Jump to content

B&B: February 2010 Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Monday's episode is classic! GREAT script! Love Taylor. Love Steffy. Love Brooke whose finally lost her kindergarden teacher's voice. Love that Stephanie might actually be doing something soon. Love Katie and Bill. Good to see Eric back.

My only complaint...why giving the company back to the Forresters, why did Steffy forget Thorne and Felicia? Stephanie I can understand, but giving the final ownership to Taylor is suiting her agenda. Makes her no better than the Logan's. That spot should've gone to Thorne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Why do they insist on those cheesy effects? The "division of Spencer Pub" bs? You can't tell me it wouldn't have been cheaper to plant some temp sign on the grounds at "Forrester" for Ridge to take a sledgehammer/bulldozer/ravenous beaver to. Instead of paying for some CGI techno-geek's time, knowing there was no way to make it look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That reminds me. At the Daytime Emmys Thorne said in an interview with Navell that he'd have a storyline soon. It hadn't been written yet, but Brad Bell already told him what the story was and it sounded good. Obviously nothing happened and I refuse to believe he plots that far in advance. I wonder if that was just a way to sucker him into signing a contract or was it a real story that got dropped?

I wonder what kind of contract he has. Why would they sign him to four more years to appear twice a month?

This whole soap is a cheeseball! I love it! Only on B&B could you have Hunter Tylo doing what she does alongside Heather Tom. Only on B&B could you have a character like Brooke as your lovable heroine. Only on B&B could you have sex with the girl you raised as your daughter. Only on B&B would your matriarch strangle your heroine. B&B is full of cheese and camp. I'm glad they went all out with the cheesy CGI. It was hilarious. The entire episode was hilarious. It was a classic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Brad's not gonna write for him, why would he want him on a contract? I think Brad has best-of-intentions, but then gets distracted (ooh, Ric Hearst is free! Ooh, so is Sarah Brown! That Conroy fella from GL was cool)...and everything is in the air. In this week's SOD, Lesli Kay says straight up she's not sure there will be a place for Felicia when ATWT is done. So she knows the score....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think thats wishful thinking. I thought it was going to stand for Thorne considering they were meeting in Thorne's office but he wasnt even invited. This is clearly a plot point to start up the Taylor/Ridge/Brooke triangle YET again. Its about that time of year. I cant beleive she owns 25% of Forrester now and that neither Ridge, Eric nor Stephanie said anything about that, especially Eric. Thorne be damned. I did have to laugh at the silly Logan twits assuming REST stood for Ridge Eric Sustainable Trust. They looked so dumb

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steffy's biggest accomplishment, so far, is sex with her uncle... no one in the family wonders how the twit was able to wrest control of FC away from a cutthroat mogul? Just when you think this show can't get any dumber, the writers meet the downward challenge and blow the show's credibility to the wind!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I wouldnt say Winsoer isnt working. They simply arent using him. I think they stopped caring for Thorne once Nick came on the show as Ridge's other younger blonde brother and even now they arent even playing that connection. Thorne's last significant story was when he was with Taylor, like 3 years ago? I thought he and Katie had potential but that sizzled almsot as soon as it started. I still think he could work, if only they'd use him

I think right now they are just so caught up in the moment and happy to think about that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • That's true. He may have ended up keeping her on a recurring basis, like Dr. Michaels on ATWT. I'm trying to remember if GL had a similar long-running therapist.
    • Oh in terms of ratings I think it would have been in a dicey place probably even before then. I mostly was just thinking of if the show could have carried on creatively. 
    • Even if by some miracle Knots Landing continued, 1994/95 it would have been killed by ER.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Assuming that Marland had been allowed to write the Carrie story the way he'd envisioned, Millette would've been involved in the story. And she might've played a role in Andy Norris' return (if the speculation on that had ever materialized, and Marland loved bringing back bad boys) But he doesn't seem interested in Sara's personal life. And the women of Springfield could only be analyzed so much.
    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I like Margaret well enough in what I've seen of her as Paige - she is green but she has real star power.  I agree about the actor who plays Brian. He's...mostly just there. Not bad but not great.  My main issue is with the guy who plays Owen. He's just not appealing to me. I can believe Nola being obsessed with him, but he's draining to watch.  I'm surprised people objected to the quasi-incest elements as it wasn't anything that new for soaps.  Speaking of Kim, here's a rare episode of an anthology show she did called The Evil Touch.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    •   I get what you're both saying, and I think the show was lucky to have even made it that long, but I think they could have still maintained a certain audience - Second Chances did before the earthquake. CBS was an older network anyway. I think the premise of Knots was still usable, it was more the characters who were a problem - many of the older figures were played out. If the show had done a better job building up its younger cast instead of making so many poor choices in the late '80s and early '90s, they could have kept things going a little longer. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy