Jump to content

Lorraine Broderick as AMC head writer


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 722
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Good question. I don't know. I think the role is recastable though. I love James Mitchell but if Edward Quartermaine can be recast then Palmer Cortlandt can be recast.

I can't really think of a name actor in that age group who would be a good fit. Anyone have any ideas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would bring back Ross Chandler, as he has ties to both of those families and could help serve as a mentor figure and a foil for other business characters they may want to bring in. And he does not have the heavy ties to the Martins that end up damaging a lot of otherwise interesting tycoon/antihero/villains in the last decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sorry Eric. I would've had the same reaction a few years ago, but I think enough time has passed where it would be ok to recast Palmer. The show needs to reestablish some of these core families and the Cortlands need Palmer.

I would actually love for the show to bring in a new generation of Tylers, but the chances are pretty much zero that that will ever happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I would love to have Ross back to fight Adam for his company instead of JR and/or Scott.

Julie would be a good idea, too, since she connects the Chandlers to the Kanes.

I disagree about Palmer. If James Mitchell can't come back or is retiring, then I think the show should kill Palmer off and and have Ross return to try to take over his assets. Imo, Ross has the potential to be an intriguing multilayered villain with connections to most of the other characters.

ICAM that there is zero chance of the Tylers returning, but I'd love for Chuck & Donna's offspring to start arriving in Pine Valley. They must have had an offscreen litter after all these years!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the show made a big mistake in killing off Chuck and Donna's son Johnnny, since he could've been the future of the Tylers. I always wondered why Agnes wrote off all the original Tylers, save Phoebe, and morphed them into the Wallingfords, which were pretty much comic relief. She killed off Ann and her daughter with Paul, and never gave Kelly and Linc kids of their own. Has Agnes ever given an explanation for doing away with the Tylers? I wonder too that if Michael E. Knight hadn't clicked so incredibly as Tad from the get-go, the Martins would've lasted this long? Don't forget, by the time he joined the show, Tara and Jeff had long been written out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the Martins would have lasted, Joey would have eventually been aged, and Ruth was still an important part of the canvas during the '80s.

That's a good point about the Tylers. Was the Ann recast not popular with viewers? And Linc had been recast multiple times, hadn't he? Then Chuck was also written out.

I hope Lorraine, if she has the power and the ability, can bring back some old families, because I think the current Martins and the current Chandlers are not going to cut it. If David Canary is only going to be on the show until sometime next year, then the thought of the Chandlers left with just JR and with Scott...it's not going to be easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy