Jump to content

Y&R: Week of November 23 Discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Well, this rebroadcast of the wedding episode made me miss the Y&R of the old and made me realize just how much worse the show is in its current state. Let me start off by saying I thought the show was getting into a horrible state in late 2005, but looking back, it isn't anywhere near as bad as the show is now under Maria Arena Bell, Hogan Sheffer, and Scott Hamner and was under Latham (post Smith and Alden).

I miss the production elements Y&R used to have, even the stogy dialogue, and the utter class Y&R used to represent to me. I didn't enjoy Sheila's 2005 return, and if this was any hint about her possibly coming back, then this writing team really lacks originality and a planned creative strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 169
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Bring these people back in a last ditched effort to save Y&R. :(

I'm not saying they would be the answer to all the show's problems, but these were people who poured almost their entire professional lives into Y&R, and they were dismissed and never brought back. Instead the writing team now is filled with a garden variety of recycled hacks who do it all for a paycheck. They do not "get" Y&R and the style the show used to exude.

If daytime is ending anyway, it's time to go back to the group of people who brought in more consistent ratings and critical acclaim, not the ones who are doing the opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I know they have their problems, but it makes me sick how accepting and forgiving Lauren always is with Gloria, and how dimissive she'll always be with Joanna.

Joanna needs to make regular visits to put Gloria and her criminal family in their place. I liked her sparring with Gloria the last time she was in town and how she makes everyone around her go nuts.

Susan Seaforth Hayes hasn't been on DAYS this month (or has she?), surely Y&R could have written her into their Thanksgiving episode as a random visit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It sure made me miss the Colonnade Room. We last supposedly saw it during the Sudden Impact gala for PSArts...but that didn't look like the Colonnade.

Thank you.

I'm not necessarily objecting, except...they didn't provide consistent ratings...AT ALL. Steady linear decline since the mid-90s...some of them (Alden solo) at a rate faster than some of MAB's losses! You know I have the graphs to prove it :lol:.

She's given the most loving interviews about Bill Bell, and her mom's last stint as Charlotte...I think at WLS.

In that, she said that she and Bill will be in the Xmas episodes at DOOL. One hope--if Lauren is going to get more story (for any reason)--is that maybe Joanna might come back. (Who am I kidding? Doris Collins didn't even spend Turkey Day with Sharon, and Mary Williams is just gone and forgotten.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They never lost almost a million viewers in a single year, like Maria Arena Bell did and is still trying to make up for. No matter what you said about Sudden Impact, Y&R has never fully recovered over the long-haul from those massive losses in 2008.

Y&R might also be up a bit year to year over the past few weeks, but the show still lost viewers and in demos over the 2008-2009 season.

Their declines were on par with the rest of daytime, unlike most of MAB's declines.

This regime hasn't had a consistent trend, nor is the show as creatively stable as it was when the "old regime" was there.

It's time to bring Y&R back to its roots with people who devoted most of their lives into making the show the success it was.

You seem to be very protective of this current writing regime, even as you admit to the damage and bad storytelling they've done. Whose job on that writing staff are you protecting? I never saw you speaking out in defense or making excuses when Latham was getting rid of people who spent almost 30 years on Y&R and in many cases devoted their entire lives to the show.

The Hayes's are very close with the Bell's. I remember when Susan came back for Michael and Lauren's wedding in 2005, Lee Philip Bell and Bill Hayes were both on set that day to cheer her on. She said she obviously doesn't have the stature at Y&R that she has at DAYS, but it's always lovely to work with the Bell's and do Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Remember this exchange between Joanna and Gloria in 2006? It's from the beginning of the crappy Latham era (post Smith and Alden), but I loved how Joanna puts Gloria in her place.

Gloria: You know what Joanna, I've got a great eye and if I can't that it's not the real thing...

Joanna: Well, the widow of John Abbott is not buying the real thing...

:lol::lol::lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4gAz2eyp1U

Seriously, I'd rather have Joanna than Gloria on this show...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You're really going to make me chart this out, aren't you? TO BE CLEAR, I never had real problems with Alden & Smith (and I'll say more about that below), but we can't defend them on a RATINGS basis. Their losses, annually, we no better than MAB's. I'll try to prove that tomorrow, but for now, you've got to believe me :).

I agree here. I totally agree on the issue of creative stability. You are 100% correct.

LOL. I wasn't here on SON during the Latham era...at least not till the tail end.

Creatively, I am in total agreement with you about the current regime. I don't think firing 'em all is necessarily the answer. I'd happily get a Jim Houghton back in exchange for, say, a Scott Hamner. So, we're on the same wavelength.

But I think you're on stronger ground when you make your argument from a creative stance than from a ratings stance.

For the record (not on SON), my affection for Latham disappeared almost instantly after Smith, then Alden, the Scott (and the others in that era) left. It became very clear what Latham was doing, and that her hiring philosophy was the opposite of Bell's (promote from within; retain members of your team). So I am in total agreement.

What I have heard, though, is that some of those legacy folks don't even WANT to come back...they consider themselves badly burned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Money always talks, and I'm sure all the years of professional devotion they poured into this show doesn't go away just like that.

If Billy and Maria called, say a Jack Smith or a Trent Jones, I'm sure something can be worked out.

Once you get the top management secured, then all of the old staff writers who worked for the leads of the team before can feel more comfortable about coming back.

If someone from the old regime came back to take over the show, then firing them all and replacing the current team with friends and people they worked with before is sure to happen, and I'm not against it. Y&R needs people who know the show and its style, not people who think they know or people that worked for all the other soaps and are just doing this for a paycheck.

As it stands, all three of Y&R's Head Writers have had disastrous creative track records. Why should Y&R keep these people? Getting the old team back would be a step in the right direction.

LOOK how small the writing staff used to be with the credits you posted, and that was in 2005! No way in hell can anyone tell me that this current writing team is any better or more cohesive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MarkH, why would you only fire Scott Hamner? It seems to me that Hogan Sheffer is the biggest failure. He actually provided us with lots of entertainment but is a poor fit for Y&R and a bad writer overall. Maria Arena Bell's solo stint was terrible and showed no potential. Hogan saved her. Why are people so in love with her? What did she do in those months that makes her a great writer? The show was stabilized somewhat, but Sabrina was very damaging to the show and it was extremely dull and so many characters were on the backburner. I look at this three as one big headwriter with one vision and all three need to go. We kept Scott Hamner and look how that worked out. Why do these people deserve so many chances? What have they done to earn this?

It's like if AMC said, "Oh no Chuck we won't fire you, but Lorraine Broderick can be your second in command." You still have crappy Pratt around! I get goosebumps thinking of the horrors if ATWT dumped Passanante and replaced her with Leah Laiman, her CO-HW. I think when a show gets this bad they just need to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, and the show started sucking even back then. I tuned in to watch Shelia and realized which episode it was in like 5 min of watching it. It didn't take long for me to switch the channel to the View.

Seeing Lauren not recognize Shelia still looked stupid even after 4 years. The old regime was running out of stories to tell that didn't insult the audience. LML was EP but the same writers were writing this [!@#$%^&*]...lol.

The only one who knew Y&R was the late great William J Bell.

Btw...Phyliss and Nick were a couple at the time...ugh...another reason not to watch...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Love most of your post..MAB is not doing well and I am sure people above her are not happy because they DO NOT HAVE THE SAME AGENDA!! :lol::lol: The thing for me is I know she can write better but she is writing for the wrong characters and shoddily too.

Darn, I miss the Colonnade Room..but I can live without it. Until this show starts picking up and making some more money for the networks & Sony, flashy weddings will be a thing of the past. I don't miss the flashy weddings - tells me nothing about love. My Prince Charles & Princess Diana had one, look at how that ended up. They are only "pretty" and really don't mean anything especially if the marriage sucks LOL. Thanks heavens so far Michaael & Lauren has been an exception to the rule. I really loved that eppy and it was picked and shown for a reason. Let the games begin!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • This better be something, because as I said, so far it's just cliches and stereotypes -- the story we've heard a thousand times about the homeless person who doesn't want a home and prefers to live on the streets.
    • @rsclassicfanforever thank you very much for the recent uploads of season 13 containing some episodes that were skipped or glitchy on YouTube!  I had a look at 3172 though and there is no audio for most of it? Would you have a copy with complete audio? Fingers crossed! Thanks again! 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I like Margaret well enough in what I've seen of her as Paige - she is green but she has real star power.  I agree about the actor who plays Brian. He's...mostly just there. Not bad but not great.  My main issue is with the guy who plays Owen. He's just not appealing to me. I can believe Nola being obsessed with him, but he's draining to watch.  I'm surprised people objected to the quasi-incest elements as it wasn't anything that new for soaps.  Speaking of Kim, here's a rare episode of an anthology show she did called The Evil Touch.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    •   I get what you're both saying, and I think the show was lucky to have even made it that long, but I think they could have still maintained a certain audience - Second Chances did before the earthquake. CBS was an older network anyway. I think the premise of Knots was still usable, it was more the characters who were a problem - many of the older figures were played out. If the show had done a better job building up its younger cast instead of making so many poor choices in the late '80s and early '90s, they could have kept things going a little longer. 
    • I wish I cared about the homeless lady as much as everyone else seems to. After the nothing burger that was the lawsuit, this just feels like another boring Naomi storyline at Orphy Genes since she has no office.
    • That's great to hear. Thanks. I wish that was more readily available.
    • Just learned that Clifton Davis wrote this song!  I had no idea.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I think even if Marland had wanted to write more for Sara/Adam, his hands would have been tied as Robert Milli was one of the actors dumped by P&G due to his age.  From the bits and pieces I've seen of that period, Sara does have a key role in the Carrie plot, and Marland briefly gave her son Tim a more important part. I'm not sure if they just gave up on Tim once Kevin Bacon left or if they never really cared. I did not even know for many years that there was an actor in the part after Kevin...and then not one, but two. The Spauldingfield video on Tim doesn't even show the last actor (Nigel Reed), which kind of says it all. Anyway, I do get the sense Marland has some use for Sara, or for Millette. It's only after he goes that she is dumped. Of course he didn't ever hire her for his other shows, so maybe I'm wrong. (then again he never hired Geraldine Court either and he seemed very fond of her) Ann is an odd character to me as she is a proto-Lillian in being defined by pining for a Bauer brother and being involved in the death of one of their wives. I do wonder what else they could have done with her. She was friends with Diane, wasn't she? They could have had Diane manipulate her against Mike, I suppose.
    • Yassss....come on Maurice and Brandon...give us nothing!!! Wow, their need to develop their craft shone like a blinding light this episode. Brandon in his Martin and Smitty scenes sounded like he was reading and the facial expressions were giving Disney Channel. He did much better against Maurice in the Martin v Ted scenes. Now, Teddd-dyy (Dana's voice) was just flat. I watched the episode just now after reading the comment on here that Maurice needs to stop swaying, and now I can't unsee it. Has it really been this bad all along?  Ambyr carries. I don't need to say anymore. I am kind of excited to see this Kat/Tomas/Eva stuff play out.  Bill is such a dick to Dani. Like that's the mother of your children that you cheated on with your daughter's best friend but you look to take those low blows. Lord! When he said that thing about it being obvious he didn't care about Dani anymore since he was the one that walked out...that was cold. I even felt for Dani. Bill definitely is all over the spectrum. You can see a villain possibly surfacing, but you also see this great father. The elder Duprees move a little funny. I'm wondering what that is all about. Are they just overly protective matriarch and patriarch because they think it's what's best for their family, or are they afraid their secrets will come out or there's something more sinister there. Why would Vernon want to keep that information from Martin?  I hope something interesting comes out of this June stuff, but as of right now, I'm not too invested. It's not helping my interest on Naomi or Jacob either. However, tge actress playing Naomi has comes a long way from day one.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy