Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    5000

  • Taoboi

    4062

  • Cat

    4032

  • NothinButAttitude

    3991

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

OC and NJ have the most in common. If Bravo were smart, they'd add a shot of youth by making Kara a housewife now that she's rich. Can you imagine? We watched her grow up and now she's graduated to housewife. Even Briana is on enough that she could be a housewife. But in general they need to fire about half of their stale cast. Gretchen and Alexis need to go.

 

In other news, Ana from RHOM will be co-hosting The View. Pretty impressive that they're having her since she isn't even one of the stars. I wonder if that means she's in contention for an actual position on the show. I could see them considering her. I know she's nuts, but if they were smart they'd consider Jill, Alex McCord ( love her fashion reporting since she left), Nene and Phaedra as well. The show has gone beyond what it used to be and I would prefer a real tv person to these actresses they keep adding. At least then you'd have a different perspective with some being lawyers and business women. Alex could be a good Mommy to have on, plus her fashion reporting and interest in tv and film. Phaedra could provide comedy and legal advice. Nene could add a huge personality, but it probably too uneducated about most issues. Ana could provide legal advice and of course is a chef. Then you have Jill who has such a large personality and is a hot mess, which would be perfect for The View.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
hold up, she was hosting? What a bad choice. Not like she'd bring in many viewers. I read on Wiki that she was a guest in season 1. I don't even remember her but really I don't remember anything about season 1 except for that ghetto ass reunion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Dont' hate! Don't hate! tongue.png They might be bringing her on there to co-host and then cook at the end too because she's well-received (for cooking) in Miami.

Not with that haircut he ain't. tongue.png I'd put a bag over it until at least he grows his hair back or get hair transplant, something! Joe Gorga season 3-4 was f--kable to me.

I am sorry but I disagree. One thing I can say about this entire franchise is when fans aren't stupid and when they aren't entertained or it's too dark, the ratings drop like flies instantly.

Case in point, NYC season 4. Ratings instantly dropped from season 3, which was their glory season and Bethenny might've played a point in that but to some, the show got stale and dark.

IMO, Kenya's antics saved RHOA from a dramatic drop, which would've occurred had she not been there to stir the pot, and Bravo having these women go on every media outlet he could book them on.

And honestly, I want the OC to flourish but Andy needs to drastically shake this cast up, getting rid of root of the problem for this show--the "quartet"--Vicki, Tamra, Gretchen, Alexis. Get rid of these four, keep Heather and Bucky, and cast 5 new, strong, wealthy women to star beside them and show could go well. I like RHOC and want to see it do well but these past two season are stale. The cast dynamic is stale. The drama is stale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It just don't look right and it f-cks up his face and everything. I mean I'd probably still give in if he was gay and did try too press up against me IRL, but afterwards I'd tell him to grow that hair back. He was sexier with it. But then again, thinking about it . . . I probably wouldn't give in b/c I'd have to deal with Teresa and I'd shoot b*tch from day one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ha! Gorga's got the kind of body where you don't care if a certain part of his anatomy is merely average... smile.png The man is jacked! (though he'll never hold a candle to my all-time fave, ATL's Ed Hartwell... and you KNOW *that* guy ain't merely average! lol okay I'll stop)

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree those ladies have run their course. All 4 mentioned are unlikable. I used to like Gretchen, but now that I've been watching more consistently, I see how whiny and petty she is alongside the other blondies. And what the eff did she do to her face??? How old is she, and she's getting all Joan Rivers on us already? Oy... Like seriously, when we saw that profile shot of her in the limo, it was like someone was behind her, holding strings to make her face look so pulled back. Her jaw makes a 45 degree angle north towards her ears.

The thing is though, Heather and Bucky Beaver aren't all that dynamic (Bucky is brand new, so to wipe her out would be like ousting NYC's Cindy), so with 4 new ladies and these 2, it would basically be a brand new show with the same title.

Edited by Gray Bunny
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Just caught up on the OC... Things are heating up! I really enjoyed the Mexico trip and next weeks episode look really good too!

Heather just doesn't fit with these girls. I like her but after a second season I'm just not feeling a good gel here. She's sort of like the mom, but in a tightass way. She needs to loosed up with these girls or go to BH.

I cannot believe that Vicki peed on Tamras bed. Omg!!! That [!@#$%^&*] was gross but hilarious. Loved tamras reaction!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's NBC right? That must mean they still may have some plans for her.

How much of the Beverly Hills feuding do you think is real and how much isn't?

Speaking of BH, I was in a drug store and saw some cover which mentioned Kyle's husband and a man. Didn't really care about reading it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation.  I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
    • Elements of it were silly, but it was a small price to pay to get Zas back. I should say there's a difference between in town and out of town returns. It's understandable for Roger to skulk around town in a bad wig and clown suit when he's in Springfield and running the risk of bumping in to people he knows.  Taking us out of town to find someone always has a short shelf life. Then it usually becomes about another character knowing X is alive but determined to keep them out of Springfield. Like Alan discovering Amish Reva. I don't know how long it went on, but it was probably twice as long as necessary.
    • Elizabeth Dennehy complained on the Locher Room about how ridiculous so much of the writing was for Roger's return. She laughed at so much of Roger's antics and how it was hard for her to take them seriously. Probably another reason she was fired as she didn't play the game.  
    • Only thing I enjoyed was Abby / Olivia, etc., and the addiction storyline. Otherwise, I could do without the season.
    • Right? Vanessa had a ball gown for every occasion.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy