Jump to content

October 19-23, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

LOL..I dont think ATWT could have done that. The promo for ATWT this week was pretty good. I'd love to see ATWT hit 2.0 next week but I have a feeling it will only get a 1.9 for the week. It's going to take more good storytelling for it to hit 2.0.

How do you think the numbers will be with Jonathan Jackson back??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest dc cubs

I was expecting Days to drop some in total number of viewers after a couple of weeks of increases. I'm glad it wasn't a huge drop and they maintained their household rating. The good news is they held their own considering AMC was the only soap this week to increase in number of viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Because you're making it seem like the decline of the 90s to today (cable/Internet) is a continuation of the decline of the 70s/80s (women entering the workforce) by putting them all on the same graph. So then it looks like, soaps are definitely dead because of something that has started in the 70s and is still going on. Look, there is forty years of evidence that there is an inexorable downward trend! We're doomed! It's over!

But no, actually, it is

- one decline in the 70s/80s driven by less people being at home, a decline that has stopped.

- a second decline of the cable/Internet age, which may or may not be ending.

- aging that is a constant throughout in killing off soap viewers.

If the cable/Internet revolution had not happened, soap viewership would probably have leveled out after the 80s even with the aging of viewers (because there would have been new viewers to replace them).

I appreciate your interest in historical ratings, though. Thank you for your posts! I just don't see the value in extracting any trends from forces of the 70s/80s which are long since in the past. I hope I have not been rude in my disagreement, and if so, I apologize.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What would be interesting I think is to compare the relative ratings of the top primetime dramas with the top daytime dramas in tv every five or so years--only a few have noted that the primetime numbers have fallen since the early 90s at a percentage not all that far from the soaps...

I have no idea why AMC is pumping numbers right now and I admit the show is a mess but I can't help but pleased whenever it does better than GH (and while I think OLTL currently deserves to do better, I get a shot of glee whenever I see that poor TVguide Canada's Nelson Branco's AMC boycott and OLTL must watch seems to be making both shows have the opposite fate he wants (of course really it has nothing to do with him)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 3.8/5,059,000 (+124,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.4/3,283,000 (+44,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Monday: 2.4/3,257,000 (+224,000)

4.(4) OLTL: Monday: 2.0/2,823,000 (+302,000)

5.(7) AMC: Monday: 2.0/2,751,000 (+365,000)

6.(5) GH: Monday: 1.9/2,727,000 (+218,000)

7.(6) ATWT: Monday: 1.7/2,298,000 (-102,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Tuesday: 3.7/4,922,000 (-137,000)

2.(2) B&B: Tuesday: 2.5/3,280,000 (-3,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Tuesday: 2.3/3,076,000 (-181,000)

4.(5) AMC: Tuesday: 2.0/2,690,000 (-61,000)

5.(6) GH: Tuesday: 2.0/2,628,000 (-99,000)

6.(4) OLTL: Tuesday: 1.9/2,461,000 (-362,000)

7.(7) ATWT: Tuesday: 1.8/2,459,000 (+161,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.7/4,961,000 (+39,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.2/2,962,000 (-318,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.1/2,897,000 (-179,000)

4.(4) AMC: Wednesday: 2.0/2,598,000 (-92,000)

5.(5) GH: Wednesday: 1.9/2,539,000 (-89,000)

6.(6) OLTL: Wednesday: 1.9/2,385,000 (-76,000)

7.(7) ATWT: Wednesday: 1.7/2,287,000 (-172,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.7/5,169,000 (+208,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.5/3,378,000 (+416,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Thursday: 2.0/2,706,000 (-191,000)

4.(4) AMC: Thursday: 2.0/2,613,000 (+15,000)

5.(5) GH: Thursday: 1.9/2,518,000 (-21,000)

6.(7) ATWT: Thursday: 1.8/2,474,000 (+187,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Thursday: 1.8/2,340,000 (-45,000)

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.6/5,169,000 (SAME)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.3/3,301,000 (-77,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Friday: 2.3/3,073,000 (+367,000)

4.(6) ATWT: Friday: 1.9/2,717,000 (+243,000)

5.(4) AMC: Friday: 2.0/2,699,000 (+86,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Friday: 1.9/2,449,000 (+109,000)

7.(5) GH: Friday: 1.9/2,413,000 (-105,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree with you, soaps still got a lot of time left especially those that are either doing a solid job in the ratings or are owned by the network.

I'm glad you told me not to treat it as a guilty pleasure as I've heard from a lot of viewers today that they are liking what they are seeing on ATWT lately. This upcoming stunt for November Sweeps should help get the ratings up.

Any soap can be saved at this point, its not writing on the wall just yet. DAYS was only an hour away from getting cancelled at one point then it seemed to have gotten this freakish rebirth and it went from a 1.6 to a 2.4 in only a short amount of time.

Anything is possible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The DAYS comeback story is an amazing one. I can't believe this soap reached a 2.4 and a 2.3 in the same week. If I'm not mistaken DAYS is doing better than NBC Late Night except in the demos. DAYS has an amazing opportunity coming up to reach 2nd place but B&B is making it tough on them as they seem to have their weaker days when DAYS has their 2.0 and 2.1 days.

Y&R was stronger than what as I thought it was going to be and that's a good sign as it has a chance to hang between 3.7-4.1 for the whole sweeps stretch.

ATWT had a great Friday, that is the highest I've seen it in a minute. I heard its doing better than Let's Make a Deal so this is a good sign right now but the odds are still against them for renewal next spring at this point. I think CBS should be able to handle 3 soaps better than they did with 4.

The ABC Soaps had a decent week but OLTL is the best of these soaps right now on the Alphabet. If OLTL had some more money put behind it and confidence by the network then this soap could be doing as well as DAYS. GH has gotten so hard to watch lately but there's still some storylines that interest me enough to comeback and watch it. I plan on watching the Claudia getting killed by Sonny stuff coming up for Sweeps. GH is just not a balanced show right now, its a hot mess and I'm surprised ABC let the show hit rock bottom like this when there were plenty of chances to save the soap with the biggest fanbase. I think GH should just go the direction that DAYS went and just rebuild around their young new characters b/c the show's reputation is really bad right now.

Overall, this is a better week than I expected for the soaps and this promising as soaps just started today so the ratings next week should see some big increases. Did I mention that it still pains me not to see GL on the screen anymore. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Days was bound to lose some at some point, its been on a steady gain pattern for far too long without some loss. the good side, as you said, is that they didnt lose by much. it also looks like they went up in shares, yes?

Ehhh, while i will say OLTL is a better soap i find AMC easier to watch... if anyone gets that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly. The number of women entering the workplace has steadily increased. There are more women working outside the home now than ever before. Even in this hard economy, women are more likely to keep their jobs because they get paid less. The soaps' real problem is the socio-demographic shift that has taken away its 18-49 women audience. Nothing can reverse this which is why the soaps will eventually be cancelled for cheaper daytime programming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well said. I love the way some people speak where they make it sound like suddenly around 1970 there was a ten year period where women all entered the workforce and then it stopped and stuck to how it's been in 1980 or so.

Anyway, your postmademe think--if you read soap books in thelate 70s and early 80s there was a lot of talk about how soaps were now not just for women, people like Agnes Nixon would point out in interviews how 30-40% of AMC viewers at that time were male, etc, and several books I have from that time point out that the stigma about men watching soaps was fading and in another decade or so that would probably all be gone and it would be seen truly as a medium for both genders. Yet that never happened. The stigma about a (straight) guy watching a soap still definetly exists and if anything the stigma has now started up stronger with women watching too.

In LaGuardia's book Soap World (from 79or so I thik) there's a whole chapter where he talks about how during rhe 70s soaps came of age, peopel were starting to recognize them for their talent and writing, it was less of a stigma to be a soap actor, etc, and he had proposed scenarios about how soaps would grow in even the next ten years with Barbra Streisand tellign her agent she wanted a lead on a soap, soaps being seen by the leading playwrights as a much mroe satisfying medium for them, male and female (tasteful) nudity being accepted, etc, etc It all reads as beyond silly now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think there's a stigma with soaps now.

The problem isn't a stigma so much as a, "Who cares?" "Is that still on?"

The soaps have made themselves irrelevant by catering almost exclusively to a subsection of viewers and then showcasing crappy stories and bad actors in attempts to cater to that market. Most of whom weren't that interested in vapid teens or twentysomethings with killer abs and deadlier line readings.

If soaps hadn't destroyed so much of what made them special in attempts to get a new audience, they would have more support now. You don't have to have a big audience to be relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Just watched the episode concerning Olivia's drug use and Abby's persistence, etc. Donna Mills did stellar work in this episode, as did Tonya Crowe and Brian Austin Green (Brian).
    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy