Jump to content

And so it begins. The death of Y&R


Recommended Posts

  • Members

what about Jepordy, Wheel, Ent Tonight, Acc Hollywood, The Insider, Extra?

Perhaps Oprah could go to 2, amc to 2, oltl to 4, gh at 4, and then game show/ent show at 7?

and then what do they air in the daytime?

I also think a good solution can be soaps operating under a small budget. Days got a 40% slash and is doing it, idk if they could go any cheaper tho. This means less sets, smaller casts, and fewer stories at once - all things modern soap fans bitch about. also, top stars need to take a pay cut or be fired. end of story. the buisness they in is not making it what use to be, so what makes them think they should? soaps need to work with them tho, if they are making less they should have a lighter sch.

if soaps could do it, networks need to rebuild daytime line ups. and not expect massive ratings from it. 2.0's seems to be the average for daytime now.

ABC Daytime could look like this. next to each slot i put what is airing now-

9: Regis/Kelly (now- same)

10: View (now- same)

11: game/judge/ent show (now- news)

12: news (now- amc)

1- talk show (one that features soap stars as guests!) (now- oltl)

2- amc (now- gh)

3- oltl (now- Oprah)

4- gh (now- news)

5- oprah (now- news)

6- local news/national new (now- same)

7- game show/ent show (now- wheel/jepordy)

NBC is the net that can really use an overhaul and see if it works...

10- talk show (today)

11- judge shows (news/acc hollywood)

12- News (game show)

1- game shows (days)

2- talk show (martha)

3- Ellen (bonnie hunt)

4- new soap (ellen)

5- Days (news)

6- local/national news (same)

7- ent shows(same)

or even move ellen/new soap/days back an hour, put news on at 5. i would love it if they would air dats at 7, swapping it with ent shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Let's Make A Deal will air at 10 AM in Atlanta. WLKY is not the

only CBS affiliate to carry Y&R at 4; WRAL Raleigh also does this,

beats Oprah, and has the top-rated 5 PM news.

Possibly WGCL believes Y&R is the strongest lead-in to its 4 PM

newscast that it can find.

As for "the death of Y&R," I think ATWT will go first...in fact

I predict its demise as of Sept. 17, 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So would I! Although I think your affiliate (and mine) rely heavily on the entertainment shows at 7pm -- it is their bread-and-butter. Celebrity gossip is practically Cali and NY's only growth industry at the moment!

I also love your space for a new soap on NBC (please, not another Passions, though).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

not another passions at all, i agree. if they want a strong daytime lineup they NEED a new soap, and they should make it a modern soap, but classic. simple. deal with real issues, blah blah blah. look at the 70's and update the storys for the most part, lol

also here in LA, our local station is also moving the sch around. Rachel Ray, who is now on at 9, will move to 2p - the old GL slot, and TPIR will move to 9am, and LMAD will take its 10am slot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now... I AGREE about soaps airing in the late afternoon. Networks shied away form this in the past, because for whatever reason it didn't work for The Edge Of Night. But I know in St. Louis, since it airs at 4PM... they have a strong lead in for their local news, and it works very well, catching the "after-school" viewer. Now, Wheel does get great ratings in that early evening slot, but it's the SLOT, not the show neccesarily. It kind of struggled at 10 AM from 1976-81, and then when it moved to nightime.... it took OFF. and it certainly wasn't Sajak making the ratings go up... the man has the personality of a wet dishrag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I lived in California in the late 80's and they moved GH to 4pm there and it did horribly at that time, so they moved it to a different time and it did alot better.

I can't see a timeslot change making a difference. If people want to watch they will, if they don't, a time change isn't going to get them to watch.

They have to WANT to watch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

they have. they have actually been up in ratings compared to last year almost every week. they also usually gain overall ratings every week and when they tumnble they bounce back. i would say losing john/mar/patch/kayla/tony really helped days.

here are last weeks ratings numbers-

4. DAYS 2,720,000 (+8,000/+115,000)

so they gained 8,000 people from last week and 115,000 from last year.

now compare to ATWT-

7. ATWT 2,348,000 (-50,000/-131,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Are you sure about this?

I thought Let's Make a Deal was getting the post-Early Show slot.

I do think it's weird that they are pairing Deal and Price together instead of allowing Deal to stand on it's own post-ATWT. If an affiliate IS told by CBS to pair Wayne and Drew together, I could see more affiliates not wanting to give up their lucrative post-Early show programming(i.e. smaller affiliates that may carry Regis & Kelly, Dr. Phil, The Doctors, or any other high performing talk show) and scheduling Deal at 12Noon/11CST(in places where Y&R airs after Price with No news Breaks) and moving Y&R to 2PM/3PMCST.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I can't fully remember, but I don't think they tried to get Beth Chamberlin back. I think Laibson/McTavish likely saw Beth as old news and wanted to move Philip on; either that or have her return only when Philip was closely tied to a new woman. Thanks as always for these recaps. I think I had stopped watching around this time and mostly kept up by reading in the soap magazines. Bridget's degradation was horrible to watch, as the character had grown so much over the years and was clearly regressed just to be a foil for a "hot" couple viewers had zero investment in. 
    • Having the majority of the cast on those low numbers is no way to tell story. And just 2 dayplayers for the month. So sad for the #1 soap.  
    • I believe it was. And this is actually one of the cases where I wouldn’t mind some dumb soap opera bringing back from the dead. They gave Mishael, Amanda, with all of Hilary’s connections but none of the personality except for fleeting moments. Hilary absolutely should’ve just left town. They decided to kill her and the baby. Just baffling,
    • That was Mal Young right? He thought a tragic death was a better option than crafting a story where Hilary leaves town. Was it a case of punishing someone who wants to leave? And then they have to jump through hoops to bring the actress back.
    • Ooo @TaoboiI will say I just watched Amanda give it to Abby and I loved it. Honestly just made me miss Hilary more. I will never understand or get over that decision to kill her off. Also call me crazy but I could definitely see the Damian actor playing NuTed on BTG. Very much still enjoying the Lily attraction.
    • I rewatched these episodes---they broke my heart. Somehow, Nola had seen Vanessa leave the hospital, and follows her home, and Maeve just lets out this primal scream---chills went down my spine. And knowing the history between them---never quite liking the other and always getting on each other's nerves (to put it mildly)---makes it a much richer to have them put it all aside in the moment and be family to each other. I've never seen/heard what Maeve thought of the story itself, but she did want a break, so it's not like she was fired and then brought back. Yes, Vanessa could be this stubborn and unwilling to ask for help. She'd pretty much always been an "I can do this on my own" type of woman, although when she first came to town, she would still run to Henry. But after she met Billy, she stopped relying on her father. It's part of the reason she (briefly) got addicted to pills after Bill's birth---she was determined to take care of him all by herself and became obsessed with the idea she was the only one who could. Of course, nothing before to this extreme. I should say, there's no way (IMO) they could've told this story---Vanessa letting her loved ones thinking she'd died---if her father Henry had still been alive. She never would've been able to do that to him. And it does chafe that she's letting Bill believe it, when her mantra had been all about protecting him since the day he was born. I honestly don't recall what I thought about it at the time. But now I'm thrilled she's free of Matt at least. LOL.
    • I had no idea Peter Reckell was 70. He doesn’t look or feel it and I guess I thought Bo and Hope were closer in age than 9 years. Wow even the new writers had to have Jack praise Leo. Melissa Reeves continues to slip back in effortlessly as Jennifer. I like Ari and Holly being old friends. Holly learning about John’s death reminded me of how John used to call her Nikki if my memory is serving me right. Doug who happily sleeps in high school Holly’s room shirtless and in his underwear is now asking about birth years. How old is he anyway?    The Cat and Chad romance is insulting. 
    • Her husband is Marty Levy. Chocolate Fortunes (her company) was started in 1987.  So that explains the mystery of 'Whatever happened to Pam Peters?' She had been running a successful business for decades.
    • KMH's Emily was a harbinger for the lack of dignity many characters would face in the last decade of ATWT. On paper, many of the stories given to Melanie Smith's Emily could have been extremely sleazy, but she was treated with respect and understanding in the writing. By 1996 the show went from often not knowing how to write for KMH's Emily to giving her outright reprehensible material. There were breaks from this treatment, but not enough, with even those breaks often being poorly written or just used to make her look even worse (like her grotesque rape story turning into her using her rape to destroy Margo's marriage).  By the last years I don't even know what the hell they were doing. Wasn't there some kind of mother-daughter whoring story with Emily and Alison? Wasn't Emily getting beaten up by johns? Whenever I think of how they wrote for KMH's Emily I'm reminded of Pauline Kael's quote about Ann-Margaret's '60s movie persona - calling her "dirty" and saying the people who made the movies "knew what men wanted to do to her."  Even as much as ATWT started hiring softcore actors in the mid/late '90s, the Emily treatment was on a whole other level. I have never known what audience they thought they were going to be attracting.
    • At this point the options are 1. Leslie is going to be caught out, arrested and jailed. Hit and run, blackmail etc. 2. She gets off due to lack of evidence. Second option keeps her on the show but how are they going to keep her a viable character? No one should want to have anything to do with her. If they keep her around, won't other characters come off looking stupid for putting up with her? I'm interested to see where they go with this character/story and hope not to be disappointed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy