Jump to content

November 16-20, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

GH is a horribly written testosterone driven show

that degrades and belittles women its horrid

it is abundantly clear that the writers are clueless about good soap

GuZa has got to go end of story... He should have been gone "years ago."

It is Brian Frons that dictates story on all three of his shows

He approves everything which I've been told they all do but he changes what the writers write...

until he hires excellent "soap" writers not his buddies

let them do their job and stay out of it (he's re-defining the genre he says)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

But you would think that the 18 to 49 viewers already watching GH would have stuck around. It is hard to believe that 136,000 of them stopped watch live to go watching JF on YT. I checked the views of JF on GH, YT videos and none were had more had a 2000 views. It could be a random weekly fluctuation that has no relationship to what was on the screen. It was also the week before the holiday week so people could have been getting an early start travelling home to be with their families. This seems far more likely since GH's stunt promotion usually draws in viewers for the occasional demo bump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Holiday week? Explain how Days managed to capture those viewers yet GH didn't. If you're going to use the holiday excuse that should apply to all soaps. Days just had a huge week and it appears viewers prefer classic soap telling versus stunt casting. And sorry I don't think James Franco is a big draw. He's not an A list star. He's not Tom Cruise or WIll Smith. Days ran promos in primetime as GH did it just seems most prefer classic versus a stunt with an a C list star that I'll bet many TV viewers don't even know.

Add in the fact that JJ's return IMO has been horribly handled and this is the result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Coming from the perspective of someone newer to GH, here's my main problem with the show (not saying this is the main problem, just mine): there is no follow through with any storyline. I started watching right before the Carnival event. When all of the mayhem broke out at the carnival, people were injured, killed, etc., I expected some sort of fallout. I expected to see Edward Quartermaine and his family deal with the consequences of the accident and to see how others dealt with it. But in just a few days, poof, it was over, Edward disappeared from the screen and then back to square one.

Claudia's death. Same thing once again. Michael killed Claudia, but I am not seeing any fallout from this. There's no sense of something happening that will have far-reaching effects on everyone involved. I thought Carly's reaction from a mother's perspective from her boy killing someone sorely lacked writing wise -- which surprised me, not in a good way. And Michael's reaction hasn't been written well.

The Dante story -- again, great potential. Pretty simple story that should be easy to tell -- a son out to destroy a man who happens to be his father, and he doesn't know it. This should be a big story with loads of emotional impact. But again, they aren't even following through well on this one and the emotional impact isn't there. I do love the actor playing Dante though. He probably won't stay on the show more than a couple years.

The Spixie wedding -- even though Spinelli gets on my nerves, I thought the wedding was well written and heartfelt. But Maxie is cheating already? LOL. It made that whole exercise kind of pointless.

And I hate to say this because he has loads of fans, but Jason bores me. I've tried really hard to get into his character, but there's nothing there for me to latch onto. He seems to be devoid of emotion.

From what I've read from longtime viewers, the head writer hasn't just alienated them. He has turned them off forever. It seems that a lot of things people loved for years about GH have been destroyed. It's hard to win people back after that kind of deliberate destruction. A few events won't fix that problem.

I am still watching the show though. But I'm not the viewer they need to win back and keep. JMHO.

BTW, James Franco is co-starring in an upcoming movie with Julia Roberts. He co-starred in a film with Sean Pean. While he hasn't reached A-list status and isn't well-known outside of the younger set, he is definitely up and coming with a bright future in spite of his stint on GH. He's not C-list by any means.

ETA: Thank you Toups, for the ratings!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Its not that Franco isnt an A list star, because he is IMHO... its that he isnt a brad & angie, a britney, hes not someone who makes people want to see something. I dont even think Tom Cruise could pull it off.

Also, as you said, hes really not knowen to TV viewers. If you follow hollywood and award season and whatnot you know him. But Franco almost never even makes tabloid magazines. He just doesnt have that star power. But hes in no way a C list actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would argue that Days is an anomaly, an outlier. It is the only soap that has consistently gained viewers since last year. Consequently, Days had the strength to withstand the pre-holiday week slump and gain viewers with the climax of the baby switch story while the other soaps stumbled. I don't really know, but GH which is crap usually does well with heavy promotion so other factors could be at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So the factor is maybe again Franco is not a draw. The stuff that does well for GH have been big events which I argue brings back lapsed viewers to watch the current cast in a big cast event. What lapsed viewers is Franco bringing in. It's not a big event he's involved in it's a storyline with Jason. And I still don't think he's a draw. He's not a A lister and I'd argue that a lot of people watching TV don't know him. It's not like he's Tom Cruise. I'd argue that if it was TOm Cruise or WIll Smith or Julia Roberts, those numbers for that week would have been decent.THe fact that the whole week for GH slumped tells me it's just not Franco at play it's other things also. IA Days had the baby storyline but doesn't it say something when viewers tuned in for that yet not GH's stunt casting. Even the carnival GH promoted only drew in decent numbers a couple of days. Claudia's death lasted a couple of days, etc..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think if you read my comments I said he's an A list actor, C list star. No he doesn't make the tabloids.etc.. He's just doesn't have that star power yet but gosh he's still young, 31. I just don't think people are going to tune into a bad soap to watch him. Even Liz Taylor back when she made her appearence on GH, while not actively performing in films, still had star power then.

And KSlater outlined the exact problem with GH. They don't run the course with stories and so many get dropped. It's why so many of the deaths on GH have been such a waste. First they kill off valuable legacy characters with loads of story potential. But they do nothing with them. Alan Q died after the 2007 MC Crisis Storyline and there was a storyline started where his will was forged and it was dropped and nothing. Georgie and Emily 2 young legacy females were killed on screen in a murder mystery the audience was supposed to follow and it all but disappeared until they decided months later to bring a character back from the dead as a culprit. Claudias death was IMO disgusting but after 2 years of this you'd think the fallot and followup story would be more. Nada. JJ comes back to play Lucky in the midst of a horrid storyline that had no buildup and is now waning because they are dragging it out and nothing. All of these stories could have had emotional punch for the long haul and played out yet nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe that quality of a soap is reflected in the ratings unless there is a consistent trend upwards like Days has had or promotion of a stunt like GH does. I am just surprised that GH's heavy promotion along with James Franco did not work this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What stunt did GH promote though? I guess stunt casting but there was no story promoted. Every other promotion GH has done to draw in viewers has been an all cast event stunt, the MC Crisis, the trainwreck, the hotel fire. I just don't think Franco is a big TV draw.Plus I'll bet people may have tuned in before he appeared to see the lead up to his appearence and perhaps found the show lackluster as it is. He may be an a list actor, but he doesn't yet have the starpower that a Cruise, Clooney, Smith, Roberts, Pitt, do. I'd argue the same thing about a DeNiro. I don't think in his heydey he would be a huge draw but Redford would have. ONe was a well known fabulous A list actor the other a superstar and a B list actor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

In my opinion.

What will bring in viewers / demise of soaps most of the blame is theirs IMO eg

most of ABC soaps write lousy stories....I came back to AMC for Jesse/Angie return and overall am not pleased with their storylines...

African Americans were huge soap watchers its nearing 2010 "soaps are not diverse" that is one of their "major" problems only Caucasians driving top tier A story by lead actors...they have "lost the African American audience" IMO and I really don't think we're watching like we use to....

Most of my Spanish friends are into tella novellas

Soaps IMO (for the most part with a few exceptions) do not represent the world we live in today they are dated I still watch but not like I use to.

When African Americans walk from a show IMO they don't come back they are done with Soap operas we waited around for decades with little change that I see... its too much good programming out here to waste time. I use to watch all soaps now I'm done to two and a half..

I use to avidly watch ATWT I lost intrest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you may be right Q. I had just started tuning into Days for the first time ever when he implied that it would be canceled,s o I stopped watching and never went back. I figured why get into a show a year or so before it's ended. Guess I should have stuck it out, but that statement seemed pretty concrete at the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest dc cubs

Nielsen to Have "Internet Meters" In Place Prior to 2010-2011 Season

The integrated measurement of advertising across both TV and internet viewing might happen sooner than we thought. Nielsen now expects to have a portion of its people meter households covered with “Internet meters” prior to the 2010-2011 broadcast season.

Once that happens, count on internet viewing on Hulu.com and the network’s websites having the same national advertising load as the telecasts for at least 3 days after airtime, so it will count in the C+3 commercial ratings that the networks sell to advertisers.

Urged by clients to move faster, Nielsen responded Tuesday (Dec. 1) with a plan to accelerate the rollout of the Internet meter to its national people meter sample. The plans call for Nielsen to complete the roll out by Aug. 31, 2010, instead of some time in 2011.

The initiative, now called TVandPC will create the industry’s first single source measure of viewing to both TV and online. Once the rollout is complete, Nielsen will be able to report online video viewing from 7,500 national-people-meter homes, representing about 20,000 people and 12,000 computers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Quoting another a cyber bud here but basically these are the same storylines that didn't play out for me as well. And she says it all ....

"their lack of follow through.

They had 4 or 5 stories in a row that got dropped without any conclusion, any sparks, no pay off that I was uber excited about and that were responsible for me tuning in every day.

"

1. Elizabeth/Jason/Jake/Paternity Secret/Secret lovers (huge anvil of Jake's pic dropping on safe house floor)

2. Jason taking over as mob boss/the decline of Sonny/Jason's friendship and the ramifications on the mob business

3. Jason as mob boss going head to head with Anthony Z.

4. The Text Message Killer

5. The ramifications of Emily's death on Jason and Elizabeth/Jake and the Quartermaines "

5. Monica's alcholism storyline given the bum's rush...

(and where she stayed mad at Jason 2 eppys re: him being responsible for the deaths of her other two children

then was scribed back into kissing his ass)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy