Jump to content

ABC: New Yorker's may lose ABC 7 Channel


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Saw this at We Love Soaps, and it pertains to ABC soaps, and probably some of the poster's here:

http://www.welovesoaps.net/2010/03/will-cablevision-continue-to-carry-abc.html#more

As of Monday March 8 soap fans may not get to see their soaps if they have Cablevision and live in Long Island, Westchester, Brooklyn, the Bronx and selected suburbs of Connecticut and New Jersey because for the past two years ABC7 has tried, without success, to reach an agreement with Cablevision to carry ABC7. Why? Because Cablevision’s position is that "ABC7 is worth little to nothing to its business and its proposed offers have been consistently unreasonable and unrealistic." Fans can visit www.saveABC7.com to make their voices heard and for details on how to switch providers.

Below is a copy of an open letter from President and General Manager of ABC7, Rebecca Campbell.

  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members
Posted

This ALWAYS happens with big media giants and then there's a last-minute save because neither one wants to be without the other. If Cablevision drops ABC, it's highly unlikely that ratings would drastically drop. I'd imagine the use of OTA antennas is probably higher in bigger cities, given that coverage is likely way stronger.

  • Members
Posted

Yeah, the commercials keep popping up, just like when they dropped the Food Network. It's crazy. I have an antenna anyway, but I doubt it'll come to this.

  • Members
Posted

Everyone I know who has cablevision doesn't care they said drop them, hardly any of them watch ABC-7 anyway and you can see the shows online, if it comes to that.

No one wants to pay higher fees, cablevision charges an arm and a leg already, and isn't ABC-7 suppose to be free.

  • Members
Posted

Living in Manhattan I can tell you that your reception varies greatly depending on your window exposure. The days of huge TV antennas on roofs is long over so now it would be basically rabbit ears and hoping you point toward the Empire State Building or wherever the antenna is these days. The Greater NYC market I believe represents something like 10% of all TV sets, so if you lost Cablevision ratings would probably drop about 5% give or take a % or two.

  • Members
Posted

When I lived in the city, I had Time Warner cable which I MUCH prefer to Cablevision which is what I had in Westchester. Time Warner had more channels (especially the little obscure ones that I liked), a cooler display/grid, just overall more bang for my buck. On this evening's news they did a story on this, it was kind of funny, the anchors trying to make it VERY clear that if you have Cablevision it isn't the end of the road, just go to Best Buy and buy a $40 digital converter or switch your cable provider/get a dish, I mean they were giving you step-by-step to keep your viewership. :D

  • Members
Posted

When we realized that most of the cable shows we watch are readily available online, we ditched the cable (but kept the internet) and bought a converter box and high powered antenna. It feels the same. Except on Saturdays and Sundays when you're stuck in the house and you miss marathoning those VH1 countdown shows. :P

  • Members
Posted

What do you mean the days of antennas on roofs are over? If you own your property, remember that according to FCC regulations, no Homeowner's association can prohibit you from having a rooftop antenna. But close into town, you can get a "small" rooftop antenna, and simply put it in your attic or in a closet, and you'll get reception just fine, more reliable than rabbit ears. and the picture quality is TONS better, like the difference between VHS and DVD. And for those who live in basement apartments and such, there's other cable providers to switch to.

  • Members
Posted

They just did an update on the news a few minutes ago and the head of Cablevision has refused to be interviewed by WABC. The signal is scheduled to be cut right before the Oscars on Sunday and Cablevision is saying that's extortion. :o

  • Members
Posted

Seriously, I think buying a converter box and a good quality antenna plus a standard Netflix subscription has saved me so much money I would have spent on cable. Too bad there's no way around the cost of high speed internet.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Recent Posts

    • All I can think of is if a lot of big names were leaving around that time she wanted him back as a stopgap, although I have never seen any real evidence that he was popular with GH viewers.
    • I loved watching Shanice hand Leslie her ass and finally shutting her up. It was so good. I also love Martin & Smitty's family.  Anita has to have some sort of plan giving Leslie the tickets to mail for Winterfest. She has to be setting her up for a fall. It's pretty obvious to me Vernon is not cheating with Sharon. I think Sharon is helping him with his terrible singing voice for Winterfest. I still believe Bill & Dani are endgame but I love Dani & Andre too. I am definitely enjoying this story. And making Hayley a black widow is a nice twist.
    • Sorry for the spam. Wasn't sure where to put this, it's from Tony Geary's husband's IG. Tony watching Genie and Maurice on Mo's show.
    • This show is really trundling along BTW. When is someone going to show up to slit Beastmaster's throat or crack the whip on metrosexual Sidwell? (BTW, openly presenting this cheery bon vivant as casually bisexual would at least be something vaguely diverting.) At least kill Brennan by year's end. I'm bored.
    • She told Vanessa to "DOUBLE her offer" on the Jarvis house.  The Jarvis family accepted the doubled price.  Assuming the house has an appraised value of $2,000,000, she's theoretically paid the Jarvis family $4,000,000 for the house.  The bank would loan Leslie 80% of the appraised value ($1,600,000), and Leslie had to pay the balance with cash at closing --- $2,200,000.  She only had ONE million.  Where the hell did she get the rest?!  And now she's got contractors working on the house all day & half the night.  Who's paying THEM?  I keep thinking all this will crash around her.  Either that or the writers have absolutely no idea the limits of a million dollars.  Sounds like a "lot of money", but it obviously ain't when we look at Leslie's spending since she got that million dollar check in August.     
    • Maree Cheatham     pg. 403

      Please register in order to view this content

            MATLOCK Sister Peggy (1) 2025   Ray Wise    pg. 428 movie THE WOLF IN THE WELL    Roland Carmel    2024 THE NAPA BOYS    Officer Toland   2025   PodCast HAVOC TOWN      Josiah Abbess       2025    
    • Vernon is an idiot. Why would he have Sharon in the same hotel that Leslie is staying at?
    • Yes, that out of the blue return was odd. Maybe GG found a forgotten clause in the contract he signed when he was wooed to ABC and they were forced to take him back! Like George Reinholt he talked about the contract that promised him primetime roles. But it was loaded in the networks favor. I think it was Gloria Loring that re-signed at Days on the promise of primetime opportunities, but that was all it was- she was put up for guest spots and TV movies but not necessarily guaranteed that she get the role.
    • I still am baffled by why Monty brought back stunt hire Gerald Gordon in the early '80s out of nowhere for like a year. I haven't found anyone who can come up with a thing he did in that second stint of note.
    • It's interesting to watch this having watched The Doctors. I'm not sure I'm seeing that much of a difference in the characters Gerald Gordon and Anna Stuart played on The Doctors and what they're playing here.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy