Jump to content

The Sud's Report 3/12/10


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I think that not having connections to the wider canvas made it easier to get rid of these characters, but the decision-making process seems more based on FV and RC's perception of these characters and their place in their future stories. The rumor at the Daytime Emmys was that Frons told FV to cut OLTL's budget by 20%. We speculated that the second tier minority characters would would be the first to go, but the first firing to our surprise was John Botherton. Jared was married to Natalie and had a father married to Vicki so why fire him? I thought he was a horrible actor and getting rid of the character was a step in the right direction, but instead of following it up by sweeping out more of the useless featured characters like John, Todd, Tea, Rex, Gigi, and Jessica, they do the predictable thing and dump the lower paid less harmful characters. At this rate, they will run out of characters to support the main characters' stories. They will have to hire day players or new short term actors. Perhaps that is less expensive so that is the plan. In any case, I think that the whole thing is like tossing the children and women off the ship in hopes that the men and luggage will be rescued before it sinks. Good luck with that. All they are doing is delaying the inevitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Wrong again Nelson. Several AMC actors have said that their new dressing rooms are way smaller than the dressing rooms they had in New York. And while they were given TVs (which, given the size of the dressing rooms, cannot be anything close to "huge") as a way of saying "Sorry for the really sh*tty dressing rooms", they have to pay a fee if they want to actually use them!

I'm surprised he didn't just report that his "sources" are telling him all the OLTL cast cuts going on are so the AMC studio can be pimped out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Angry Dante was hot; sorry, but I'm not going to pretend it wasn't awesome seeing Dominic Zamprogna act his ass off in a way that was not crying.
    • Thanks, interesting and so believable (no Lonatrat or Clones...)Instead of the Lewis family he should have made the Oil family Granger...even if the audience didn't remember that one off character it would have been interesting to tie it into the fictional GL world.
    • Dante needs stick removed from his butt
    • When you bring up what I like to call "Shapiro's Folly" you think Dano's acting choices mattered? I ask because I don't think so. As far as I could tell almost universally the ABC fans hated the very idea of her being on all 4 shows! And, BTW, the headwriters also hated it, at least according to comments made by Passanante. But, it is not hard to imagine that they'd feel that way. And, I agreed. If she wanted success she should have planted "Rae" on one & given up her idea of branding, or whatever it was that she was after.  
    • Okay, well her reasons were that she had a mandate to reduce the size of the cast & she had another mandate to make the cast overall younger, so her reason for picking Donna to off was because she was too old.  So, is that what you understand? Or are you thinking of something else? Which if so, I would be delighted to hear about it!  She had arbitrarily picked 50 as the age people needed to be younger than.  And, that is why she got rid of both Bridget & Spencer Harrison.  And, getting rid of Bridget was another of her horrible ideas.  Why do you refer to her as the Face of the Show? Don't feel bad. I am a major Cass fan & I don't remember him with Donna either, LOL! Can we say forgettable? And, yes, Lila was the most last minute of last minutes!!!! 
    • This is AWESOME, thank you for taking the time to post this! My first thought: My memory is a lot better than I thought it was, LOL! The first episode I clearly remember watching had a scene of Ed confronting Holly about Christina's paternity. He lamented how wonderful things had been over Christmas, so looks like I started watching the show early 1976. The only thing puzzling me is where is Evie? I thought she was around BEFORE Rita got involved with Tim, but maybe that's one gap in my memory. It makes Rita look slightly better--in that case, she didn't seduce Tim knowing her sister had a crush on him.
    • Oh, well.  At least he can cry into his hoodie.
    • Sorry, just realized I'd somehow lost a whole paragraph in that last post.
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  They should have brought Billy back in the early '90s for more drama with Hart and Blake. Maybe Blake would have gotten involved with him to try to ruin him in Roger's eyes, but realize under his sweet nature, Billy was a player himself.
    • Checked. Taggert last date, Wed, 7-19-23, so a long dadgummed time ago.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy