Jump to content

The Suds Report 7/30/10


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Makes you nostalgic for Carolyn Hinsey repeatedly demanding AMC hire Alexa and Bruening back immediately and give even more stories to Zach :lol:

Well not really.

I still read DC, and enjoy some of their writeups. My opinion of them was never really the same after the "Auntie Ri Ri" nausea, but then, that's just me. At least they later admitted there were problems with some couples they once loved, like Rex/Gigi.

I stopped reading Branco months ago but the whole look at me stuff and the OTT blind items and the whole David Canary thing and the constant going back and forth to the point where you would get a migraine :wacko:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Fight! Fight! Fight! LOL! Whatever the story, I'm glad that Jamey isn't getting along with Nelson. I remember when posters would rightly call out Nelson on DC, Jamey would passionately defend his BS. I'm glad Jamey is getting pie in the face. It is well deserved.

LOL! I doubt Nelson ever looked like that picture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

At least Hinsey had the good sense to only get sloppy drunk and abuse underlings/molest the talent while she was offline. It took years for all the [!@#$%^&*] on her to really come out. If Hinsey had come up today she would've been toast much sooner.

I do wonder what set Jamey off. Seems to be something about a BI from Branco but I haven't noticed anything that points to DC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A few days ago, Nelson posted a blind item on his twitter that one soap blogger was a ghost writer for Victoria Rowell's book. Then Nelson deleted it a few hours later. So I'm guessing that was aimed at Jamey Giddens. But I doubt that alone would set off Jamey. Something else must of happened too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Oh, that's probably at least part of it - I think I saw some sort of very strong reaction to that line of questioning over on DC a couple days ago. I say so what if he helped write it (I hope he was compensated)? But if so it probably should've been disclosed. Wait, no, I'm an idiot, the whole point of ghostwriting is ghosts. Sorry, it's been a really long week. This is why they're big time Internet journalists and I'm not!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah! this whole thing went to head when some poster( who was making different accounts)on Daytime Confidential, was questioning Jamey about him being involve with Victoria Rowell book. So Jamey replied. This is not Nelson Bronco site it me and Luke site and if you have any question ask Nelson, since it was his blind item.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Indeed. She's grown into her divadom (as far as roles are concerned). Maya was an ingenue, not even a Jr. Diva really.

Wait, so *allegedly* NB was implying that JG supplied VR with more dirt that was fictionalized for her book? :blink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She sure has. ;)

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na7MES6Hbuo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param'>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na7MES6Hbuo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=na7MES6Hbuo&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol: To that, she'd give you her patented:

<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/8-3mjInSfIs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&start=237?color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b&amp;border=1"></param><param'>http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/8-3mjInSfIs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&start=237?color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b&amp;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/8-3mjInSfIs&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&start=237?color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy