Jump to content

December 21-25, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

It's not like AMC had not had awful deaths before (just a year before that, Julia was gunned down so Tad could have a child he barely spends time with), but Pratt went on and on with this, and often it was so pointless, like "Di" being killed. And as others have said, Stuart.

I know some have said they thought his version of AMC was entertaining, so this may have been why the ratings were good. I don't know. I just want AMC to have a decent headwriter and manage to be a decent show, if Frons can let that happen. If it happens, then I would hate to see a ratings drop, because that sends out the message that wholesale slaughter and making stories up as you go along is the way to get ratings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Yup, the demos are real close. It not a big difference. That's what I was kind of trying to say to Toups....

The networks dont care about the male viewers at all. I guess they think male viewers dont shop for groceries or change brand names...its only 18-49 women demo...my mom is not even in that demo and hell she changes/tries different brand items all the time. A lot of women my mom's age do....the 18-49 is pure hogwash!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Look at the coveted 18-49 demo compared to last year. The 3 soaps that significantly droppedin viewers in this demo are the 3 ABC soaps. They may be holding on to their positions but will not stay long if they continue to bleed out viewers, especially in this demographic.

ABC daytime either needs to fire Brian Frons or admit their plan is to cancel soaps and replace them with talk or game shows. Something has to change quickly IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I watched today just to see Haley and Mateo plus Opal...the rest of the show still sucks. Greenlee...why bring her back??ugh.....Erica and Ryan are [!@#$%^&*] laughable together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am just glad ATWT hasn't gone further down cause of the cancellation news. Other soaps have dropped once cancellation news came out. GL suffered once the cancellation news came out but rebounded their last week on air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just don't get the OLTL love. I know I'm probably in the minority on this, but I find the show just horrible. The dialogue is atrocious. The stories range from the ridiculous (the Mitch crap) to the cliched (EVERY element of the Kish story). I'm a gay man and I've tried to feel the Kish stuff, but it just seems so forced, as if they recycled "Queer as Folk" plotlines. Is the gay subject matter turning people away? Who knows? OLTL can milk all the press they want for Kish, but it's not getting the viewers. The parade of newbies certainly doesn't help things either. Also, with GH down, I wonder if that's affecting OLTL's numbers. OLTL has always been ABC's bridge show between AMC and GH. Maybe the fact that people are tuning out of GH is trickling down to OLTL, with the mindset that "oh I'm not going to watch GH, so why bother keeping the TV on that channel from 2-3 (or whenever OLTL airs)." AMC is also beyond terrible,but with some light at the end of the tunnel with Pratt gone. The whole ABC lineup needs a massive overhaul if it wants to survive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You know it's tiresome hearing how ABC only cares about the demos and nothing else. I've heard the actors spew this crap and it's nonsense. i know in terms of advertising revenue that's what matters but no one can tell me they don't care about total viewers. As you said, you can't keep bleeding viewers and expect there is no impact at all to your demos. That's utter crap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's possible the Kish story could be a turn off to some viewers. Who knows. Otalia didn't do a darn thing for GL's ratings. I thought Nuke did help ATWT a tad for a time simply because they were the first gay couple on soaps and the show got a lot of attention for that, but I could be wrong who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • They've talked about having staff at the Dupree house, like Rowena the chef. I just don't think we've seen them.  
    • Really an excellent point. I'm worried about Derek but he's not working. The Duprees being too good somehow ... well, if they say it instead of be it, okay yes, I would worry but as long as they keep on being good, geeze, that's something to celebrate, not worry!!!  Party on?!
    • I blame Mitch.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree. For now. I am sure in a year's time...a new family (or old) will start to appear on the show. 
    • There's some irony in Philip being forgiven, because it forces everyone to admit that Victor was wrong to change his will.  Everyone, eventually including Xander, (I presume), seems to think it was wrong for Victor to divide his estate in Xander's favor.  I appreciated Stephanie forgiving Philip, because she's got no skin in that game.  But, Belle's line about Philip missing Xander because he misses Bo did not ring true.  I think Philip would be sad if Bo dies, but I think he's more concerned currently about Xander. I am enjoying this EJ mystery so much that I am hereby taking a vow not to read spoilers.  I am also vowing — for the last time — to stop harping on this, but: the concept of a “sepsis treatment” remains absurd. Hospitals prevent sepsis through vigilant infection control; once sepsis sets in, it causes multiple organ failures. Treatment involves supporting each failing organ individually. The notion that a single medication could magically reverse organ failure is medically laughable. However, I like the contrast of Kim going through cancer, which is incurable in their universe.  Kayla's comment on the health of both of her siblings was both heartbreaking and an interesting twist.  MBE is also totally underrated.  She is carrying the weight of so many stories.   And, I like the use of Kayla as an audience surrogate.  She's arguably the most "real" person in Salem. Kayla isn't psychic, she wasn't SORASed, she's not a billionaire, and she doesn't have a bionic eye.  So, I enjoy that we get her perspective of the nuttiness that surrounds her. However, I don't get what gives her the authority to turn down EJ's offer.  I understand that they need a hospital figurehead to show us scenes of the competition to buy the hospital.  But, unless the entire administration has been let go, the Chief of Staff wouldn't make those choices.
    • But why worry about something that might not happen? Right now, most things revolve around the Duprees. We have no idea if or how long that will continue. For now, it's working.
    • The Duprees not having any staff is a bugbear for me. They've included the background staff at the Country Club but no one at the Dupree home. Even just an extra bringing in a tray of food/drinks or responding to a request from Anita would suffice.
    • Shut up, Dante and Lois.  I actually don't mind this particular soap trope, but in the context of this storyline, it just feels forced and unnecessary. If anything, this Dante/Gio tension needed to begin months ago. Plus, this storyline, in general, isn't doing Lois any favors either.  Emma comforting Gio was really sweet though. It's definitely time for the two of them to have their first kiss. And, Joss playing Secret Agent Barbie will just never work.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy