Jump to content

June 22-26, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I agree the way the three ABC soaps switch places week to week means nothing at all they are all within the same range and they all suck. At this point what would firing Frons accomplish and he is doing his thing over at soapnet which I am sure the network cares more for at this juncture. I don't even think Disney cares enough about ABCD to have a thought on it and Frons and Co. are just doing what everyone else is doing not one independent creative thought among any of the soaps watching one is like watching all of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 227
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

They won't open it up internationally because -- even if a show doesn't air in your country -- they don't want to damage current or future broadcast sales.

Streaming internationally is seldom profitable. Say, for example, Ragu wanted to sell tomato sauce as a streaming ad. Ragu is not available internationally. So the ads are useless elsewhere.

Even when you go with an international brand, like Diet Coke, it is not the same in other countries. Logos, packaging, even the name (e.g., it is "Coca Cola Light" it Germany).

That's why AgnesNixon.com is smart, at least in principle. They are digitizing the product, and then selling streaming rights (I guess, as an add-on to broadcast rights--not as standalone rights). So, if that formula works, the show should begin to have wider international distribution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I realize it comes down to money, but at some point it will have to be realized that the old rules don't apply anymore. If it's a matter of partnership with a station within the second country than do it. It can only benefit the originator in the long run. There are too many ways around the rules now as far as YT or private email or whatever. The borders are more of an inconvenience than a deterrent. They would be smarter to be at the head of that curve rather than running to catch up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think replacing Frons would help. He's not just doing what everyone else is doing. He has a very unique vision which shuts out anyone who is not a man who happens to have the attention span of Al Bundy.

GH has had significantly more money and time spent on its behalf than OLTL, so for the show to not be ahead, to actually be below, that should be a wakeup call to someone at that network.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to be rude or anything, but I find it hilarious how some people on this board speak so matter-of-factly, as if they have an inside view into the goings on at a particular network.

Now do you know that ATWT is "toast in 2010"? Probably because that is what you have read in the entertainment magazines, just like everyone else. While rumors that GL would be canceled have been swirling for years, did anyone here get a heads up that it would actually occur on April 1, 2009? Probably not. You found out just like everyone else, by reading about it online.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Not to sound foolish but actually how would replacing him help and you have to add on his other functions besides soaps which he is actually doing fine with. I disagree about Fron and his "unique" vision I see the same thing that is happening on ABCD on other shows, weak females focus more on the man in their lives then themselves or not able to function without a man; favorites being pushed on the viewers and hogging of airtime, etc...

OLTL has the new gay storyline that is bringing interest to it for the time being and wasn't to long ago last in the lineup, I am sure the shows will switch places again and then again. Unfortunately for GH making a show HD doesn't bring viewers just makes it prettier to look at for the ones already watching. If a was a network bigshot I would see all the shows in the same boat not one of them are actually doing any better than the other just switching places on who gets to steer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lol. Sorry for that post about ATWT. I was posting while drinking Long Island Iced Teas.....like 5 of them. (In fact, just now I was reading a bunch of posts I apparently made that night that sounded kinda bitchy. Oh, well).

You're right, I don't know what's going to happen with ATWT. I'm only speculating.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Posting under the influence? None of us have EVER done that before! LOL! I still cringe when I think of posts I made when I got out of the burn clinic. I couldn't go anywhere so the web was my only outlet. I was LOADED on codeine and wine and feeling TOO fine, if you know what I mean!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Is there anything else on ABC Daytime besides The View, which was around years before he took over?

SoapNet turns a profit but I wonder how long the D-list wannabe reality shows and the bad TV movies from the 90s will hold up before people lose interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Who really knows what the future holds for soaps and it really saddens me that AMC hit an all-time low. Personally, I am enjoying the show very much and it keeps me entertained. Just started watching OLTL on a daily basis and I am enjoying Cristian/Layla, Brody/Jessica, Fish/Kyle and to some extend most of the other stories playing out. I just hope the soaps can remain viable and resurrect themselves some kind of way. But I have to agree with a previous post unfortunately I believe ATWT will be the next to go but that is merely an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I do think she's been pretty wrecked, having tried to kill someone in cold blood, letting her whole family (including the woman pregnant with her great-grandchild) get charged or questioned, and having no remorse, but it doesn't matter as much because Kathy has not existed as a character since Gillian's return anyway.  There are reasons to bring Max back, like Lauren and his not knowing he had a child with Linda, but he is exhausted, with Jake Wood phoning it in years before he left.  I am a little surprised about Zoe because Michelle Ryan said for years she didn't want to return, to the point of even asking the show to recast the role, but I guess this may only be a short stint. I wouldn't be shocked if they kill Zoe off.
    • HAHAHA. Yeah, that's my bad. I misread that line. Sorry about going into "Unnecessary" detail about my username. Anyway, I love the story behind your Username.    reading on my phone...

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Completely agree with you. I think Bonita Brisker has been really good as Sharon. What Anita did was obviously awful, so she doesn't need to reign anything in. We're getting a good look at someone who's struggled in life compared to Anita "We're the Duprees!" Williams.   -- Anita is starting to look foolish for dredging all this up just so she  can get her ass back on stage. Is she so delusional she doesn't realize how she hurt Sharon and Tracy? -- Anita's line to Vernon "How can I expect Sharon to forgive me when I haven't forgiven myself" struck me as really selfish. After all that with Sharon, Anita again made it all about herself. -- Does anyone really believe Anita wants equal billing if the Articulettes reunite?  -- Colby Muhammad continues to be a standout. Her Kat more than holds her own with Leslie. -- The writing was very good for the father/daughter scene between Ted and Eva. It wasn't so good between Ted and Martin in their father/son scene. It didn't play like family to me, especially when Ted referred to "my wife" when talking about Nicole to Martin. -- Overall, a very solid show today.    
    • I honestly do not see the point of Max coming back again. Zoe does not surprise me. I've been waiting for that since Bionic Woman flopped in the US, frankly. I'm not against it vs. some other pointless returns. Some returns work and some don't, some are just there. Like, am I grateful that Kathy is alive? Yes, absolutely. Do I love any of her stories? No. But she's not utterly destroyed, she's just there.
    • I think Frank probably wanted to try for Jonathan with Kate Mansi. I actually can't knock the idea of a Lucky/Kristina affair or flirtation on paper, as a romantic obstacle to LNL2, but not with the characters in the places they are at present or have been over the last few years. It would be a mistake to do right now and would poison the well. I think Jonathan probably made it clear when he came back that he wanted what had been promised to him years ago with Elizabeth, and between his not being one of FV's preferred focal leads and Liz being a grudging afterthought if she's not with one of his OLTL stars, I suspect FV was content to leave them where they are vs. where they should be, which is central on the show. It's like I said a few days ago: A lot of this is how Lulu has always been. But back in the day the issue was that Lulu (and Carly) were deified for it, whereas now it's that Lulu is just used as the heavy because FV has a preexisting favoritism for Setton/BLQ. And that's a waste of a key character and talent, namely Alexa Havins.
    • Melanie Smith was very difficult to replace, but as KMH did last for a long time, she clearly managed to do so. I preferred Melanie, but the main issue with Kelley is I just think she was horribly written for most of the time. Initially the writing wasn't horrible, it's more she was not the right choice, but over time the writing genuinely became awful, and unplayable, with a few exceptions (I think her pairings with Chris and Hal worked and got to take her in some new directions).
    • Coming into June and...   TRASH. Or as I like to say for moments like this...HUNNI, WHAT IS THIS?   Outside of seeing Traci come home...and then...Ashley...not a darn thing is going on. So they are clearing stalling now, aren't they? It really hit me during the Phyllis/Daniel scenes. It was feeling like a B&B scene where two characters have the same repetitive conversation. And I have not seen Phyllis/Daniel scenes in that light lately so yeeeeah NOPE.   I did like the touch of Traci arrived outside of the Abbott mansion door and taking a breath and looking around. Very aftereffects of Martin. And I liked her and Diane having their conversation about Martin. I wished JG had allowed Traci to stay in town to deal with her feelings about Martin so at least we are getting some follow-up on that.    And same with Ashley and her talk with Jack. I will take Eileen Davidson anyway I can get her. Dare I say...will she be around for the Dumas reveal?   Outside of...   Kyle, Claire, and Harrison in a park IS NOT a storyline.   Sharon having to use the phrases (and in text) with Nick dinner as friends IS NOT a storyline.   Giggly Heffa giggly-heffa-ing around town IS NOT a storyline.    With Damian MIA and my love of Eileen Davidson...I might just go on break until the Dumas reveal if this is how we are starting June. 
    • Dragging this quote over from the Texas thread just because it shows a reference to Bay City as a fictional location at least as early as 1981. It doesn't quote Gail Kobe as saying it directly but the point she is making about the Houston setting of Texas does seem to take it for granted that Bay City is not real.
    • It's too bad they couldn't get access to the old music cues from the 80s and 90s, to run with the flashbacks or in the current scenes. That would have added a lot. Imagine if they had played the old Roman and Marlena theme.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy