Jump to content

Bravo's The Real Housewives of....


Cheap21

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Cheap21

    5000

  • Taoboi

    4063

  • Cat

    4032

  • NothinButAttitude

    3991

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • Members

Erika is such a moron. Garcelle's son looked absolutely shocked by what you said. Appalling. 

They all come off poorly here, but the worst is Mauricio. What a jerk. 

WOW. That scene with Sutton is outrageous. The way she put her hands on Sutton was aggressive and totally inappropriate. I was hoping Sutton would slap her. And that comment about "we don't know" about her miscarriages is disgusting.

I've said it from the start: Kyle is a bad person. She's proven it this week. 

This show needs a major overhaul indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Kyle seems drunk off her ass in that clip. I wonder what Kim would say...

And of course this will turn into claiming Sutton is lying. Maybe they can have a RHOD crossover where Greg Abbott demands her medical records. 

Normally I might say if you call someone soulless you aren't going to expect anything back but Diana is so genuinely disturbing in this shot that it just backs up Sutton's comment. She looks like the whorehouse madam who is about to get the ingenue hooked on heroin. 

@Chris B @Cat Ah my mistake about Kyle not knowing. I suppose I am not sure why she is so willing to seem so vile oncamera, but then she has done all this before and usually anyone she targets leaves, so she probably thinks she will win again. I can't say she's wrong to feel that way, although I hope she is. 

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Taoboi it's a whole ass mess. Honestly, a fulsome apology from Kyle and Erika (saying they were hopelessly drunk) to Garcelle and one from Kyle to Sutton would have reined this mess in. But nothing for a couple of days, and now this is truly A Thing. They are complete fools to think this was somehow going to 'show up' Garcelle or Sutton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@DRW50 Your description of Diana is creepily on point. I didnt think Sutton covered herself in glory with the way she treated Diana in Mexico, but her revelling in Sutton being questioned about her miscarriages is like a spider watching a fly get tangled in its web. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

RHONJ:

Apparently Melissa vs Jackie, Jackie and Tre are friendly...Delores and Margie are besties.

And supposedly Jackie is back full time.

We shall see.

RHOBH:

Housewives is toxic and the vast majority of the fans are kinda toxic.  

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is so wrong. No need to bring Portia into it, she's a child like Jax. I cannot imagine how traumatic it must be for this young girl to have hoardes of crazy strangers come at you on Twitter.

It does sound pretty good and a solid mix-up of previous cast dynamics. As you say, though, I don't need to see the Tr*mp fangirl celebrating the opening salvo of a wholesale removal of my autonomous decision-making rights. I get that enough with the real time news cycle.

Edited by Cat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The most shocking thing about Kyle's statement is the complete omission of an apology when it came to Garcelle and Jax. She does mention apologizing to Sutton, but when it comes to the two Black people she merely is making excuses so she doesn't look bad. The fact that she couldn't even muster a fake "I'm sorry if I offended you" is shocking. She really doesn't seem to care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I’m curious about BH. I haven’t watched the show in many years, but the chatter around it is inescapable, particularly in recent weeks. That chatter has taken an ugly turn into allegations of racism towards Erika, Diana, Rinna, and Kyle, but I’m wondering if Bravo will have any motivation to make changes if ratings stay high and social media conversations stay active. Diana seems like an easy sacrificial lamb, but I’d like to be a fly on the wall in network meetings. All publicity isn’t necessarily good publicity these days. I guess as usual we’ll have to see how the reunion shakes out. They’ve placed Garcelle in such a difficult position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Such an arrogant decision on her part. Kyle doesn't care at all. 

Fire up the spit because that particular pig is about to get roasted.

I think Garcelle is in a great position - the audience loves her and the edit is showing these hags for what they really are. The accusations being hurled against Erika, Diana, Rinna, and Kyle are not unwarranted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • The actor who plays Martin has been teasing that nobody has guessed Martin's secret. I love that for things like that and the June story we have no idea. I feel like if we didn't have the day ahead feeds Anita's reveal would've been shocking as well. I love that they aren't going the obvious route with these stories. 
    • I tried following the news in Los Angeles at https://laist.com (independent public radio and news) They had up-to-the minute accurate info during the wildfires in January. There's no video, no impact to my mind as to what's happening. Trying other outlets, to get the truth, but it's hard.  
    • That's a bit murky since that happened during a writers' strike. Assuming Kristen Marie had a 2-year contract she left about when her contract would have expired and Sharlene and Josie showed up right before that. Lemay was officially credited as HW from September 1988 but it seems very probable that his anticipated tenure influenced events that happened during the strike which started in April. 
    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy