Members bellcurve Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 By the way you spelled that term wrong. Alleged should really be spelled A-L-I-S-O-N and Actress should really be spelled S-W-E-E-N-E-Y. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Cheap21 Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 huh? Do explain Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ann_SS Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 I'm with you. It seems too good to be true that Zach and Kendall will be ending. I can't help thinking that TK will change his mind. AM unemployed will make the move to LA. Until years pass and they are both really gone, I'm taking their departures with a grain of salt. LOL! This is so wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 I think the best we can hope for is a recast in the case of Kendall. They are not going to leave Erica without a daughter on the show, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted October 11, 2009 Author Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 I think we have seen that there is a small circle of Fusion-girls/Erica's-girls that Mr. Frons will not relinquish. Greenlee, Bianca, Kendall. Thus, I fully expect that Kendall, as played by Minshew, will return some day. As for TK, it will be interesting. If he truly is as arrogant as NB implied, he may have handled himself poorly in the recent negotiations to move to LA. If that is true, then I could imagine him staying in NYC but not going on the (soon to be cancelled?) OLTL...except maybe as Marty's exit storyline. (It's aligning this way anyway. Todd is busy with Blair and Tea, and John is busy with Natalie. Marty is sort of a free agent...isn't it time for her dead Thornheart to return to her? Are we sure that Ian wasn't really Patrick in deep cover anyway?). With only ATWT left in NYC (and yes, I imagine Barbara Bloom would be a TK-fan from the Port Charles days), it may be that his next stop is Oakdale. Maybe as a recast of Andy or something (I know the ages are wrong, but does anyone care?). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ann_SS Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 I had not considered a recast of Kendall. They did it before. They may give AM time to change her mind and then recast role. We could get lucky and best case scenario, the recast unlike AM can act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Pavarti31 Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 There's a pretty decent chance that AMC is going to feel the loss of TK and AM more than they expect. I don't think they're smart enough to realize how badly they pissed Zenfans off. It will be interesting to see. PS TK's hair is glossy not greasy. There's a difference, and it's called shampooing (Pav, a former cutter and salon-owner speaking.). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Pavarti31 Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 BTW, NB is a weenie. Intresting that he spews carp and can't be replied to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Juliajms Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 How is it AMC's fault that TK doesn't want to move to LA? And while there may be pissed off Zen fans there are also those of us who are celebrating right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Pavarti31 Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 Well, I didn't say it was. But the show is losing it's premiere couple, whether you're a fan or not. They can move the show to LA, shoot in HD, and have the biggest studio on the lot. Unfortunately, they also still have the worst writer in town. I don't hold out much hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members bellcurve Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 The alleged actress in cahoots with Ed Scott. You don't have to spin the wheek or buy a vowel. Just "read what's up there." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jonathan Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 Your post reeks of disdain....and I love it! It's exactly how I feel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Heyou Posted October 11, 2009 Members Share Posted October 11, 2009 What's the difference between ad libbing and where do you draw the line? I know during LML's tenure at Y&R that she actually encouraged the actors to ad lib. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members MarkH Posted October 12, 2009 Author Members Share Posted October 12, 2009 Good question. Which is why I believe when Higley brought action against Scott, it wasn't necessarily that he was doing anything much different than oodles of other actors and directors and producers in daytime. The only difference is that she called the "cops". But at the time, such hue and cry was raised over Ed Scott's 'shameful' behavior. I'm trying to understand if the extent or magnitude of what he and the alleged actress were doing was any worse than what Thorsten Kaye or Anthony Geary or Hunter Tylo do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RomeAt50 Posted October 12, 2009 Members Share Posted October 12, 2009 I'm not surprised by that. In one of his interveiws he seemed to think Zach was pretty morally superior to Kendall and that the fact that she slepted with Ryan made all of Zach's recent wrongdoings irrelvant. I hate that his rewrites are making Kendall and Zach's relationship more unequal than it already is. He seems to need Zach to have the power and be in the right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.