Members DRW50 Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 I'm not all that fond of Sharon Case when she tries to play hysteria. She and Eileen Davidson both doing that seems like a recipe for unwatchability. That couch Sharon is on is so ugly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MoTheGreat Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 As long as she loses Nick. I don't care who else they throw her at. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted March 3, 2010 Author Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 Why am I not surprised Amanda L. Beall wrote this horrible piece of sh!t episode? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MoTheGreat Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 Oh, no you didn't. That is some funny shitznit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members classicmoment Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 I wholeheartedly agree, I was just telling my SIL (she's watching and I just walked in) that both actresses deserve so much better than this and Joh Morrow is starting to look into his character again. I'm also not minding Muhney here. The writing still sucks though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MoTheGreat Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 Welcome! The only way to save the show is to get a bunch of people to stop watching. Once the ratings go down they will switch writers with the quickness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted March 3, 2010 Author Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 I find Sharon's white coat in one of the sequence to be horrid and cheap looking. What giant size teddy bear did they skin to make that retched thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members DeeeDee Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 Hey Bartender...a round of WINs for all of us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted March 3, 2010 Author Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 The sh!tty lighting on this show totally washes out the look of the sets and all the props. These sets were not designed for such bright and harsh lighting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 What was so awful about it? Other than the production, I don't see what was wrong with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Y&RWorldTurner Posted March 3, 2010 Author Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 Y&R's current lighting design? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alphanguy74 Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 As much as one would like to think it's budget constraints causing this, I just don't see that. After all, although this show had BUDGET in the 80's and 90's, Conboy didn't have SQUAT to work with, yet his lighting set the tone for the entire show and won an Emmy. (though Dickson went on record saying she HATED IT) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 "The Young and the Restless." This portion sponsored by Wal-Mart. Save money. Look like sh!t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members classicmoment Posted March 3, 2010 Members Share Posted March 3, 2010 The production is of all kinds of stink Paul Raunch needs to be demoted or be gone. The acting not overdone was very engaging. I liked all the primary players today. the writing still stinks though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.fbb6aa067610794e36433d57928a2f42.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.