Jump to content

Scott Hamner Says Y&R Is NOT Doing A Gay Story


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

No, Maria Arena Bell is a proven coward. Or hypocrite, or executive, or politician. They backed out of gay material. That's cowardly, but it's not proof of lying all along. I think they'd planned to do some kind of big story with Phillip the Woolly Mammoth, they certainly had a big enough PR push. I also think they've backed away from it.

Who at Y&R sullied Chris Engen's reputation? You're alleging a conspiracy with Bell where none exists. No one at the show came out and said he left over the gay material, but no one came out and said he didn't either, or that it was not a major factor. I'm not excusing Y&R's lame storytelling with 'the gays' but that doesn't change that a 'phobe is a 'phobe is a 'phobe. I can be annoyed with both Bell and Engen at once. It is not an issue of taking sides with Chris Engen versus Maria Bell and bad storytelling, because I don't think he cared about "bad storytelling." People have built this kid up into some great social figurehead representing all the ills of the Maria Bell regime when in fact it seems he mostly left because he worried about having to get intimate with another guy. Chris Engen is the Manchurian Candidate for y'all. I'm saying, find someone else.

I've already called Y&R's "gay" storytelling bad, but cara mia's post is just as OTT and silly as anything in the Adam/Rafe story. These people may be incompetent, or they may be backbiting, or they may be both at once sometimes, but it's not like they're Darth Vader and his cronies. They're not that bright or devious or evil. It's just daytime television. They were stupid. They did not sit in the Death Star plotting to destroy Chris Engen's life and make over the show into a gay hive of scum and villainy.

You've never found me cheerleading the MAB regime. I gave the Y&R storylines with Phillip and Adam an open mind, and they flopped. They were lame. But blowing it up into a meta-issue with Chris Engen and 'refusing to play gay' as a symbol of creative freedom under a disliked regime offends me, and I will always object to that characterization of this situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't think I'm asleep. Here's the reason I'm wondering about this: Hamner HAD to know about the interview that Maria gave Branco, and the amount of Pimping out to the gay press that Gellman, Muhney, and especially Bierdz did. This IS SOW wer'e talking about. If it were a news source that didn't take things out of context and twist semantics on a weekly basis to make things sound more dramatic and tittilating, then I wouldn't be wondering... but you can understand, can't you? Something isn't adding up here, after I think about it. Cause if Hamner truly KNEW what Maria said, and then she marched out Muhney, Gellman, and Bierdz to ramp up publicity.... then his statement would be tantamount to calling his boss a liar, wouldn't it? If he was referring to ONLY Adam/Rafe, then that WOULD mesh with what Maria said all along (That Adam/Rafe is not the gay story, not the endgame, etc.) That comment that Alvin posted that LED UP to Hamner's quote did NOT come out of Hamner's mouth... it came from someone at SOW. So here's the question... is this columnist at SOW making assumptions about Hamner's quote, reaching for stuff to cause controversy? It's possible. Something is just off here. Or else, Hamner is a moron and just got himself in trouble by making his boss look like a lying, manipulative bitch. If they changed their minds and backed out due to viewer outrage, then why didn't Hamner just SAY SO? Saying this really makes Maria look like a liar..... and most people who want to keep their jobs don't do such things to their boss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hamner was giving fall previews, he knows about all of the upcoming storylines, and he clearly stated nothing involving a gay storyline was going to be explored, and nothing in the fall previews invovled any gay character or gay romance either.

Maria knows what she was doing, she's the one that sent Hamner to give previews and interviews to the press.

Maria clearly changed her mind about doing any gay storyline or she was just lying all along to get the attention of the gay media.

If there was any gay storyline coming up, surely Hamner would have stated it in the previews he gave the magazines...

You honestly think they would admit that?

And how do we know Maria isn't a liar? Have you seen any indication of a gay storyline being built up to on this show? I sure haven't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Vee are you Nelson Branco? Cause that's the only excuse I can come up with for your continued vilification of someone based on NO real evidence. The truth is no one knows for sure why Engen quit. All we know is that he said he's not a homophobe and ED & EB backed up that he left because the general dark nature of the character. Branco, clearly being fed spin by PR & MAB, painted CE as a homophobe on no real evidence. Branco admitted that he even lied about the kiss (so as not to ruin a plot point -- GMAFB at that malarkey) and MAB has been proven to be a liar many times over as well as a cheat (NP). My point is that people deserve the benefit of the doubt UNTIL it is proven that they don't deserve it. CE may or may not be a homophobe -- I don't know. But there is no clear evidence that he is and plenty of evidence that he was dismayed by the writing for Adam in general. My goodness -- the character burned a fetus in the fireplace! Why wouldn't he consider leaving? He said MAB only gave him one meeting. Isn't is possible that he wanted to understand what the hell was going on with the writing and the motivations for Adam and that MAB, being the hack that she is, could not answer his questions? KSJ is also on record about being unhappy about the writing. Why is it so hard to accept creative differences as the real crux of the problem? That's just as valid a theory as closet homophobia. People should not be accused of something as despicable as homophobia or racism without real evidence.

On the other hand, there is NO evidence that MAB "intended" to do a real gay story. There is plenty of evidence that she is a lying liar who lies. Who cares if TB is not a hit with the viewers? A gay story was promised. No one likes Tyra but she had TWO romances, including one with her f*cking nephew! Billy & Mac is made of epic fail but they got a romance. Even stupid Esther got a romance with David Leisure. And where is the great fanbase for Glo & Jeff? Folks hate them but they got a love story. And what about Deacon? He abuses Amber and we have to endure them getting intimate onscreen and now he is "rewarded" with a turn at Vicky! There is NO F*CKING EXCUSE for not giving P3 a romance. It could be lame and chaste and boring (like all the Y&R "romances") but it should still happen. I don't care if TB can't act. He's not the only lousy actor on this show!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

We don't know that, Alvin.... I realize that, believe me. It just makes no sense from a public relations standpoint to court the gay press, all the while never having ANY intention of coming up with the goods... and then ADMITTING in the press that "ha-ha we never had any intention of doing this, screw y'all!" It seems beyond the pale of fool-hardiness, don't you think? If they backed out due to viewer outrage, one would THINK Maria and Co. would rather been seen as cowards as opposed to manipulative liars, don't you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think this was their way of doing damage control, so they can say they didn't lead the audience into wanting the gay storyline they initially promised them. This way, they don't have to deliver on anything, since they came out and admitted to the press that they're not doing a gay storyline.

I think Kenny at DR summed it up nicely by saying this:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Would that I were for his salary. No, I am not Branco and I don't like Branco's brand of so-called "journalism." That doesn't change the fact that he's right sometimes. It killed me when he scooped Andrea Evans' exit from OLTL last year.

No real evidence? This story was not only picked up by Branco. It got out there from somewhere.

We can go around and around on conspiracy theories and valid complaints about the show, but I think there's room for those complaints, executive incompetence, and a bigoted actor in the middle of it all. Based on what I heard from a number of sources, I believe the Chris Engen story. Holding him and his supposed refusal to play the material as a banner in this endless debate over Y&R is what offends me, because I think it sends the wrong message and trivializes not only GLBT representation issues, but also the larger complaints about Y&R. The implication is if that you agree Y&R is a mess you must back Engen's quitting, and while I do think the show is a mess, I do not back him. And I think that there's just as much presumption in your tall tale of Chris Engen leaving as the leader of La Resistance as there is in my supposed 'presumption.'

As for Scott Hamner, he would never dare go out there and say "we backed off on the gays." No show is going to openly admit that. But he's all but done that by lying about their original intent. Bell practically got a tonguebath from Branco over the big re-introduction of Phillip III, and now there's nothing. They backed off because Y&R, the great "ornate couch" as I call it, is still behind the times and locked in a somewhat reactionary, '70s/'80s shock-value mindset when it comes to certain social issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Steve Kent and Barbara Bloom just need to take a page out of the New World "Book of Playing Dirty" and force the Bells(especially Maria) out of Y&R, or into a fancy co-EP title that means nothing.

Being Head-Writer of a TV Show is not a vehicle for your society luncheons or political career. She's a pathetic excuse of a "writer" and a woman. She wants to tout about her vision, but instead of taking responsibility for it when the time comes, she opts for the Barbara Walters Softballs while her equally talentless male Co-Heads take the heat in all the Diane Saywer-like interviews.

I hate this lady. I hate her story ideas, her ego, I hate what she's done to daytime's #1 show, and everything about her. Sylph has often accused Lethal of "hating" Y&R. I think Maria(and to a certain degree, Brad), hate daytime television, hence them undermining their audience and their inability to see beyond the two weeks they frantically and horribly plot before their tennis games and trips to Rodeo Drive. Why else do you explain the Bell Shows, both coming from a legacy of rich, interesting history, being trashed for the sake of cheap thrills and laughs?

Do they really believe their audience is a bunch of mindless, unemployed people? That's the only explanation for the inanity behind what's going on. Truly pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Where is the viewer outrage? People hated Rafe/Adam because of the recast, the bad writing and the general stupidity of the story. Adam can manipulate Victor easily but he has to resort to sex to trick Rafe? That's just stupid. Adam should have been playing on Rafe's feelings for him for a longtime and been genuinely trapped, i.e. caught red-handed before he felt that he had to sleep with Rafe. Anyway, what does that have to do with P3?! Just because Radam sank like the Titanic, doesn't mean that TPTB can't do a decent story for P3. First off, P3 is actually gay and not pretending! Second, he's not a psycho or a killer or the victim of being recasted beyond recognition. Even if Rafe is too young for him, why not bring on someone for P3? MAB brings on new characters every other day! Hell, steal from OLTL and bring on a gay cop investigating the "Art" thing and pair him with P3. It's not rocket science and it's not a big deal. One of the many reasons I refuse to drop the Engen issue is because MAB & Company refuse to see the failure of Radam is due to a revolt against NuAdam (the actor and the crazy writing) and NOT a revolt against a gay story. If TPTB had two licks of common sense they would have brought on Chance as a conflicted gay soldier (just like Fish on OLTL), paired him with a proudly out Rafe and thrown Adam in as the spoiler -- who led Rafe on for a good long while before (if ever) having sex with him. Chance & Rafe could have been HUGE! People want to see a good angsty gay love story between two actual gays. People also want to see young hot men (no offense to TB). How is that OLTL can do this so very well but TIIC at Y&R don't even know their asses from their elbows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Vee... thanks, I NEEDED a laugh right about now. BADLY. Now... ALVIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I went over to daytime royalty and read for myself, seems both YOU and KENNY are reaching a bit. You came over here and posted Hamner's quote... and you conveniently left of the last sentence of his quote, which is making my theory look much more likely:

"And, at this point, I don't see a future for Rafe and Adam."

Now, when I read THAT... it makes me think he WAS referring specifically to Rafe/Adam when he said they never had any intention of a gay SL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes. I don't think LML hated Y&R so much as she was apathetic about anything which didn't go along with what she wanted. She certainly didn't seem to hate characters like Nikki, who are a cornerstone of Y&R.

I do sense a very strange hatred towards everything that made Y&R the #1 show. Vets, female characters, black people, business stories, respect for history, slow, intelligent pacing. On and on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I feel like the lawsuit storyline was resolved quickly because the show didn’t want to spring for more sets.
    • It's been a while, but we have seen the foyer to Bill and Hayley's house as well as the exterior entrance to their house. The foyer was first seen in the premiere episode when Hayley met Vanessa at the house.
    • There's still a year or two before Larkin arrives. Joel is there already. EON does noticeably youthify, although I think they carry it off. Admittedly I haven't seen most of the Jody stories, which from what people here have said aren't great.
    • I don't mind the actor who plays Brian. He's fine. The problem for me is that Paige seems so wishy wishy. She doesn't seem to have much of a personality at this point so I don't see why Brian would be so besotted with her. She just lurches from one trauma to the next. Granted, it's only been a month, but she's not as vibrant as April or even Deborah who has had minimal screen time by this point.  I do worry about the influence of GH on the show since I'm in fall of 1979 and characters have conversations and there's not the drive to "youthify" the show. However, I think Marceau (sp?) is gone. He was given a rather tame sendoff. How long was the actor on the show? I hope this is not a sign of things to come. I worry the show is setting up a murder mystery around one of my favorite characters and I will be mightily annoyed. I also noticed in recent Search for Tomorrow episodes uploaded to YT that the actors playing Logan and Eliot showed up. I don't watch the show but they were in the screencaps. When does Larkin Malloy show up or has he already left? Joel Crothers hasn't shown up either unless I've blinked and missed him.
    • Dr Linden. She treated Vanessa's drug addiction (although Vanessa seemed to forget that by Henry's suicide attempt) , and she's mentioned during Reva's PPD. Although I can't recall if she's actually shown right off the top of my head. She probably was temporarily shelved when Sonni was a therapist (between her crazy times) And I think Billy sees her after he falls off the wagon after Reva's death.
    • Kinda agree. I have some issues with the sets. Nicole's living room is bland-looks like a display home. Bill and Hayley's is too small and basically hideous. And neither of them have a front door/entrance or staircase. People just appear from the corridor. Those green accents  at Uptown are way too much. Also,Naomi and Vanessa not having an office or a home .
    • Thanks @Paul Raven  That Grainger story always reads like hog-wild melodrama, not very similar to the more subtle stories for Rita in her last few years. I wonder how Lenore played the material.
    • More from 1976 Lynn, apparently making every effort to overcome her alcoholism, accepts a baby-sitting job. However, when the baby starts crying, Lynn begins to get nervous and takes one drink, then another. By the time Bruce and Van arrive home, Lynn is on the floor, ineffectually trying to find the doctor’s number, sure the baby is ill. When the mother arrives; she vows to let everyone know what goes on in the mayor’s house.Bruce insists that Lynn has to go, but Van, learning that Lynn can’t remember drinking the cooking sherry, calls Joe to report Lynn’s blackouts. Joe wants her institutionalized but gives in to Van’ s pleas that Lynn needs loving attention. Eddie has sent some of Felicia’s work to a New |York gallery owner and reports to Charles that Lisa Cooper wants to exhibit Felicia’s work. Charles refuses to tell her this and later admits he feels he has “cowed”her attention because of his being confined to a wheelchair. What Charles doesn’t say is: that he’s plagued with fears she’ll leave him for another man. Felicia is exuberant as she starts painting again. She tells Charles how she feels about it, but, jealous of anyone or anything that takes attention from him, Charles tries to undermine her confidence. Eddie finally professes his love for her. He will be happy to step forward if she will only let Be and admit that they belong together. Charles tries to stop Felicia’s ‘trip to New York by making her doubt her own work, and when that fails, he finds business reasons at his bookshop to keep Di, his ex-wife, who is running it for him, from accompanying her. Felicia finally decides it’s not going to work and tells Eddie they might as well call it off. Instead, he arranges for Lisa Cooper to come to Rosehill. Charles is rude and insulting to Lisa when she arrives at the house to view Felicia’s work, and his derogatory remarks about shady gallery dealings prompt Lisa to tell Eddie that living in such an atmosphere could permanently stunt an artist’s development; if Felicia is subjected to this indefinitely, it’s not even worth Lisa’s while to take her on as a client. Felicia finally decides she can’t be torn apart any longer and must accede to Charles’s demands. She tells Eddie her career is over and she won’t paint any more, breaks down in his arms, crying bitterly, then pulls away, unwilling to acknowledge that her feelings for him are deeper than she dare face. Charles is delighted when she prepares to dispose of her art supplies, insisting everything will be fine once she has accepted that this part of her life is over. But she cannot do it. She promises him that he can set the limits and terms, but she must paint. Arlene discovers that her mother is planning to avoid the surgery she needs, and the accompanying medical bills, by leaving Rosehill and moving in with her sister Dorothy out west. Arlene manages to prevent this by calling her aunt and telling her the truth about Carrie’s condition. Dr. Tom Crawford has been footing the costs of Carrie’s presurgery tests, but Arlene knows that Carrie won’t like this. So she tells Carrie that David Hart, the son of Meg’s late husband, the former mayor, has heard about their plight and forwarded the money as a gesture of friendship, to be repaid when possible. To convince Carrie that she does indeed have the money, Arlene asks Ray to just lend it to her for a few hours, so she can convince Carrie and then immediately return it. Ray instructs her to get dressed for a night on the town and takes her, out implying that the money will be waiting at the end of the evening. When Ian Russell happens to join them, Arlene doesn’t suspect anything is afoot, but when e Ray suddenly leaves, she becomes furious, realizing what he’s done. But she finds Mr: Russell a distinguished and cultured man, and decides there’s no harm in having a drink. After cocktails and stimulating conversation, Ian suggests that they go to his place, and Arlene agrees. But when they get there, Ian matter of factly suggests that they skip the preliminaries and get on with it. Ian is embarrassed and annoyed to discover that Arlene is not a professional call girl and that Ray didn’t explain to her the purpose of their |meeting. He is apologetic and solicitous, until Arlene, explaining why Ray felt he could pull this on her, mentions her sick mother in need of an operation. Ian starts to laugh at this overworked standard line, and a livid Arlene storms out of his apartment. Thinking it over, Ian decides he’s more intrigued with Arlene than he is annoyed at Ray, and calls Ray for her telephone number. But Arlene is not delighted to hear from him, and he has to use a good deal of soothing charm before she agrees to have dinner with him at one of the better local restaurants.During dinner Ian again apologizes for his mistake, and he gives Arlene a diamond pendant as a token of his gratitude for her forgiving him. Ray arrives to interrupt an otherwise enjoyable evening with a business matter, and quietly reminds Arlene that Ian is his customer and she’s not to cut herself in with him. At home, Arlene examines the pendant and is convinced that it’s genuine. She hides it in her dresser drawer, unable to bring herself to show it to her mother.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy