Jump to content

Scott Hamner Says Y&R Is NOT Doing A Gay Story


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Ok... I tried to get the SOW where Hamner's quotes are, and I can't find it. I saw the Aug. 25 issue, it has JT and snoreboria on the cover. Which issue is this interview in? I need to see the magazine for myself so I can make a judgement as to whether these people are really jerking us around, or people who hate the show right now are reading things into quotes that aren't there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sigh. This show. Is a hot tranny mess that has managed to outstrip the dysfunction on these here Y&R threads. Congratulations, everybody.

I swear, I don't think I have even seen GH's IIC backtrack so fast and so horribly. They were always the "gold standard" in Daytime as far as this sort of manipulation, spin and hack writing was concerned. But this makes Lucas's blink-and-you'll-miss-it coming-out and subsequent removal from the canvas appear positively Oscar-worthy (in fact, I think that GH coming-out scene won some national GLBT association award for daytime or summink. LOL. Money talks?).

At first I wondered what all the fuss was about, given that it was obvious that NuAdam=Da EVUL and he was never going to be seen carving "Adam *hearts* Rafe" on the front lawn oak. However, Vee's post about "hot" Chris Engen and Yani Gellman bringing in the "ovulating" fangurls made me realise -- yeah, a CE/YG kiss would have been totally hot to see. Y&R probably would have "gone there" if CE had kept shtum.

MAB and HSx2 need to go. But I am worried that if they are replaced, EVERYBODY on staff will be replaced. The way Lynn Marie Troll cleaned house once she became EP. I'm talking the valued Natalie Minardi Slaters, the Beth Millsteins, Tom Casiellos, Noel Maxims, all those guys who break it down and sweat it out to try and produce something viable to air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They are here now. How are they contributing to making this show better?

Obviously, this kind of showed they aren't really needed.

Or, better, we need to set a criterion on who stays and who goes. This gargantuan, Byzantine writing team is a beast from Hell in itself. It doesn't work. It sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

A.) Noel Maxam sold out ages ago when he opted to stay with Days instead of leaving when his mentor, Ed Scott left. He doesn't have anything to do with Y&R now.

B.) And we don't know that for SURE. A strong EP/writer will always keep the team players and the stronger links as they forge ahead. And I'm not impressed with the cliche, day-to-day dialogue of Y&R anyway.

It could get worse than what we have, but I'm willing to take the chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My bad. I knew I'd been seeing his directing credited somewhere on Daytime.

And I'm not Bellcurve but based on Millstein's interim Days work (and her contribution to Sunset Beach -- she made the final week's episodes stand out), I liked the coherency and clarity she gave to the show. And the balance. JER, God rest his soul, had written Days into an almightly tangle by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What you say is clearly true. The show is, now, circling the drain.

But even in that, many of us find much of merit in individual episodes, performances, stories, scenes. I realize this does not make for a good show, but I'm saying the bones of Y&R, cast and crew, still are decent.

I would very much hope that if there were regime change, the new leaders would use the approach that MAB herself did...don't throw everyone away...evaluate what is working on a person-by-person basis.

That said, some of MAB's choices confused me. Like, why did she so quickly ditch Thom Racina?

If I accept your premise that the writing team is Byzantine (and I sort of do...because SOMETHING IS NOT WORKING....all those people, but none of them seems sufficiently empowered to stop the sh!t from continuing to flow from uphill) and huge, I would hope that under regime change the new people would "cherry pick" the best of the current bunch, and not just replace them all.

That said, I'm very disappointed in Natalie Minardi Slater. She was present when MAB/JG forgot TGVN's two previous vasectomies. That is appalling. How could she not have spoken up and prevented that travesty?? It really says terrible things about the power dynamics among the writers on that show...that they are either afraid to speak up...or that if they speak up they are ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The crème of Y&R's writing staff refused to work for Lynn Latham first and then for Maria. Turns out: they did the right thing. Nothing on this team works (for me). I wouldn't keep a single person. Not a single one.

I want to know that, too.

OK, here's the thing: forget history. The constant clamoring for history and historic references and obscure characters who someone remembered from year 1974 will do nothing for this show. You only believe it would, but it wouldn't. The dictatorship and unrelenting exercising of the power this history has ruined all these shows. They are history's hostages.

Whereas other TV subgroups, like primetime, evolved, this one has deteriorated and instead of turning into a butterfly or a frog it turned back into a larva or frogspawn.

It only brings them doom because people fear it, it looms above them like an ancient malefic prophecy. Turns out: the curse fulfills itself. Or like a cloud of poisonous gas which ends up killing everyone eventually.

I'd rather see natural, flowing, realistic, appropriate dialogue than this travesty of writing I'm seeing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I could agree with you here...except for the vasectomy.

Let's say there is a story where a character loses a leg. Then, suddenly, he appears with two legs. (Oops! DOOL did that!). It damages the story to suddenly "forget" the lost leg.

Forgetting "history" in some broad sense could work (you know I differ somewhat on that, but could agree). But forgetting that a character lost an organ (or procreational ability) is quite different, don' t you think?

At the very least, in choosing to reverse TGVN's infertility, it would not at ALL have hurt anything to throw in one or two sentences right at the time of Sabrina's pregnancy, in which Victor said "I'm so glad I had my vasectomy reversed when I was out of town last year".

Same on DOOL. Couldn't Phillip just have said, "Yes, this new prosthesis is amazingly lifelike!". (LOL).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • RIP Wayne Lewis.

      Please register in order to view this content

      (he sings near the end of the episode) https://deadline.com/2025/06/wayne-lewis-dead-atlantic-starr-founder-singer-1236426870/
    • Dallas peaked early, IMO. Maybe not a fair statement as I’m still making my way through the first half of its run, but I think it’s hard to argue to point that S3 into S4 was its high point. Back to Knots. Wrapping up “And Never Brought to Mind.” Greg’s introduction kinda took me by surprise. I low-key dreaded his arrival bc I know he very quickly gets to the center of the show, but even though they wasted no time connecting him with Mac, Abby, Gary, and Karen, it still feels like a gradual intro. The juxtaposition of the ending of the Chip story with the heating up Abby’s plotting is quite symbolic of the changes the show was going through. I absolutely cannot imagine Kenny and Ginger having any part in any of this. Yall, the Gary/Val piano theme that they pull out from time to time is my FAVORITE. I find myself humming it constantly.
    • Bloodshed is inevitable now. It’s another reason I’m glad Black people aren’t getting involved in these protests. As awful as this is, I keep reminding myself that 54 percent of Latino men voted for Trump. These people were put in harm’s way by members of their own communities and sometimes even members of their own families. Too many people decided to touch the stove.
    • Maybe I'm still in denial, but nothing about Neighbours' ongoing social media output gives the vibe of a show that's ending. In today's 'Roundup' video, Alan Fletcher referenced that production finishes in five weeks, but in all the show's posts the cast are as jovial and lighthearted as ever. Remarkably so for people who are about to lose their jobs.    Perhaps they're just putting a brave face on things, and I know they approached the previous axing with a positive attitude. Maybe putting an upbeat face on things is a collective way of showing potential backers that there's still life in the show? Or is it possible that they already know the show has been saved, and we'll get an announcement next month when filming wraps and the show 'rests'?   Does any of that make sense?!
    • A very good week for male eye candy on GH. New Michael is beautiful, Curtis's arms looked great in that polo shirt, Cody looks even more handsome with his new haircut AND we got Marco in swim shorts rocking his lovely bod and chest fur. 

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Yeah when Jamey Giddens did breakdowns for DAYS, he would sometimes state in tweets that specific things were his idea that he had pitched to Ron.
    • I don't, since they've clearly incorporated them into Tomas' storyline, and I happen to like his tattoos, but his jackets not fitting doesn't mean they're trying to cover his tattoos. The clothing overall isn't the issue; it's the fit. And I expect(ed) more from Jeresa Featherstone and her team. Very disappointed. He's the only male, overall, whose costume irritates me.
    • "And OMG, watching the scenes of Roger's return in comparison...the quality in the writing really nosedived. The stupid mask." Very much agreed.  Having Roger hide behind a mask for weeks/months, with it culminating with him swinging in on a vine at Blake/Phillip's wedding....geez.  So juvenile. IMO, Guiding Light never did a good job reintroducing major characters, either from the dead or elsewhere.  Masked balls = awful.  Amish = awful. When Reva was brought back from the dead, she should've just showed up in Springfield as Reva, and informed everyone that she had been gone for years because she felt like it.  She had a four-year fling with some dude who ended up dumping her due to disloyalty. Josh would be pissed and declare that their love is not *always* but *sometimes* and he'd act accordingly.  Her kids would hate her.   
    • Agreed. The Emmys next year are gonna be a pretty tough competition and I hope we get a Days sweep lol  Not only does Deidre deserve a nomination for these last few weeks, but I also think Paul Telfer, Raven Bowens, Carson Boatman, Dan Feuerriegel and Alison Sweeney have good chances as well.
    • It’s not about a lack of faith and trust in MVJ, it’s about a a lack of faith and trust in Ron Carlivati, who I think can be very sneaky and manipulative when he wants to be.  And, all that “He’s just a breakdown writer” talk never changed my mind about anything, because at Days, it was “just a breakdown writer” that gave us some of the worst episodes I’ve ever seen. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy