Jump to content

Search For Tomorrow Discussion Thread


Paul Raven

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The Syracuse NY University Library houses the Ralph Ellis papers. 

Ralph Ellis Search for Tomorrow Collection

An inventory of the collection at Syracuse University

Overview of the Collection

Creator:Ellis, Ralph (soap opera writer)

Title:Ralph Ellis Search for Tomorrow Collection

Inclusive Dates:1971-1974

Quantity:7 linear ft.

Abstract:Scripts, breakdowns, story projections for the daytime television drama Search for Tomorrow.

Also, the contents of the boxes is listed, by date & most of it is scripts. Only one box is breakdowns. Too much to copy in here. But it can all be seen here 

https://library.syracuse.edu/digital/guides/e/ellis_search_for_tom.htm 

They have a policy of doing an hour of research for free. Other methods for remote researchers are outlined.

Plus anyone local has full, free access, only making an appt. is required.

This may also be of interest. This is from their order form for copies of items in the collection. Choices include: paper, pfs, jpg. 25¢ (This is not for print quality. For print tiff or jpeg & cost is higher.) Most of rest is std.

Not Syracuse, in Schemering a high rating is listed for SFT In 1952-53, 16.1 Nielsen rating. Of course, the number of households would have been substantially lower.

Edited by Contessa Donatella
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was wondering if anyone has a strong guess about the dates for these summer 1966 episodes? In the first episode, Andrea says Len and Patti will be married on July 8th. An episode or two after that has a character saying that the wedding is "five weeks" away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Finally finished the first of the summer 1966 videos and watched a little of the second. 

- What exactly is the backstory with the Reynolds family? I got something where Sam had to lie and take the blame for something he didn't do. And Len having a brother. Did the brother die? Was there a fire?

- It's funny how these soap blocs of episodes work. I've read so much about Andrea, and about all the Patty Parade, and when a ton of episodes appear, it's with an Andrea I had never even heard of (Virginia Gilmore) and a Patty I mostly knew from a photo in an old soap magazine (Melissa Murphy). I am pretty sure the photo came from one of these episodes as the pose is exact (it's one of her staring into the distance in her nurses' uniform). 

- Looking through some posts from about 15 years ago I see why a few bits of this are vaguely familiar - saynotoursoap had posted an episode that must be from this same set (the one where Jo vents to Bob about the burden Sam was putting on Patti and talking about how Sam was replacing her relationship with Arthur).

- The Patti/Andrea/Jo/Sam/Len story seems one-note on the surface but is surprisingly rich underneath - Jo and Sam on opposite sides, but also on the same side, but Jo struggling to get past her anger toward him over Arthur's death. This all slowly boils under the constant melodrama with Patti, Len and Andrea. I don't really know why Patty even wants Len, given how childish he is (Dino is a good actor though), but I do enjoy seeing her fight what is a constant losing battle against Andrea. 

- What makes this so delicious to watch is the writing having respect for the characters and for us. Most soaps would write Patty as a fool, with Andrea running rings around her, but Patty clearly knows just how manipulative Andrea is, and even manages to convince those around her who would have given Andrea the benefit of the doubt. This awareness means that you don't just see Patty as a cipher.

- Thanks to @Paul Raven we know why Gilmore left (for a teaching position). I am glad to know it was her choice to leave because she's great in these episodes. She's very believable at 'nice nasty,' so you understand why Len is fooled by her. She underplays the poison even when alone. I know nothing of Gilmore or her career, but I'm extremely impressed with her work in this first batch of episodes.

- I appreciate how the writing, and most of all the measured work of Mary Stuart, brings out the psychological aspects of the Sam/Len/Andrea mess and the Len/Andrea relationship, without feeling like the characters are reading from a textbook.

- This is by far the most I've seen of Stu and Marge together. I'm glad that even with the 15-minute runtime there's enough to allow for glimpses of their married life, natural even as they recap plot. I can see why viewers loved them. I've rarely seen such a simple but effective quasi-comedic duo on a soap, especially in these years. There's a lot of talk these days about "positive masculinity," which unfortunately seems to mean shooting up steroids while listening to Rogan, but we get the real version with Stu. He watches sports (we even see him watching TV - I wonder if we ever see Jo watching TV) and doesn't know what a "boutique" is, but he loves his friends dearly and wears his heart on his sleeve. I'm reminded again and again of just what an understated but brilliant actor Larry Haines is in dramatic moments - just watch his work when he tells Jo that Arthur's land struck saltwater, not oil. Yet Melba Rae matches him beat for beat. 

- "Junior" is their baby, right? Is this after Janet was off the canvas for a while and their son was made into their nephew? Is the son/nephew already gone?

- I notice that Patty and Emily are both full of what used to be called having "pep in your step," or what Marvel used to call "snappy patter." I'm reminded of how Leslie Jackson was the same way on GL in the episodes from around this same time. I think @vetsoapfan or others have mentioned that Alice on AW was portrayed in a similar way early on. I wonder if the P&G soaps were trying to react to the 'youth craze.'

- Something else that stands out and which I think is very smart is having the younger set all bursting with life, anxieties, resentments, hopes, dreams, while the older characters are restrained, scarred by the years, but still alive. This is an inverse of soaps in modern decades, where the younger characters often feel much less vibrant than the older characters. 

- A few days ago, I was reading an old Youtube comment thanking Mary Stuart for how much her work had meant to this viewer, how she had always felt like someone they knew. That's very much on display here. She makes you feel every bit of Jo's inner turmoil, playing the pain so subtly, honestly. This is some juicy melodrama, but Stuart never plays it as such.

- Melissa Murphy does a very good job playing all the different sides of Patty, but...silly as it is for me to say she's "wrong" as Patty given how little I've seen of the character, I just don't think she suits as Jo's daughter. She's missing the haunted quality I think makes sense for Patty, and I don't sense a big connection between Murphy and Stuart. 

- I've said for years that I believe soaps should try a 15-minute format again, and these episodes I would use as a chief example of why. They are able to keep a small canvas and focus almost exclusively on one story, a story that would be exhausting if the show ran for 30 minutes (don't even want to think about an hour). 

- Of the few stories on display that aren't the big one...

- I am very glad to get to see these glimpses of the Allens. As mentioned, I do wonder what plans the show even would have had for them. Were they planning early for a half-hour extension? They seem a bit younger than Jo, Stuart or Marge. I'm not sure if that was intended. I can't see any big couple swap going on here. Maybe Bill would have caused Stuart business trouble? I wish they could have stayed around. I like the idea of the two of them living in Henderson, offcamera, years earlier, having stories with "our" characters that we never saw. (I also feel stupid for thinking their son, played by Bobby Breen, was the child star, as I didn't realize he would have been about 40 at this time)

- Does anyone know if the story with Emily dating (?) her college professor was ever an actual story or just something that happened offcamera?

- You can see what a disaster is on the way with Emily's love for Nick (and Nick leading her on). On paper, it's a story I'd have a difficult time watching, but there's something I can't look away from in how earnestly Pamela Murphy plays Emily's devotion. She also has a regality about her. I see that she was on Dallas as a character named Marie. Did she and Ken Kercheval interact? Do we know why Nick was recast? Did the original actor want to leave? I wonder just where Ken's mind may have been in these early episodes. Only about two or three episodes into his run as Nick he is having surprisingly intense tonsil hockey with Murphy (you can decide for yourself at 8 and 33 minutes).

Please register in order to view this content

Anyway, I've been enthralled by these episodes, helped by their being in easily digestible form. I haven't ever read much about this time, other than the Andrea climax a few years later. Sometimes I get the feeling this period would be seen later on as old hat and the early '70s would bring the refresh, but this all seems very strong to me, much more than I had expected.

Edited by DRW50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@DRW50 Such interesting comments. Thanks for taking the time.

Junior is Stu Bergman who got renamed Tom when the charater was aged up.

Janet left in 65 I think after helping Marge with the pregnancy.

Jimmy the son/nephew left in 62 never to be mentioned again.

I vaguely recall that Burr De Benning got a Broadway show. He might only have been recurring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Melissa Murphy has two entries on IMDb as Melissa Murphy (her first husbands last name who she was married 1959-1973) and Melissa Converse (reverting to her maiden name after her divorce). She is the stepdaughter of actor Don Porter (Gidget) which she appeared in an episode. She was acting up till 2011. I remember her on guest appearances on Charlie's Angels and Eight Is Enough. She remarried in 1981 to a John C. Ewing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, it was common in the 1960s for young women and girls to be portrayed in a limited, two-dimensional way in films and TV. They were not always portrayed as individualistic, nuanced characters, but rather as overexcitable, giddy, and somewhat flaky. It wasn't realistic, but I imagine the audience was used to it. Think of the Beach Blanket movies, Gidget, or sitcom teens like Lucy's daughter Chris from The Lucy Show.

Jacquie Courtney started out in this style,  but somewhere early on she began to tone down the elastic facial expressions and became more thoughtful and realistic in her portrayal. This, to me, allowed her natural sweetness and vulnerability to shine through. "Less is more," as they say, and less mugging allows for more depth and truth in performances.

JC's revised handling of Alice helped her grow into a daytime legend.

Please register in order to view this content

BTW, to illustrate what I mean about the portrayal of teens from the 1960s in the media, this clip shows what I am trying to say. The kids involved are fun to watch in this one-off film, but such larger-than-life behavior would grate on my nerves on a daily soap where everything and everyone else is more subdued. If Penny Hughes had been like this, she never would have become...PENNY HUGHES.

Please register in order to view this content

@DRW50, your extensive commentary here was great. It's always a pleasure to read your posts.

Edited by vetsoapfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jimmy was introduced and referred to on-camera as the Bergmans' son. 

He drifted out of sight for a while, and when he came back, he was suddenly their nephew. 

Then he just disappeared for good. As you say, never to be seen or mentioned again.

WTF?

Such incompetence on the part of TPTB.

The show also dropped all references to Stu and Jo being step-siblings (their widowed parents married each other later in life). I thought this was a mistake, too, since the good friends then became even more closely connected. But at least TIIC didn't suddenly announce one day that Stu was, in fact, Jo's nephew!

Please register in order to view this content

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Jo's sister in law Louise lasted a few years and then vanished. She might have been a useful character to be used later on. Surely Louise would want some contact with her niece Patti.

What happened to Irene Barron? Did she die or just disappear? I know that every character can't remain on canvas, but a reference to Irene from time to time or news of her death would keep the connection with viewers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@Paul Raven Thanks for all your answers and kind words. Makes sense as to why Burr would leave in that case. I sure miss the New York soaps and what they were able to do for theater actors. 

I always get confused over the other Bergman child. Makes no sense to just forget/rewrite/forget, although I know that was much more common in these years.

Speaking of that, when Jo was saying all she had was Patty (very poignant), I thought this would be the perfect time for her to mention losing Duncan Eric, as he was Arthur's son. I guess he was out of sight, out of mind. 

Something else I appreciated in these episodes and don't see often on soaps past the '70s or so is the characters having little moments like crossword puzzles or card games to help ease us into their conversations. They wanted us to think of these characters as being real.

@SoapDope I didn't know that. Wish IMDB could combine them.

@vetsoapfan That clip is perfect for what we were talking about. I can even see Emily in there...

Thanks for your kind words. I don't have the best turn of phrase but when I actually do enjoy soap content as much as I enjoyed these episodes, I need to get the words out while I can. If you were watching the episodes at the time they aired I hope they bring back good memories for you. 

I totally forgot Jo and Stu were step-siblings at one point.

@chrisml That's such a great find. I didn't even know of this other sister. Those blurbs are the closest we'll get to seeing many of these episodes, unless we develop time travel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

This is from the June 14, 1986 edition of Billboard Magazine. It's about the new theme song for SFT. Thought might be of some interest.

Please register in order to view this content

I have been going through the Billboard archives looking for info on SFT. I found a minor article about some BTS changes on the soaps. The interesting tidbit is the merry-go-round of staff and the fact that legendary actress Frances Reid was fired from a soap called Portia Faces Life. It did not last much longer after her firing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thanks @chrisml . I had never known anything about that final theme or who wrote it, or maybe I had just forgotten because it was never very memorable to me. I'd say scoring a theme to a soap about to be canceled is another sign of his industry fortunes, but he did win an Emmy and we're talking about him 40 years later, so who am I to criticize? 

I have to say I prefer the instrumental. Here is the video for the album version, which features four of the stars of Search's final year. If you ever fantasized about Matt Ashford starring in Grease, this is your moment.

Please register in order to view this content

I wish more of those early short-lived soaps were available, although the scraps we've seen haven't exactly been enthralling. 

I'm not sure they ever said the state. I used to think it was New York but I am not sure why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It does have a very distinct 80's vibe to it, but it was nice seeing the actors do their thing. I'm not sure what the thing was, but it was nice. 

Found a Letter to the Editor in the April 26, 1954 edition of Life Magazine:

 

Please register in order to view this content

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recent Posts

    • She would be great, but I of course am thinking of her in What's Love Got to Do with It.
    • Agreed that they had a home in the present tense of the first set of episodes.  But I was wondering if they lived in the mansion in the past when Sophia disappeared, and moved out when Santana got pregnant?  Or even when Danny was born.
    • According to the French Santa Barbara site the Andrades had a house in the early episodes.  I thought I remembered scenes in their home. The Andrade house
    • I always wondered if the Andrades lived at the Capwell Mansion?  Certainly they could've had a living room in their space or wherever they went on days off. But, I felt like it was never clear whether Santana visited Rosa when Kelly and Eden were young, or if she actually lived in the servant's quarters (one hopes modern developers have found a euphemism for that space).  I always imagined that Rosa, Santana, and Reuben lived with CC up until Channing was murdered, and then they found their own place because the kids were mostly over 18 (and Santana was pregnant). I like the idea of Rueban and CC being close until Santana got pregnant.  And then Reuben would've hated the adoption of Brandon.  Which would have meant he hated CC, and would've only continued to work for him to try to get info on whatever happened to his grandson. With regard Ava Lazar, having recently rewatched the pilot for the millionth time, I find her captivating to watch, but her line delivery is so dull. She looks amazing, and I just want her to be more quick witted.
    • I liked the original 4 family set up.  The families were all different from each other and were intertwined.  They should have been given equal airtime. I felt that Lockridges were perfectly cast with the exception of Laken.  She should have been quickly recast.   I liked all 4 of the actors cast as the Andrades and wish they would have been given better writing.  I really thought Ava Lazar (Santana) would have been one of the breakout stars if she had not been replaced. My only issue with the casting of the Perkins family was Robert Alan Browne as John and as much as I liked Mark Arnold he was the wrong actor to recast Joe Perkins. And of course it was ridiculous how badly they screwed up the casting of CC. The other Capwells were well cast.
    • This late 1976 stuff doesn't sound as bad as it has in other versions I've read (weekly recaps from Jon-Michael Reed and SOD synopses). I am surprised that there is a variation of Ian - Meg - Arlene - Tom playing out this late in the game, but it doesn't sound half bad. Ian's involvement with Beaver Ridge and how it impacts Rick and Cal's future also intrigued me  more than I expected. Even the Carrie - Betsy connection having Carrie watch Suzanne while Ben is visiting was a nice surprise. I feel like this all falls apart pretty quickly with the arrival of Mia Marriott, Michael Blake, and a slew of other half baked characters under Upton.  
    • Too bad she ended up on Y&R. Actress Valarie Pettiford might've been "Sharon" because she sings too and does it pretty well.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • @NothinButAttitude thanks for sharing the rough draft. I had bought "Shadows on the Wall" from Kathryn Leigh Scott's website probably 20+ years ago. It's a fascinating read into a very different version of what the show could have been. 
    • @Efulton That's the quote I was refering to. In the bible, at almost the beginning, Rueben and C.C. were compared as being similar as two fathers wanting everything for their children, or something along those lines. I do think the Andrades were intended to have more of a role, but they never even garnered a family set (just Santana's apartment). In 1991, they added the Capwell kitchen which seemed to be a domestic space for Rosa, but clearly not solely Rosa's. I feel like I remember Rosa confronting Santana about her feelings for C.C. being an attempt to recreate her grand fantasy with Channing, Jr. in the kitchen, but more likely that was the bedroom Santana was redecorating (C.C.'s master suite) utilizing the designsshe had envisioned for herself and Channing, Jr.  
    • On the French Santa Barbara site Ismael Carlo did not hold back about how he felt about the Dobsons. http://santabarbara-online.com/index2.htm How did you start in Santa Barbara ? My recollection is that I auditioned for the role. After a couple of weeks of contract negotiations I was told that all was in order and that I would start work in a couple of weeks or so. But that's when the sh*t hit the fan. In her high petulant way she (Bridget Dobson) commenced to tell me how all her South American workers were beholding to her. How she treated them, "like children". I said to her, "I'm not a child". She got upset and started to cry. I told her that if she did not want me on the show, all she had to do was break the contract and pay me. It never happened. The Dobsons, who were the producers, where a pair of what you would call in your country aristocrats in their minds. I almost quit just before I started. But like any actor at the time I stuck it out all because of the work. I don't think I will ever sell my soul again. I was also able to perform with the lead actor and director in a production of his: Romeo & Juliet. I played Papa Capulet.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy