Jump to content

Victoria Rowell: "Debbi Morgan wanted to come to Y&R"


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 400
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It just hasn't been done that way. The black actors are integrated within the shows. Omar Epps, Shemar Moore, Rocky Carroll, Laurence Fishburne, Gary Dourdan, Donald Faison, Chandra Wilson, Vanessa Williams, Tracie Thoms, Anthony Anderson, Epatha Merkerson, Henry Simmons, Sophia Brown, Aisha Hinds, Jon Michael Hill, James McDaniel, Rose Rollins, Evan Ross, Gugu Mbtha-Raw, Boris Kodjoe.. the list goes on and on, and I ahvne't even touched the CW shows. But I suppsoe someone;s gonna come up with some reason that none of these people matter, or make no difference.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Unfortunately, that's true. There are many who won't cut the networks and studios any slack no matter what. Which is why, in the end, I believe in the old philosophy that if what you're watching on TV isn't satisfying to you, then you need only change the channel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They do matter, and they do make a difference. However, aside from Fishburne, none of the actors you have listed "carry" their respective shows the way actors (and actresses) such as Mark Harmon, Hugh Laurie, Julianna Margulies, and the ladies from "Desperate Housewives" carry theirs. (Even LL Cool J has to share his show, "NCIS: Los Angeles," w/ Chris O'Donnell -- not that I'm complaining, of course, since I find O'Donnell hot, lol.) Where's our "House," our "Mad Men," our "Office" and "30 Rock"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They matter, and they do make a difference. But where are the leading actors and actress? Omar Epps supports Hugh Laurie. Shemar Moore supports Thomas Gibson and Joe Mantegna. Rocky Carroll supports Mark Harmon. Gary Dourdan supported William Peterson. Donald Faison supported Zach Braff. Chandra Wilson supports Patrick Dempsey and Ellen Pompeo. Tracie Thoms supported Kathryn Morris. Henry Simmons supported Dennis Franz. Jon Michael Hill will support Michael Imperioli. And as we all know, regardless of race, supporting actors and actresses are severely unappreciated. And, also, almost allll of these people, even Fishburne, who is the star, are on ensemble shows, where it's easy to make a supporting character or two or three minorities. "Undercovers" is a GIGANTIC step in the right direction, IMO, because those two characters could have easily been white, and as much as I roll my eyes at Abrams, his name being attached to this show will really work in its favor.

Out of all those sitcoms on CBS, NBC, and ABC, none of them could focus on black characters? Contrary to popular belief, shows with predominantly black casts can be and have been huge hits with all races in the past. "Sanford and Son" was a top ten show for five seasons and the second most-watched show in the US for three. "The Jeffersons" was highly-rated for most of its run. "The Cosby Show" speaks for itself, and "A Different World" was in the top ten for four seasons.

I'm not saying that black people won't watch non-black people, because they obviously have for 60 years. That's not the point. The point is that we should be at a point where that lame ass "Life Unexpected" could be about black people or "Brothers & Sisters" could be about a black family, and we're not there, and there's still a long way to go.

Think about it in terms of orientation. There are certain things that gay people know it would be foolish to want to see on TV because it just won't happen, at all. Not now, at least. The networks won't put on a show that focuses on a gay relationship, they wouldn't put on a show where the main character - not the friend, not the neighbor, not the brother, not the grandfather, etc - is gay (imagine if JD from "Scrubs" was gay) unless it's "Will & Grace," etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually, AMS, that's a bad example. Fred G. Sanford (the "G" stands for "Get Rich Quick") was a dishonest junkman always looking to make a fast buck; and his son, Lamont, was a strident dunderhead, played by an actor with the comic timing of a mule. Compared to "That's My Mama!," though, S&S was probably "Masterpiece Theatre."

Because, George Jefferson walking on the back of a white man (Mr. Bentley)? That's just gold, lol.

Word.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Bottom line.

The ONLY reason Non White Heterosexual People deal with watching White Heterosexual People on tv is cause that's the way it's ALWAYS been (with few exceptions).

The idea that "changing the channel" will solve Non White People's problems of disparity & lack of representation doesn't wash.

Know why?

Cause when the channel is changed?

MORE. WHITE. PEOPLE.

The reason why cable is constantly gaining ground on network tv is cause there are more options & greater opportunities for ALL kinds of people (Black, Asian, Hispanic, Women, Older People, Gay, Disabled) then what network television CHOOSES to deal with.

There is absolutely NO reason why there shouldn't be an Asian Brothers & Sisters or a Gay Lost or a Hispanic House.

There's just not.

Worst of all it's been proven time & again no matter HOW successful a Minority Show is, how much it crosses over to other audiences or other audiences cross over TO them they will be undercut until they fail for reasons that should be blatantly obvious.

That's also NOT taking into account how new networks ALWAYS take advantage of "minority programming" until they build enough profit to dump the "minority shows", climb out of the "television ghetto" & become "respectable" with shows "normal" (meaning WHITE people) want to watch (shows about OTHER White People).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Donald Bogle wrote several very good books on this subject.

There was also a pretty good book on this called In Living Color, or something like that, which talked about how FOX abandoned blacks as soon as they made enough money and had shows that were seen as cool by white people, like the X Files.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're right. The main difference is the WB only had a few good shows (and even some of those seemed to be watched as camp, like Dawson's Creek), whereas Fox had some great shows before they sold out...

But give the WB credit they did have Pete Ross on Smallville and Gunn on Angel...with great stories like...Gunn being yet another man who had to walk three feet behind Fred.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you for the tag! It's always a pleasure to see these little pearls of memories. 
    • Uh-oh. Today just might’ve been the first Paula/Jeanne stinker. I have a feeling whose fault that might be though. So, Doug III is getting a job at the Pub?  It’s good to see him interact with other characters. I enjoyed his scenes with Roman, even though the talk of Frankie and Max seemed a little random. And it also could be really interesting now that Tate knows. Days really need to start pushing their rivalry again. We need some follow up from the punch. Tying it all to Holly, to Sophia’s pregnancy, to the guys that Doug III owes money to could be good.  But yeah, wayyy too much Leo again in today’s episode. Seriously, has anything changed with this nothing character? I thought it was all Ron’s fault, but maybe Greg Rikaart is (partially) responsible for Leo being so insufferable.  And yeah seriously, Rafe needs to throw all of these people out of his house. Including Gabi

      Please register in order to view this content

      But I do wonder who’s the mysterious voice that Gabi overheard with EJ on the night he was shot. Based on yesterday’s episode, I have a suspicion. 
    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy