Jump to content

January 4-8, 2010


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Dropping current storylines, bringing back a handful of familiar yet useless vets, and wrapping everything up with a tight little bow will signal the real END of the world and destroy any chance of a flip to a new network. Lifetime, nor any other network, will pick up a show made up of 70somethings having heart attacks instead of romantic heart ache. Hey, forget heart break, heartburn is serious and product placements for Tums will be fun! Ellen, and all the other castaways, will do nothing to raise ratings. ATWT is not a Golden Girls redux. The vets should have been pushed off stage a long time ago. The new generation of Bob, Lisa, Kim and Nancy types deserve a turn. Sex, affairs, breaking up and making up drive ratings. GH, Days, and Y&R all overtook World Turns by reducing vets and focusing on youthful story. Even under Marland, ratings, especially in key demos, sagged. It isn't pretty but the numbers speak for themselves.

Maybe Y&R will keep all its vets and someday change its name to The Old and the Listless? I just can't wait to watch Nikki battle Depends diaper rash!

BTW, I like the Mick story, love NutMeg, and want to learn more about Hunter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Weren't they?

If a casual viewer tuned into this show, would they really say, "Where are the young people?"

The show has spent years shoving young people at viewers. Aaron, Gwen, Will, Lucy, Maddie. Parker and Liberty, Allison and Casey, and many others who are below middle age, like Paul, Katie, Brad, Meg, Janet, Dusty.

DAYS has showcased their vets over the past year and their ratings have increased.

If you give stories to interesting people who can act, then the age doesn't matter.

The stories that helped take Y&R in the ratings were heavily focused on older characters like Katherine Chancellor.

DAYS lost a million or more viewers when they dumped vets in the early 80s to try to hype bright young things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Why would Nikki have a story like that? Katherine doesn't, and she's 20-30 years older than Nikki.

When Y&R tried to hype younger Sabrina over Nikki as Victor's great love, ratings crashed.

Focusing on dead-eyed, worthless new faces like Daisy who can't act and can barely speak -- is that the way of the future? I'd say it's what has killed soaps.

Y&R has the worst younger cast of any soap. To give control of the show to them just because they're young is a good way to say goodbye to the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Do you think soaps should maybe have a limited life span--sort of like a Telenovela? I do not see how a soap can last without the 'next generation' taking over. In fact, such a thing is very true to life. Within a family, The 'thirtysomethings' usually take control and older gen takes on a new role in the family. As for Y&R, Daisy is probably there for plot. As for the rest of the youth, they will almost all be recast. I'm more talking about actors like Nick, Sharron, Adam, Cloe, and Victoria. The kids on any show tend to be weak. World Turns has actually done an okay job in this regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe Nick, Sharon, Adam, Chloe, or Victoria can carry the show in the future. The characters are a mess and Heinle and Morrow can barely even get through a scene. Y&R has managed to thoroughly dismantle most of their 20/30/40 set over this decade.

I think current Y&R is dragged down by the inability to build new characters, and because of the need to destroy so many, young and old, for Victor, because they cling to him. He makes it easier for them to not have to develop the show. If they were going to dump any older character I would pick him.

I think the way a next generation takes over a show is for them to be eased in over time, and prove they are capable of lifting their weight. You can still keep some older characters and over time give them less of a role. When a soap takes an "out with the old" attitude, they just alienate viewers without having anything to back it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Didn't Bill Bell rip his show apart in the early 80's and get rid of the Brook's family. I do agree change should happen over time. In the case of a show in trouble like World Turns, there isn't enough time and bold writers need to take risks. I'm not saying Goutman or any of the current writers are bold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. Bill Bell thought the Brooks and Fosters had been recast too many times, and since the most popular actors of those families, like David Hasslehoff and finally Jamie Lyn Bauer, were leaving, he decided to phase the families out, aside from Jill, and build up already existing characters (Jack, Paul, Victor).

His storytelling ability is probably what made this work.

People on soaps don't bother to tell stories now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Another good example could be when Marland utted GH, saving it from the ax. It has, and can be done again, with the right writer. I doubt we'd agree on who could fix ATWT. I say Jack Smith or Latham. I don't totally fault Latham for the drop in ratings: all soaps were falling at that time. There was no way for her to maintain the numbers and I liked how she put Gloria, Michael, Lauren, and Kevin front and center. Latham's Y&R was the only time I actually enjoyed watching. Aside from that time, it was never MY show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The ratings didn't fall that much under Latham, did they? I can't remember. I thought that was more MAB.

Marland wrote for a lot of preexisting GH characters. Scott, Laura, Lesley, Monica, Rick, Jeff. He did bring in some new faces but also tried to respect the past. That's what soaps don't bother with now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We could check in the Y&R room to make sure but I know i was under Latham. I remember everyone ripping on the poor woman who has done a lot of great work: Homefont and Knots Landing. I'm pretty sure they lost close to one mil under her and MAB helped to get the show stable again with modest gains. Go figure, I think the show was so much better back then. MAB big story was the Kay/Madge car crash, a arc everyone praised but I found to be lame. I was way more into Brad and the Holcaust art. Plus, she knew how to use Gloria. The 'Fishers' were on their way to being the new Abbots. I love Lauren's character and she was so utilized. Now, she isn't even under contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, for those of us who have been long term fans of Y&R, that hack bitch from the depths of hell LML decimated the show. Brad and the Holocaust art and his thighs of death was just the start of a domino effect of crap.

The Fishers as the new Abbotts...that completely illustrates LML's problem she wanted to take the show and make it HER show. That belly flopped hard.

That said, Ma Bell from Beverly Hills is taking a big wrecking ball to Y&R now, it's unwatchable.

Yay for DAYS is all I can say, it's the best soap on the air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Stop right there.

If PGP had any remote interest in "saving ATWT" they would have either a.) Sold it for a buck, as you so put it in one of your first topics here or b.) Found a new home and done everything they could financially to make that happen.

I don't buy this whole, "PGP wanted out of the soap business was just a rumor" thing. They haven't even bothered developing any new soap ventures, neither online nor on broadcast/cable television. They never bothered pumping real effort into ATWT and ESPECIALLY GL's revamp and opted for a guerilla-style videography. Which is fine if you're doing cable access. But not for a network television series, daytime or otherwise.

I'll be brief...

For ATWT to make that cable move, that would probably mean the end of the characters you are complaining about. So I don't know why you are even bringing them into the equation.

Also, you may be right...absolutely right in that older characters do not skew good demos and numbers(even though a show you just mentioned was a solid performer on Lifetime for years, that constantly delivered younger female demos every evening). But even if that is the case, it HELPS to have characters like Kim, Bob, and Lisa there to at least be a sounding board or a point of history for the younger characters. Soaps simply cannot exist without a family/community/multi-generational aspect. Cut people like Kim, Bob, and Lisa or don't bring back characters that audiences remember even for short visits or to introduce aged younger characters, then there really IS no ATWT.

:huh:

GH is in the same position that ATWT is in. That show just has better demos and the support of the network. Y&R and DAYS have loyal fans and people who sample the show as a "flavor of the week." We still don't know if DAYS will be able to keep their second wind.

And just because it "drives ratings" doesn't make it a good show. You can't have it both ways...do you want a show with great, suspenseful storytelling with occassional unpredictable twists born from the characters you grew up loving? Or do you want sensational, trashy stories? The direction ATWT has taken in the last five-ten years has had the whole "SEX! AFFAIRS! BREAKING/MAKING UP!" But that does not constitute a story. And apparently, the audience agrees because they all left.

You are entitled to your own opinion as am I. It's my opinion that your rationale and the fans and corporate heads that think like you are the reason why ATWT is getting axe and why daytime is in the shape it's in.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is funny to me how people ignore this. It is pure science, scientifically proven facts. This graph doesn't lie — LML actually gained viewers and then lost some in 2007.

Whereas Alden and Smith are epic disasters of mythic proportions!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
    • Not having watched AMC was one of the reasons I hesitated to make the comparison, tbf. It's odd--I feel like I could argue Cassie, Olivia, Harley and Dinah suffocated the show along with Reva the last five years.
    • Laurie and Lance accompany Leslie to her Denver concert and she relies me on Lance for support.Unbeknownst to Leslie, Brad has had the operator make a special connection to the concert hall so he can hear her concert. The Maestro, realizing Leslie’s emotional torment over her failing marriage, tries to persuade her to tell Brad about the baby, and when she refuses, he writes a letter to Brad betraying Leslie’s confidence. After another fight with her mother about how learning about her parentage has upset her life, Laurie confides to Leslie that she feels cut off, outside. Stuart overhears this conversation, and Leslie has to tell him the whole story. She tries to explain fairly how Jennifer had left Stuart and actually only spent one night with Bruce, and faced the truth about Laurie only when she was forced to. Stuart is livid over this |betrayal and wants to confront his wife ‘now, but her doctor calls. Her one-year mastectomy checkup was fine, but he’s discovered irregularities in her cardiogram and doesn’t want her under any stress until further tests can be made. Stuart assures Leslie he won’t tell her mother he knows about Laurie until he can do it calmly, and doesn’t tell his daughter about the cardiogram.  When Chris continues to receive obscene calls, Snapper goes straight to the Beckers’. Ron insists he was home with Nancy, and she corroborates this. When she steps between an advancing Snapper and her husband, screaming, “We don’t have a telephone. He couldn't have called Chris,” Snapper finally has to believe her, and he leaves. But moments later Karen tells Nancy that Daddy went out while Mommy was in the shower. Ron insists it was just a few moments, for cigarettes. Nancy lets it pass, but the next morning finds a whole carton of cigarettes in a drawer  and asks why he went out. Ron coldly tells her she’d  better pull herself together, she’s letting this thing with Chris make her a little insane. Nancy ponders telling Chris but decides that all Chris would do is  badmouth Ron again, and she and Karen have no one but Ron and can’t leave him. When a telephone-installation man arrives with their new phone, Nancy asks him not to put it in. But Ron arrives and orders the installation made, telling Nancy she’s trying to run his life, as his mother did. When Nancy tries to call Chris, Ron frighteningly tells Nancy he’s done  everything they said he did, but it’s all her fault, as she never gave him what he needed. When he informs her he’s taking Karen away from her before she can ruin her, Nancy collapses in a catatonic state. Ron then calmly calls the hospital and requests help for his wife, “Fran Jackson,” who has had a breakdown.  Laurie, seeing the extent to which Vanessa will go to keep Lance to herself, warns Lance that his mother’s possessive feelings are unhealthy. Lance suggests Vanessa will consider Leslie a threat also when he learns that Les and Brad are divorcing and things will get easier. As soon as the hospital attendants leave with Nancy, Ron dials Legal Aid and has Karen tell Chris she’s all alone. Stopping only to leave a message for Snapper about where she’s going, Chris rushes to the Beckers’ apartment, only to realize that Ron’s tricked her. Ron sends Karen out of the room and, after expressing his hatred for all women, tells Chris he’s going to prove to her he’s a man. But Karen wanders back in as he has Chris pinned to the wall, and Ron’s mind snaps when he realizes his daughter has seen his perverted side. After smashing the wall mirror, he runs out, and Greg, terrified at learning where Chris is, arrives to find her comforting Karen. Chris takes Karen home, and after several days of fruitless searching for Nancy, she applies for temporary guardianship of Karen. Peggy and Jack set a New Years Eve wedding date, but Stuart is terribly upset to realize how irrational and incomplete Peggy’s plans are. When she suddenly makes all pertinent decisions in the space of a half-hour, Stuart tells Jack this doesn’t indicate certainty, but rather proves his point—she’s just trying to convince herself that the rape didn’t affect hers and it did. A chance remark by Stuart shocks Laurie into realizing he knows she’s not his natural daughter. When she hysterically screams out her alienation and her innate feeling that she was always 'different' he assures her with tears in his eyes that since they really love each other sincerely, it makes no difference; she’ll always be his daughter. Stuart explains that Jen still doesn’t know he has learned the truth, and he would like it to continue that way. In helping Brad pay his bills, Laurie finds Maestro Fausch’s letter and tells Brad that Leslie is pregnant. Ironically, to get to him with this news, she had to get |away from Leslie, and used a meeting with Lance as an excuse. When ‘Lance arrives soon after, he’s angry that Laurie lied, and she later has to explain that she has been helping Brad. Understanding her motives, — Lance agrees that she should continue to press him to |reconcile with Leslie. Brad, however, still won’t reconsider—in fact, the news makes him even more resolute. But Vanessa has had Laurie followed, and hits Leslie with a double blow. She gives her the report saying this proves her sister is involved with her husband, and then assures Leslie that Lance loves her, — not Laurie. Badly confused and hurt, Leslie lashes out by kissing Lance while he sits with her at the piano. Leslie then waits at the apartment for Laurie, and when she arrives, she bitterly accuses her of having an affair with Brad. Laurie angrily assures Leslie she  was with Brad with Lance’s full knowledge and that Leslie’s anger means she still loves Brad. She then explains to Leslie that Brad left her because he’s blind. In shock, Leslie rushes home to confront Brad, furiously berating him for treating her like a child who cannot decide for herself. But Brad, even with Leslie now aware of the situation, refuses to reconcile with her. When Leslie tells Laurie how unreasonable Brad has been, Laurie suggests that Leslie stop seeing everything from her own angle only. 
    • In regards to the Reva vs Erica discussions... I think there was one main difference between the two characters.... Erica never took over/ate up airtime on All My Children.  While she was a larger than life character, she never took over the show and there were times she was even supporting and not the lead.... while Reva basically suffocated Guiding Light in the later years with her presence.
    • That was such a missed opportunity, especially with May sweeps.  And, it would’ve been a much better story for Naomi/Jacob than whatever’s going on with June 
    • https://www.hulu.com/hub/tv/collections/9979 Amazed! But loving it. What this shows is GH Hulu out of top 15, GH is #2 & this was Saturday. Are we happy campers? Yes, at least for the moment, you bet we are.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy