Jump to content

June 21-25, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

LOL!!! I agree with you 100%. Every time I see a post says Frons this Frons that, I keep asking myself who is feeding this junk to people. Though I think Frons interferes, I don't think he want to see any of his daytime products fail. What kind of manager would that make him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yeah maybe the Brooke hater audience did return, but not enough to counter-act the Brooke fans who have had their fill of the character being torn down and degraded for the Forrester Twits that this latest storyline was the last straw. I have been done with B&B, since the boink, and haven't missed it one damn bit. My mom quit as well and I never thought that day would come. It is funny to look at the demos, B&B lost almost half its audience in the 12-18 group. I wouldn't be surprised if they were enjoying Oliver and Hope and B&B stupidly ruined that couple for a few minutes of shock and titillation.

Same with Y&R, can't be bothered to waste my time of day on it. Soaps are dead to me, RIP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well said. Advertisers buy upfront. Also, statistically, there is little difference between AMC and OLTL's numbers. Both are in trouble because they have lost audience in the 18-49 key demo. AMC appears to be making a creative recovery of sorts, but it is too soon to tell if that will last and if it will translate into the addition of more younger viewers. OLTL has a strong teen focus this summer, but its demo numbers need to rise significantly for it to separate tself from AMC. Finally, OLTL's last-place finish, even if it is total viewers, isn't pretty.

I agree with the previous psoter that Y&R is the only safe soap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It pains me to see that 0.8 for AMC in the 18-49 demo. I love AMC right now and I am very entertained by the more traditional story telling. OLTL deserves the ratings its getting and I don't wish to see it canceled but I am glad it has dropped just to prove the "Gays" didn't drop the ratings to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If this is true he hasn't changed a thing. He keeps going in the same direction which is failing. He would admit he is wrong with the direction the shows are going in. All have lost viewers and all have not gained or gone up in the ratings. If he wants the shows to make it he better start making the changes that need to be made!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The reason why OLTL will be gone before AMC will is because of the year on year number. AMC has grown in the total viwers, Men, and Teens. Everyone's demos number are HORRIBLE. If everyone went by that every soap would be canceled except Y&R.

At this point networks are now looking at every category closely. OLTL always being last in Total Viewers and behind a canceld ATWT is not good for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nobody is worried about teens, men, and old people. It's all about Women 18-49 and OLTL is ahead of AMC, and going by buisness instead of the show with "the bigger name", AMC should go first.

This argument has been discussed to death, whichever one goes first the other won't last that long afterwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think that DAYS is going to revive the ratings this time, next week DAYS will fall because of tennis tournament, and there's a possibility that they will hit new low for HH next week. To be honest, I don't think changing head writers or producers can save the show, Tomlin/Dena/Christopher are the beast team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

DAYS hit a 1.7 during the Wimbledon week in 2008, but NBC coded the episodes as specials. So technically if they hit a 1.7 (which is the lowest I expect) it won't really be a new low.

And why can't DAYS revive the ratings? It is the summer, and for most of the spring they had all their stories stalling and not alot going on.

They have alot of secrets that can help the show big time. Chloe/Philip's one nighter, Who' the father of Chloe's baby, Hope being revealed as the mugger, EJ being behind the kidnapping, the stuff with Madeline/Stefano/Kate, Nicole framing Arianna.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

To be honest, I think ABC will have a difficult descision to cancel OLTL or AMC. Both soaps ratings are at risk however, AMC total ratings are higher than OLTL this year but, ABC focused only on women 18-49 ratings and OLTL is higher than AMC in the demos. GH is safe and it's the last ABC soap to cancel. I think personally think that ABC should cancel OLTL AND!!! AMC but I don't want these two soaps to end.

Well, Alice's funeral is the most anticipating storyline this year and it didn't effect the ratings that well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The current ATWT rise is very different from the GL situation. ATWT is putting out a better story and viewers are tuning in. I think Goutman was smart not to devote the final months totally to vet returns but instead just keep going with story. The show is up more than 100,000 viewers from last year to date which means fans have not given up on World and that the show has more life in it. GL was done by the final season and few fans could stand the outdoor filming. CBS wants cheap programming, the genre is basically finished; however, ATWT still has life in it. Too bad no other media outlet was willing to pick it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree that ATWT shouldn't have been cancelled, but they are only up so much in viewers over last year, because their numbers were HORRIBLE this time last year. I really don't think it means it's gaining an audience or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think bringing back vets would have hurt ratings. Considering that the ratings have gone up when vets like Barbara and Lucinda have been featured more than they have in a long time, perhaps they should have brought people back. If the choice is between a veteran and someone like Liberty, who seems more like she's about to get voted off Survivor than a cancer patient, I think people would rather see a vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
    • Note to makeup - Smitty’s eyebrows, bad clamshell look.  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Okay I can buy that when Brook Lynn was a teen.  Now she knows the child is a boy one would think she'd be slightly suspicious.  Then again, Gio looks nothing like either of them so maybe not lol.
    • I've been behind & just got caught up & the last 3 days were amazing!
    • Yeah.  The hot, poor bad boy with a chip on his shoulder but with a heart of gold was a common soap trope in the 80s 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That's been an issue with me... the lack of a cohesive 'Have Not' crowd that has focus other than Leslie/Eva.   I would beef up Jan, Mona, Laura, Joey, and few other male characters.. and not just be out to overthrow the Duprees.. but co-existing and broadening the scope of the show since the show is called Beyond the Gates. I think the set up the show has with everything revolving around the Duprees will become predictable especially if they always win.   It would be like Victor Newman on Y & R for 40+ years.. always winning, hardly ever losing.   With MVJ/Guza.. both trained under that mindset... I fear that will happen.   I've always heard from a performer that is playing a character like Leslie/Dana that you have to find the victim/hurt beneath the surface in order to play a villain/villainess... and I think that's why I enjoy watching her.. because she brings so much more to the part than what the writers put on the page.
    • I figure that was really hard for Dom to do. I completely GET why they wrote it the way they did but I wonder if it was necessary. Meanwhile I have 2 really icky ideas in my head. Drew is going to blame Tracy KNOWING it was not her. Dante is going to blame Lulu.  After that, everyone else is going to be mad at Lois.  Tracy is going to double down on wanting to get rid of Sonny. Sonny's going to be more dug in to stay because he now has a new descendant. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy