Jump to content

AMC: The Moving/Not Moving Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 672
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

If Ray MacDonnell wanted to, couldn't he stay on contract and just commute to LA when he was needed? It's not like they show him 3x a week. But I guess ABC was looking to push him out anyways. Or maybe Ray did want to retire and saw this as an opportunity to vacate his role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I've been travelling the last little while and missed a lot of this--but one thign confuses me about the list. James Mitchell has retired--but he's living in California? (Odd because he spent mostof his life in NYC except when filming some movies and musicals--he was one of the top Broadway and American Ballet dancersin New York for eons). I do hope we get at least a good exit/tribute episode to him sometime...

Likewise ifRay is retiring I hope we get a proper sendoff. I'm a bti concerned this move happens just when they should be fosucing on the 40th anniversary--i guess that'll film in NYC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There was a blurb back in the winter about Palmer not being seen because James Mitchell opted to spend his winters at his southern California home. There was no actual statement that he had actually "retired," as there seems to be with Ray.

Anything regarding the 40th Anniversary would have to be taped in New York. They go on break December 11, and they're about a month ahead as it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But, still, as it is during the 5 day schedule, that doesn't mean she'll be used all 4 days. It just means the production as a whole will be taping 4 days a week. That's why I'm saying it's being made a little more confusing than it needs to be by breaking it down to "ooh! When will she tape? When will she not tape?! Will she be taping all 4?! OMG! THE MIND BOGGLES!" It just all depends on her story and what episodes she's in. If it's heavy, she'll probably tape 4 days. If it's light, or if they're ahead, she'll probably tape one or none that week. Bottom line, it just means that if it's Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday or Thursday, she should probably expect to be at work one of those days and not plan to meet her daughter for drinks at the Rainbow Room 7:00 that evening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OH MY GOD. The thing about Ray MacDonell being paid ONE MILLION DOLLARS a year (and being the second highest paid actor, to boot) is RIDICULOUS, even for NB. My god, who believes the utter sh.t that spews from his column? RM, as much as I love him, has never been an AMC superstar. He has never been elevated above strong supporting character. There is no way that he could've made that kind of money in the first place, and if he did, there is no way he would have maintained that salary over the last decade or so, especially when Frons came in. What a load of horse sh.t I officially declare NB to have the WORST column on the internet. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • @Toups Tyler Topits listed in alpha order with the breakdown writers 5/12 Monday episode. O'Connor still listed as both breakdown and script writer. Kreizman wrote today's script.
    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy