Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week October 19


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Touche. :lol: :lol: :lol:

AMEN.

Starr & Langston are a lot of fun when RC let's them be smart.

When they are trying to be sexy while rubbing themselves all over Cole & Markko it's the most uncomfortable thing ever.

I've never been too into Jared/Nat but the past couple of weeks changed that.

Brotherton & Archer are selling it for all they are worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Seriously. It's not much longer until they graduate, so I wish they would just keep the sex scenes and sex talk to a minimum until then. Sadly, I think GH is doing a more realistic version of teen sex right now. By which I mean the insecurity and uncertainty girls feel at that age, not the abuse.

I like the actual storyline more than the couple. It's nice to have a little mystery going on. I think I could have liked the couple, but they were on the back burner for so long. They didn't even get a proper wedding, so I never really got the chance to like them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
I think it's because they are the ones most fans obsess over. Is there a lot of promotion for John and Marty? I agree about the couples. It's unusual for me to like so many couples on a show but OLTL has the most diverse and rootable couples. I am also interested in Tea/Elijah and Ross/Blair has potential.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

ITA, John and Marty are not promoted at all as a couple. They hardly share any screen time together(thankfully). I get this feeling the show is going in a different direction completely, which makes me think that Marty will be the odd one out soon. Does anyone know if there are any plans for Elijah or Ross to stay on? If not, anyone have any idea who they could possibly hook Marty up with?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've seen some support for Gigi/Sky, but the show has taken such effort to make sure Gigi only exists for Rex, I will be surprised if she's ever allowed to have a real relationship with anyone else. I can already imagine the lovely scenes of her in bed with Sky and then she pretends he's the howler monkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had a lot of problems with that story, chiefly how much of it was endless telling, not showing (they had feelings for each other in what, a week?), and the contrivance of having her father be the man who drove his mother to suicide. I also don't buy KA in any romantic settings -- her attempts at chemistry with him were very hard to watch.

I can't imagine a choice between having to be in a story which will probably be mostly about Todd, and a story which is mostly about Rex.

I wish they could have put him with Rachel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, because as ES pointed out she looks about 12. I was very against that story at the time and I have a feeling I wasn't alone. All I'm saying is that after she's an adult I'm ok with them going there, but not before. If they don't that's fine too, but something needs to end Starr and Cole soon, for the sake of my viewing pleasure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have a hard time buying Kristen in any romantic relationship, even after she turns 18. I was the same way with Erin Torpey.

I would like to see Cole and Starr stay together and Starr get stories that do not involve her love life. I think they should put Starr into a job, have her really fight to get ahead, to get noticed, to find a voice besides the traumatized teen/daughter of screwed-up parents. Have her adjusting to the real world, and Cole can be her supportive partner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Ambyr Michelle continues to be *that girl.* She’s just a star, period. Elevates every scene she’s in on the sheer strength of her emotional realism and charisma. Can sell any dialogue. I wish the show veered away from the B&B-style scripting. TMG/Leslie’s tirade stood out, I suppose, but she’s getting a bit mustache-twirly. And I wish DD had more to do in that episode than stand and sob.
    • Well, that was down to CBS being weak and not being willing to just pulling the plug entirely. They didn't want to commit to cancelling the show in case they needed it for their schedule basically; plus they kept showing that they were willing to make cuts if needed to be. 
    • I'm sorry but clearly what I've said is not satisfactory to you. I have now read what you have to say, twice. As it happens, my interest at this point is looking at other mislabeled files to find this other Ruth Buzzi content. I do not see any point to each of us repeating ourselves, so I will leave it here. 
    • It seemed to be your intent. coming into a thread I started and making multiple posts saying my data was wrong. In the next paragraph you say "Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why." That certainly didn't stop you from immediately saying the data was wrong, until I provided additional receipts. Why did you not check the daily episode guide (for instance, this one for the 1980's) I posted for the world to see for exactly this reason...to help confirm airdates: http://daytimeroyaltyonline.com/days-daily-summaries-1980-1989-t15361.html? That is what you should be checking BEFORE you make any posts in the future like this, trying to suggest something from my data is incorrect. You could have also messaged me and asked me why your dates weren't adding up with what the correct data is. I would have fast forwarded through that video you posted, spotted Roman and Hope and immediately have told you that was the 11/1/83 episode.
    • Jason, just let me say that it was not my intent to any way impugn any of your data  or research. I'm very sorry if it came out that way. Obviously the person I got these 4 November episodes from has mislabeled files, multiples, which I was certainly unaware of.  When I am editing it is all about what I see & hear. Later, I find time for greater reflection.  Of course, I was suspicious from the very first instance where what I saw & heard did not agree with what it should have.  I'm very glad to know why.  If you find you are no longer interested in the edit, that is fine. I have no ego in this. I did it only to share it.
    • I feel like Vernon and Anita need to not be hypocrites and try and take the heat off Bill in this case. It's clear that the family used him as a fixer and especially knowing he helped with Martin's situation, they need to either be quiet or support him. BTW...with Vanessa being in the hospital for food poisoning, am I the only one who thought Shanice was gonna say she's pregnant or had an STD? The only reason I say STD is because she hasn't had any memorable sex partners, but I definitely don't believe she just had food poisoning.
    • Yeah, I mean I know that the name still pertains. I just laugh at it not now being called Arizona Dust, but, I admit it simply does not have the same ring to it. Above, that is interesting that Arizona had already come up before the crisis. 
    • Anita vs. Leslie, bring it!
    • Leslie and her family are from Chicago? Anita's background also includes being a former Chi-Town native? Might they connect this and go somewhere with it?
    • Honestly who's to say Leslie even birthed Eva, I mean she's a liar, I wouldn't believe a word she says about Eva being Ted's(or hers)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy