's got it going on like that but not even Brody can simultaneously marry the twin bimbos he knocked up, in a double ceremony. That's too Jerry Springer even for OLTL.

But you know what's sad, though? I didn't know who the participants in the wedding were going to be, but instead of thinking Nelson got it wrong with Brody marrying both sisters, my first thought was "Wow, OLTL just keeps getting dumber and dumber."

And then there's Fraude...

:lol:

I'm surprised Frank and Ronald haven't thought about adding some ex-sitcom stars to their cast (besides the sublime Ms. Hubert). Knowing them, though, they'd add an ex-sitcom star, have her play a hatchet job version of her most famous character, and name the new character with a "quirky" spin on the original character's name.

Beverly Archer IN as Lola Boyd!

Edited August 6, 201015 yr by All My Shadows

OTOH, Brody could marry one or the other secretly w/o anyone else knowing, making him a bigamist like GH's Ned.

But you know what's sad, though? I didn't know who the participants in the wedding were going to be, but instead of thinking Nelson got it wrong with Brody marrying both sisters, my first thought was "Wow, OLTL just keeps getting dumber and dumber."

THIS! LOL!

Ditto. If my mother is any indication, the Weather Channel must jump in ratings everytime a soap goes off the air. "Who goes driving in a storm like that?!"

LOL!

*applause*

This isn't 1973. Why would someone who's watched ATWT for the last thirty years suddenly become interested in a show that they've presumably never watched before, considering it's been on either partially or directly opposite OLTL for all of those thirty years? It doesn't make any sense, and I wish they stop clinging to that.

I have an old SOD from around 1989 where one of the execs of Generations had that mentality, but it was "based on research" that there's only a certain amount of viewers out there who are interested in watching soaps, and therefore it's more realistic to try to lure viewers away from timeslot competitor, Y&R, than to try to be enticing to non-soap fans at all. That makes sense for the most part, even in 1989, but nowadays (and for over 10 years now) a longtime soap fan who's frustrated with their show will give up on the medium altogether.

It is certainly scary seeing other daytime alternatives, though. From endless courtroom shows where the judges are total jokes to crappy talk shows. I know I would hear the buzz when Springer goes off the air, but really, he's still on? And his old bodyguard dude has a show of his own? Oy.... I'll watch a rerun of Desperate Housewives on Lifetime, or I Love Lucy. Or local news. Network syndicated daytime shows are awful.