Jump to content

Victoria Rowell: "Debbi Morgan wanted to come to Y&R"


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think it's awesome that these actors are working, and I love that he's got this studio down in Atlanta and everything, but the sitcoms are just... sleepy. You're right, it's like they can't decide if they want to be sitcoms or what, and dramedy is GREAT on sitcoms (see clip below), but something's just missing here. It also looks like actors are ad-libbing (in dramatic scenes as well, there was a fight between a couple I saw the other day and they were stepping over each other's lines as if they were improv'ing it) which can have great results with the right direction, but again, something's just missing... the shows aren't tight enough.

They need to study THIS:

<object width="500" height="405"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/vHoKJcXoJV0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6&amp;border=1"></param><param'>http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/vHoKJcXoJV0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6&amp;border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/vHoKJcXoJV0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1?rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="405"></embed></object>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 400
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

PLEASE.... I have known and/or dated every "type" of person on QAF, it' the TRUTH and we just have to get a grip and deal. I have had many people tell me I have "exquisite" taste in all things, so dear, I have no issues there. And since QAF was Showtime's highest rated show for quite some time, many others agree with me. EVERY queen I knew watched that. Local bars threw PARTIES around the broadcast, for Pete's sake!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Nice try. ;-)

We've come a long way from "Beulah." I'm the first to acknowledge that, and the first to be grateful for it. Shows such as "The Cosby Show" and "Family Matters" took great pains to write mostly "color-blind" stories, and I'm grateful for that, too. Along the way, however, writers and producers alike fell into this line of thinking that it was enough just to portray us as something other "skinnin'-and-grinnin' coons." Guess what? It wasn't, and it isn't. You can't just put an upwardly mobile Black family in a nice® neighborhood and say well done. You have to flesh out these characters, too, and pay attention to things like "story" and "character development." IOW, the same aesthetic standards we all hold predominantly Caucasian shows to, we must hold predominantly Black shows to as well. We shouldn't give a particular series a free pass or a proverbial pat on the back just b/c it features Blacks who aren't somebody's maid or the whore. It should also follow filmmaker Billy Wilder's advice and not bore the audience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

As well as she should. SNL had no business promoting a "comic" who wasn't even being ironic in his sexist and misogynistic "humor." Frankly, I consider hiring him to guest-host a low point in that show's history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Tyler Perry might know his way around a good, spontaneous joke, but he has absolutely no "story sense" (a cardinal sin of entertainment, if you ask me), and he needs a director who knows how to work with performers, listening to their ideas and telling them what works and what doesn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

then why do so many in this thread say that lack of story for Black characters are the reason Y&R is losing viewers? Are you saying that if they wrote EVERY black character off the show, and the writing became good again, then it would get the black audience back? That makes sense to me, cause I watch fagless shows all the TIME... but Vicky sure don't see it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because, if that's what they're saying -- and I don't fault them for saying that -- then that's what they believe. I, however, believe differently. I believe Y&R's losing viewers for the same reason soaps in general are losing viewers: the stories, such as they are, are not engaging; and too much airtime is being devoured by actors and characters who simply don't deserve the attention. Period.

I'm saying if Y&R got back to being Y&R and stopped being THE EDGE OF NIGHT, it would lure back a lot of people who remembered what it was like to tune in everyday and enjoy what they were watching.

Besides, we all agree everyone, Black and White, watched Y&R back in the day to see Jill being fabulous and "Miss Chancellor" being rich. Right? ;-P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love moments like that. Moments when the audience forgets that what they're watching unfold is "make-believe," b/c the characters and story are just so engrossing. Remember when Edith Bunker, on "All in the Family," finally stopped her attempted rapist by shoving a burnt cake in his face, then ran out of her and Archie's house? You could almost feel the audience bleachers' shake, they were cheering and stamping so loudly. God, I wish I could write stuff that provoked that kind of reaction!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's the mouth and the voice, that kind of "bubble" in the throat sound, I dunno, hard to explain. But that of course is Chip Fields, Kim Fields' mother. Kim was also on the show as one of Penny's friends.

The audience was the unsung additional character of every scene, the best is the scene where Penny shoplifts at Christmas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

And all these years and we still don't have a black Miss Chancellor, can you imagine the pop culture icon she would be? A role Josephine Premice would have ROCKED.

There's still time for Jenifer Lewis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Uh-oh. Today just might’ve been the first Paula/Jeanne stinker. I have a feeling whose fault that might be though. So, Doug III is getting a job at the Pub?  It’s good to see him interact with other characters. I enjoyed his scenes with Roman, even though the talk of Frankie and Max seemed a little random. And it also could be really interesting now that Tate knows. Days really need to start pushing their rivalry again. We need some follow up from the punch. Tying it all to Holly, to Sophia’s pregnancy, to the guys that Doug III owes money to could be good.  But yeah, wayyy too much Leo again in today’s episode. Seriously, has anything changed with this nothing character? I thought it was all Ron’s fault, but maybe Greg Rikaart is (partially) responsible for Leo being so insufferable.  And yeah seriously, Rafe needs to throw all of these people out of his house. Including Gabi

      Please register in order to view this content

      But I do wonder who’s the mysterious voice that Gabi overheard with EJ on the night he was shot. Based on yesterday’s episode, I have a suspicion. 
    • Add me to the group of people who think that Brandon has improved. He has. There's no doubt about it. Especially compared to the beginning. And he's improving in a way that... it makes me think that he realizes what the issues are and is addressing them. Of course, he's no master of acting at this point... but I don't cringe as much as I did. And I've seen people in Bold... I won't even have to name names, because everyone knows who they are... who are becoming even worse than what they were offering in the first place. So... I'm happy that in BTG... people are actually blossoming and improving. It surely means that the atmosphere is creative and nurturing talent.  BUT and it's a big butt... his relationship with his husband is still so lacking and ghastly. I am craving to see more action from these guys. I want to see Smitty's character. If he has any. 
    • Thank you. You guys come to the rescue again. I'll take a look later.   Thank you for the info!!! Now I find myself less confused. You and @DRW50 are amazing.
    • I know Passions used this trope with Ethan and Sam to drag out the paternity, but GH seems to speed through certain stories while dragging others.
    • For any other soap, I think I’d agree, but GH, I don’t know

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Agreed, that there was some strange choices in the episode, especially at the end, but overall, that was some great drama that opens up the potential for so much future storyline. Kat vs. Eva having the most potential, especially over Tomas. I have mixed feelings about Martin/BC though. I thought he did pretty well in scenes with Smitty/MM, but the scenes of him confronting Leslie and of him throwing the books were bad lol she acted circles around him.  It’s similar to what Harding Lemay said about George Reinholt at AW; he could be brilliant in one scene, but then mediocre in the next. 
    • I know some of y'all really like Brooke Kerr, and so I've tried to give her a shot, despite her frequent flat line readings and distracted "did I leave the front door unlocked?" facial expressions. But lord, she is so bad at playing a tough-talking badass that I was actually rooting for Brad today to spill the beans to Drew. 
    • Googling does tend to ruin it.  For those of us who were teens in the late 1970s and early 1980s, you can't imagine how much fun it was to watch the show in the afternoons.  (It came on right after school.)  There weren't any "spoilers" at the time.  We would always try to anticipate how each crime and each mystery would be resolved, and we were ALWAYS wrong, because the stories are filled with so many weird twists and turns.   The head writer (Henry Slesar) and his dialogue writer (Steve Lehrman) invariably toss genuine clues directly into your face in the most unlikely ways, but then they provide a host of "red herrings" to completely confuse you and send you off on the wrong path.  Once the story reaches its conclusion, all you can think is Why didn't I figure that out weeks ago?  lol
    • Does the vault have the original scene and not the short flashback?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy