Wrong.

Here's a novel, downright radical idea... how about watching and deciding for yourself?

I'm just sayin'. Unless you like listening to biased depictions of scenes.

I will watch as soon as the clips are online. I've actually heard the same thing from a few different people, so there must be something to it.

Did you see it differently?

Edited May 24, 201015 yr by Kylie

I don't care what David meant to happen, he and his lackey have to pay and pay big for this one. Sorry they wrote him into this corner, but what's done is done, and in this corner he must be. A man is dead (right? ). Watch them come up with some crap like they got the black box and the pilot was texting while flying and the crash had absolutely nothing to do with David's machinations.

Saint David?

No way!

Caleb called Erica Toto because she yaps to much!

What is with the "Wizard of Oz" references, Caleb? He's probably pissed, b/c Erica's plane destroyed his collection of Manolo Blahniks.

(BTW, reallyhateskate, are you glad she's...you know...?)

Have the writers done their research on technolgy? This touch screen computer that Scott is planning on creating and making money off of was already done years ago. Touchscreen is hardly something new

I cannot believe I slept through this today. I really wanted to see the rescue. Thank god for soapnet.

Have the writers done their research on technolgy? This touch screen computer that Scott is planning on creating and making money off of was already done years ago. Touchscreen is hardly something new.

At this point, Scott Chandler is merely daytime's answer to Gilligan.

Wrong.

Here's a novel, downright radical idea... how about watching and deciding for yourself?

I'm just sayin'. Unless you like listening to biased depictions of scenes.

Even if the pilot's heart still beats, David's hands are still dirty. Kylie obviously just wanted to participate in live posting, but regardless of when she catches the ep, David covering his butt is fact, not opinion. No bias here.

Even if the pilot's heart still beats, David's hands are still dirty. Kylie obviously just wanted to participate in live posting, but regardless of when she catches the ep, David covering his butt is fact, not opinion. No bias here.

To be fair, I did ask what his reaction was before commenting. LOL I'd heard the same thing from people at different places and wanted to see what the read was here. Sounds like it's pretty consistent across the board.

And just for the record, I'm in the UK, not possible to watch in any timezone.

Edited May 24, 201015 yr by Kylie

I LOVE Erica and this new guy. I wasnt sold on him from early pics but there interactions today were great. He reminded me a bit of Chris Stamp

I LOVE Erica and this new guy. I wasnt sold on him from early pics but there interactions today were great. He reminded me a bit of Chris Stamp

Yeah, it's definitely going to be *that kinda thing*, taming Erica the shrew. I'm interested in seeing how (if at all) this relationship will be different though, it would be cool if Caleb ends up having a stronger past and life of his own outside of Erica's sphere.

At this point, Scott Chandler is merely daytime's answer to Gilligan.

Magilligan?

Have the writers done their research on technolgy? This touch screen computer that Scott is planning on creating and making money off of was already done years ago. Touchscreen is hardly something new

Well... its not just touch screen. It the ability to have any computer (whatever form) to display/project the screen onto anything... and then with the touch screen, you're able to interact from where it's projecting. Like if you project onto your chest - you can then touch your chest to interact/command computer to do something.

From what I know, I've only really seen something like this on Star Trek (although that's projecting into air...like a hologram...and then touch screen is used).

Imagine your PDA or blackberry being able to project onto walls or back of airplane seats - you get a much bigger picture and the same functionality through touching wall, etc.

...... or am I totally off here?

When Scott was talking about it the other day, I thought I had already heard of it too. I looked it up, check out this link:

http://www.tuvie.com/transform-your-tabletop-a-touch-screen-instantly-with-light-touch/

Well... its not just touch screen. It the ability to have any computer (whatever form) to display/project the screen onto anything... and then with the touch screen, you're able to interact from where it's projecting. Like if you project onto your chest - you can then touch your chest to interact/command computer to do something.

From what I know, I've only really seen something like this on Star Trek (although that's projecting into air...like a hologram...and then touch screen is used).

Imagine your PDA or blackberry being able to project onto walls or back of airplane seats - you get a much bigger picture and the same functionality through touching wall, etc.

...... or am I totally off here?

if thats the case then you articulated what Kreizman and Swajeski were trying to get across ALOT better than they had

Well... its not just touch screen. It the ability to have any computer (whatever form) to display/project the screen onto anything... and then with the touch screen, you're able to interact from where it's projecting. Like if you project onto your chest - you can then touch your chest to interact/command computer to do something.

From what I know, I've only really seen something like this on Star Trek (although that's projecting into air...like a hologram...and then touch screen is used).

Imagine your PDA or blackberry being able to project onto walls or back of airplane seats - you get a much bigger picture and the same functionality through touching wall, etc.

...... or am I totally off here?

You're exactly right.

if thats the case then you articulated what Kreizman and Swajeski were trying to get across ALOT better than they had

Well, Kate Hall did a good job of explaining it on Friday. I understood the concept of the invention.

Edited May 24, 201015 yr by Jonathan

Magilligan?

+1.