Jump to content

Y&R: Actor Confirms His Return To The Show


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

actually i think y&r's quality and writing is going the way amc did. its not like amc, but amc went from such rich stories pre-2002 to what it is now. it cannot even get back to that amc of old because of fronz and his fab 3 or 4. well i'm sensing y&r is going this exact same pattern, they keep adding to the cast with actors that don't suit y&r, y&r hasnt been a bell-like soap since 2006, y&r is now trying to be trendy like amc did. we won't get back the bell-like soap anymore, and i never thought y&r would do that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

After all Adam did, I don't see how they can redeem him.

Today's US show is kind of creepy in the Sharon/Adam angst. Seems like out of nowhere she's thinking of him fondly in how he treated her. If they have her take him back after all he did then that's ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And the baby I know she's carrying by Adam (don't lie, Maria, you know you're going there)? That won't make this situation any less so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly.

For once, Sharon has decided to put her baby (Faith) and herself before everything else. Now, maybe the writers will "test" that w/ Adam's reappearance, and leave it there. Something tells me, however, even after Sharon has ordered him out of her and Faith's lives, they'll really up the stakes by revealing she's pregnant again. Either that, or her recent little trip through the cornfield during "spraying season" will have major physical repercussions down the road, leaving Sharon and Faith vulnerable to Adam, who will use her illness as an excuse to the court for why he needs to stay out of jail (i.e., Sharon's ill, she needs round-the-clock care, only he, as her (still legal) husband, can provide that, yada yada).

Either way, too, they'll use Sharon's sudden predicament and Adam's immediate response to that as a way of "redeeming" Adam for the audience. I see it coming, and I know I'm not alone in saying, I'm not falling for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

He's not her legal husband. It was annulled, they pointed out so last week when they were trying to get the body tested.

I don't see how she was almost dead last week, with drugs and on medical machines and them not know she was pregnant if she was. I don't think a pregnancy story is going to happen here. Too much time has passed and Sharon has half dead last week. A simple blood test would have outed it back then.

They are however using the Adam was there for her and let her be her own strong person thing against her. But if she lets him back into her life she needs to head right back to the psych ward. He kidnapped her kid, let her think it was dead, gave it to Ashley and robbed her of all that time. That's unforgivable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think someone said it did exist, but I can't remember.
    • The bit with the scarf reminds me of the fabled stuffed animal scene with Rick and Phillip. (That wasn't debunked, was it?)
    • Ohh, interesting. I instantly gravitated towards her in that episode. Of course I'm already hooked and want to know why she was trying to poison that older lady, but then how did the older lady know to switch the mugs so Susan drank her own poison...  but I have too many timelines I'm watching right now haha.  Oh, Bolger is definitely hot. I didn't realize he was on GL haha. I knew him from OLTL and other primetime stuff.
    • This is a effin shame. Eff Trump and eff the bastards that enable him.
    • I 100% agree but I think this is due to how the show is structured. It's a one family show which means there are no people in her age range that could be used as friends or contemporaries of her. The show definitely needs a second main family. I am glad someone finally said this. Especially now that the cast is gelling in their roles, he stands out like a sore thumb. No energy, no chemistry with anybody. He is just there.  I thought that was odd as well! The previous scene would've worked better as a tag for the credits.
    • That's the one and only Carrie Nye (Mrs. Dick Cavett) as Susan Piper, a deadly realtor. I don't want to spoil a lot if you ever want to see those episodes. She returns as another character in 2003. I think Grant has aged well and he always did a good job at being ripped without going too far, but he was never entirely my cup of tea either. I did think John Bolger was hot.
    • Totally agree. KKL looks great! It makes the Widge groveling so bizarre. Brooke needs to leave FC and with $B's/Liam's funding launch a rival fashion house with Hope, Rick, Katie and a secret designer. The best scenario is that Rick has been absent because he's been with very much alive C2, who is revealed on the runway as the secret designer. It'll never happen because B&B is comfortable just focusing on FC and the Forresters Marones v. Logans. But it'd been so much more interesting if the Spencers/Logans united.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Haha that scarf thing did go on a bit too long, very odd. And what a young Rick!  I know this is an unpopular opinion, but I just never got the physical appeal of Grant Aleksander, but he's definitely a great actor. Who is the older lady around the 8:30 mark, and also ends the episode, alone and in pain? She seems like a really interesting character. I love the smoky voice and sultry, snaky vibe she seems to have.
    • I can't remember exactly but I think she lives in or is part of the cottage story with Carrie. Carrie poisons her in this episode.  I forgot Teresa was on the show. (I see that AI is insisting she wasn't - well they're wrong) Poor Maeve. I can how even she had her limits. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy