Jump to content

B&B: October Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 176
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Marcus has LONG outlived his usefulness. That is one character that really needs to go and I dont get why B&B is dragging him along. He might be better to take if he were played by a more compelling actor but TB is hardly compelling and barely even tolerable to sit through

I forgot to mention but I see that Rocko is still around. I completely forgot about this guy. Can someone again remind me why they brought him back?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jack Wagner was awesome on Friday. I always knew JW had the acting chops- but he has been a supporting player all summer, and often Nick is written as a comical character. So Friday was a nice reminder of what JW can do, given the right material. Sometimes this show doesn't show too much emotion or what a character is really feeling- so the Nick & Bridget scenes were a treat.

In complete contrast, you have Pam acting like a fool with her cat impersonations on Donna's talkshow. Granted Pam adds comic relief to the show, but I thought the scenes were a bit cheesy...

Which ties in with what everyone is saying- B&B has the potential to be really good, but falls short sometimes.

I see a light at the end of the tunnel though. At least the never-ending Brooke/Ridge/Taylor triangle seems to be over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are you saying B&B has improved since I last watched? Can't remember when that was. Is it worth tuning in again?

That's not true.

I think I hinted at why Rocco was brought back, in a post about Hunter Tylo, but it was kinda cryptic at the time. Rocco was brought back b/c he was gonna be the forth wheel in the Brooke/Ridge/Taylor merry-go-round. He was initially supposed to be Taylor's new love interest, and Ridge was supposed to get jealous (after he moved out of Brooke's and back in with Taylor, as platonic buddies). Obviously, that all changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh....Rocco. Really? Really? Brad's throwing Taylor an incidental recurring guy? He's really investing in Taylor!

Still, that's different...and that is worthwhile.

I had assumed Thorne was gonna be back up for another round with Taylor. I guess I was wrong....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Great observations and very tue. I tend to put the blame and Brad's total un-commitment to any longterm story projection the last couple of years but a side-effect is that due to the heavy story-flip-flopping and Brad's usage of the VETERAN CAST (instead of newbies which you prop and drop in a heartbeat) which makes some striking errors and shifts of focus way more apparent than on a show like GH where characters are assassinated (no pun intened) as regularly but there is a much wider revolving door.

Unbelievable that B&B's clever management and steady international income hinders story development. The show could really profit from a little Ridge/Brooke or Ridge/Taylor hiatus. Two staright months without any of them could allow some serious retooling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wai, wait, wait.

I need to re-write this sentence.

You wanted to say: I tend to put the blame on Brad's total un-commitment to any longterm story projection the last couple of years. The side effect of the un-commitment is that due to heavy story flip-flopping and use of veterans... This is when I get lost and just... What?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Looks like they never removed it as it is still there as of this reply.
    • In a way, it's a shame that Lynne Adams decided to leave the show when she did, because I think Mike and Leslie were positioned very well to become GL's tentpole couple.
    • Correct. Lynne Adams (Leslie) decided she wanted to leave the show, as Leslie hadn't been given much to do since Adams returned as Leslie in 1973 (and now everyone can witness her first scene returning as Leslie in 1973 on YT - unreal) I don't think the Dobsons tried to stop that from happening, as I think they wanted Mike single again. I agree, @DeeVee - they should have let Mike and Leslie have a child together. I wonder it they thought it would be too strange to have two siblings that could also be cousins 

      Please register in order to view this content

      . As far as Ed and Holly go, at least they allowed Ed to show up at the end of TGL and take Holly on a "trip around the world". IMHO, I don't think Peter Simon had as much chemistry with Maureen Garrett as Mart Hulswit had, but I'm glad the show gave them a final scene together.
    • IF this gets a renewal I can't see LY sticking around    
    • Well, I'm glad to know Devane and I are on the same wavelength, lol.  But seriously.  I don't believe there's any other word to describe the machinations that the producers constructed in the name of keeping Greg and Paige apart.  Greg and Paige made Sam and Diane look mature by comparison! Which would have been just as well, since a character like Greg Sumner didn't really belong in the '90's, as the storyline with the task force proved only too well.  If KL had returned for another season, it would've needed a MASSIVE overhaul, including ditching Greg, Paige, Claudia and Anne.  Mack and Karen would've needed to be there for the sake of continuity; and maybe some mileage could've been gained from exploring Gary's new life as a widowed single father.  (I still would've loved to bring back Julie Harris and have Lilimae help Gary take care of the twins).  Otherwise, it would've been a new era for KL, one without The Sumner Group, or stories like Wolfbridge and Empire Valley.
    • This is "Last Call" for anyone who wants to download a copy of any of these Award show files. Daytime Emmys, Full Episodes: 1982, .. 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, .. 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995 Daytime Emmys, Extras or Partials: 1990 1998 SOD Awards
    • What he said. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Didn't she know when she involved him in her scheme, before the character was introduced? I thought she tracked down Janice's son and poisoned his mind against Rachel in order to get him on board.  It's a bit confusing because in the summer of 1988 we get a lot of Drew Marsten (whom I had forgotten was Nicole's ex) and mentions of a mysterious Countess and also Reginald working to undermine Cory. Drew disappears around the same time Evan arrives, and gradually we get the reveals that he is in cahoots with Iris, Janice's son, etc. 
    • I apply totally different standards. For Felicia & anyone else in Bay City it's reel as opposed to out here in the universe where it's real.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy