Jump to content

AMC: Possible returns for 40th Anniversary


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I get the feeling that all this is going to be is Hayley showing interview clips she did with each character. That's how it all has to do with her show. I don't think that the characters will be interacting with each other or with the rest of the cast.

Eden tweeted that she would only be on for "a hot second". Which makes sense: the show is only 30-something minutes long and there are 8 people to get to.

ETA: In support of this theory, SOD Online says that Eden will be taping her appearance in LA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read that Eden said she'd be on for "hot minute" something like that. Makes me think it might have more to do with whatever it is for Hayley's talk show stuff. Maybe it's just Bianca on tape for a minute

LOL I think Pratt's head would explode. It would rock if she said "Well I see you LOVE to copy my work and call it your own" :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was hoping that it would be some kind of tribute to Ray MacDonnell, who's retiring, but it doesn't sound that way. I'm beyond thrilled that Julia Barr is back. Knowing that she hasn't totally broken ties with the show and that her bitterness has probably subsided can keep me dreaming that maybe she's consent to do a long-term return at some point. I doubt that Frons would allow it, but a boy can dream. I've watched the show for over 30 years, and I have to say that her dismissal after shamefully being asked to go recurring (it was for all intents and purposes, a firing) was one of the biggest slaps to the fans. I met her once outside the old studio on 66th St back in the mid-80s. I saw her exiting the studio as I was walking home from the subway. I was used to seeing the actors on the street, but I never wanted to be one of "those fans." This time I decided to say hello. I complimented her on her acting. She was just so genuinely friendly, down to earth, and not at all pretentious, which also shone through in her performances. The same can't be said for some of the other actors on the show that I've met, but that's a whole different thread LOL. Really happy that she's back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Wow she only left three years ago? It feels longer :( Seriously as a fan that was the ONE thing, writing her off without even a goodbye MENTION, that really did almsot make me turn off the show (and that's saying a LOT). It'll be awesome to see her again

It would be cool but I guess impossible in the current soapbudget if they could do what they did for the 25th--when they just PACKED Joe and Ruth's new house with past characters--some barely even got ONE line and I admit at the time I didn'tknow who half of them were but...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Members

Interview with La Lucci about the move and 40th Anniversary episodes. She talks about the "format" of the 40th Anniversary episodes. I'm scared. I think it confirms what some were saying here that it basically revolves around Hayley's talk show. It could be really good, or really bad.

http://michaelfairmansoaps.com/2009/interviews/hollywood-christmas-parade-interviews/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks for the interview:

"MICHAEL:

Ryan, Greenlee and Erica will possibly have a triangle in the New Year. Are you looking forward to that story?

SUSAN:

I have no doubts about that. The Ryan/Erica thing is very new and we have had some fun stuff to play just before Thanksgiving"

I guess I missed that "fun stuff"... :S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lucky for me I haven't seen one scene of them. However, I do love the rest of Susan's quote which gives me hope and I may be back watching after all. We'll see.

SUSAN:

I have no doubts about that. The Ryan/Erica thing is very new and we have had some fun stuff to play just before Thanksgiving" and certainly Greenlee coming back into the picture will complicate things. I think it might also mean that Jackson may be back, so we can have a lot of complications all the way around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm assuming JM will tape an isolated piece on the west coast like Eden did, so he probably won't be interacting with anyone (unless Taylor Miller is on the west coast and hasn't taped her bit yet?). I really don't think any of the returnees, except Hayley & Mateo, are going to be interacting with anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The storyline April and Draper are involved in during the summer/autumn of 1979 seems fairly "benign" but soon turns very serious.  April has a VERY intrusive, wealthy mother (Margo Huntington Dorn).  Margo knows that April and Draper (who've recently had a miscarriage and are theoretically never going to be able to conceive another baby) want to buy a house.  Margo hoodwinks them into buying a house they can't afford.  The house is listed at $100,000 (about $400,000 in today's dollars).  Margo pays the first $35,000 and leads Draper to believe the asking price of the house is $65,000 instead of $100,000.  If Draper finds out his meddling mother-in-law paid 1/3 of the cost of the home and tricked him, he'll be mad as hell.   Meanwhile, Draper has received a job offer from a prestigious New York law firm.  Margo pulls some strings and has the senior partner in the firm rescind the offer, to keep April in Monticello.  If Draper finds out about THAT, he'll be even angrier with Margo than he will be about the house trickery.  All of that is "bubbling under the surface" in the fall of 1979 but will be the next major story, as everything begins to spiral out of control.  
    • It felt weird and out of place.  I get. While I agree with those on here that he's gotten better, it's still really bad. I'm not seeing the "good" acting some see...but I'll give him a B for being better than when he first started. There's potential. I'll leave it at that. 
    • It's like watching paint dry at a slow-ass pace. It's bad acting. Entirely. Excellent? With Claybon? Never. Ever. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Ah! Good to hear. Isn't it especially odd to think that house fictionally exists not far from the Karrs?  Or, that it was designed non-fictionally by the same person who designed April's place?
    • Good to know I'm not the only one who noticed that. Strange and awkward, and I don't know what they're doing with those fades.   -- Finally, had to laugh at how many Emmys this board passed out today.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Not unless they live in an apartment complex. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • That was bad. Product placement is fine, but not here, not now. Besides, no one carries their damn detergent to the living room.   Completely and utterly disagree. I thought Brandon Claybon was excellent today -- maybe his best performance since the show started. No recast needed.   Not unpopular with me. That didn't work. The montage was good, but 5 minutes of Amazing Grace? With all those verses? No. What kind of family breaks into a loud version of Amazing Grace after what just happened??? None. Anita's lecture to Leslie was great. Ending the show -- a really good episode with crackling dialogue -- like that was a mistake.  
    • Today, was a fantastic episode. I loved everything about, including Ainta singing, Amazing Grace. I love the family dynamic of the Dupree's so much. They remind me of my own family at times. Martin & Smitty have come leaps and bounds from where they  started. I genuinely felt a connection between them I can't wait to watch it deepen. Dana/Leslie/Sherry/Ana is a piece of work. Her speech at the Dupree's about her "concern" for Eva and then locking her out of their apartment??? She is pure evil, but I love it. I can't wait to see where the Eva/Kat story goes. There's so much potential there. As for Ted, I need to see Keith Robinson in the role before giving my true critique of Maurice Johnson.
    • I don't recall that we ever saw the exterior of the Madison house.  BUT the interior is definitely Mission Revival.  It has a wrought-iron staircase, and all the doorways & corridors have archways.  I watched a few old episodes over the weekend from that period and really noticed for the first time how uniquely Mission Revival the set is.  
    • I know Daphnee's back hurts, because she was carrying Maurice through those scenes! Still not loving the idea of replacing the actor, but he was giving very little.  Brandon's scenes with Leslie did not hit the way they were supposed to because I was busting out laughing.  One thing I enjoy about this soap is how it plays with the nuance of good and evil. Kat vs Eva and Anita vs Leslie. There are some things that Kat and Anita said that makes it hard to root for them and how the Duprees can be family over everything to a fault. It almost makes them come across as entitled and unlikely at times. And while what Lesile and Eva have done is wrong in different ways, you can see that hurt and sympathize.  Now, what I don't get is what Lesile thought she was doing expecting the Duprees to accept Eva with open arms. Honey, Eva is a Richardson not a Dupree. In the Dupree world, she's Ted's problem unless they choose otherwise, because there ain't a drop of Dupree blood coursing throught her veins (unless we learn otherwise in some twist). Ted is lucky if they don't disown his ass.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy