Jump to content

Bob Guza interview


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It was just another typical GH episode to me. Everything seems great on screen; well acted, directed, even well scripted, but when you take a moment to look at the big picture it's one big old contrived mess.

It's sad how GH is seemingly the best soap, simply because the others are dog s-h-i-t by comparison. I am grateful though, as a soap fan, that at least there is still a soap that is still well acted, directed, and well scripted these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You have people who just don't care about acting, a lot of people who think they can act but really can't, a lot of people who stopped doing anything but hammy tics years ago, some actresses who tend to resort to sneers or smirks, and then some people who can act and do what they can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If you want a well acted scene, you pretty much need Constance Towers, John Ingle, Tony Geary or Jane Elliot. The rest are all pretty hit and miss..and miss and miss. Sometimes they have a good scene here and there. Jonathan Jackson and Nathan Parsons are ok and can hang with the above crew.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I couldn't have said it better. I want romance, family dynamics, friendships, social issues, ripe drama, and humor. I don't want mob members, constant crime and violence with the entire show based around that crime and violence. And I know it's opinion, but I think OLTL and AMC offer most of those on their worst days better than the GH of today could ever dream to. Well...maybe not the romance. I'm finding none of the soaps really encapsulate "love in the afternoon" anymore. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't need romance and family issues. Edge Of Night I think was probably the best written soap ever and their theme was murder mysteries and crime dramas. The problem with GH for me is the mob genre. It is passé. It was a tired genre ten years ago and there is nothing left to do with it. That's why even Pacino and DeNiro don't make those movies anymore. (that and they are 900 years old)

Every soap doesn't have to be the same, I just wish GH would choose a new way to be different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
    • I appreciate that you are using AI with the knowledge of it's limitations. Some posters take everything it produces as fact.
    • And of course Mama Ru herself appeared on All My Children.
    • The Saturday 8pm slot usually had the lowest rating of the NBC 4 sitcom lineup for some reason. NBC let Saturday night fizzle, They used 9.30 pm to launch 227 and Amen, both of which moved to earlier in the evening but they  kept Empty Nest following GG for several seasons.  Empty Nest should have moved to 8pm with their strongest new sitcom at 9.30, anticipating that GG would eventually falter. Instead they left them there and stretching the sitcom pool too thinly on other nights. When Grand talk over at 9.30 Thurs maybe Night Court and Wings could have been used on Saturday.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy