Jump to content

Y&R: Episodes Discussion for the week June 22


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Yeah when you're grieving over your dead son you really pay attention to a lot of details. If it were me, i'd pay attention to the machine and the fact that he he turned and gave a final breath.

Now the machine could have been on a timer, remote, who knows - but it could have been fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 871
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Enough paternity re-writes, plus BM and PB really look like brothers and play well of each-other. This show really needs to have their characters acting like families again, even if they are dysfunctional families.

MTSRocks, good points. I would love it if Katherine delivered Jill the ultimate hurt by allowing her to think her son was dead when he isn't. She has always been a very vicious bitch who will go to any lengths to hurt Jill. Plus unlike Philip, she does have the kind of wealth and contacts to be able to pull off a scam to this magnitude. That then asks the question if it was her doing bringing Cane to town as a replacement son, when she thought Jill was her daughter, to make up for what she had done. There are some real possibilities here for great drama.

Even if Nina and Paul were boring together, I don't really want to see them engaging in weekly love fests. Considering that they never bother to use history through flahsbacks to establish Nikki and Paul, they might as well pair him with Nina. Although, even if they just added her to the Paul/JT detective firm it could be interesting. They could dig and get to the real story of all the re-writes and maybe this show can start over with a clean slate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's true, but I thought one of MAB's big goals was to undo the odd twists viewers felt were too much. If that was what she wanted, she could have always just exposed Cane as a fraud and not brought Phillip back. I don't mind them bringing Phillip back, but I can't praise her for undoing other rewrites when she's rewriting history herself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like I said, I don't know how it works, and I don't recall how much we saw of Phillip in the operating room. But like Cashton said, no attendants in the room, and did you see the machines used? I know it's a reach, but I want to see how it's all explained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't believe this Billy as Jack's brother, or an Abbott. There's some physical resemblance, but Billy does not care a bit about anyone in his family and I can't see that changing as long as Sheffer is around. At least him being Victor's son would make him more in line with the Newmans, whose personality he resembles more these days, and it might give Jess and Eric some interesting material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

If Jill was all over him, on his body, and poking him, surely any live person would have a reaction, like Phillip. I don't see how he could have faked a death in that hospital room and had people all over his dead body, and not react to that. That's some divine acting.

Yeah, fixed by a bloddy rewrite. Who times a life support machine anyway? :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really hope it wasn't Katherine behind this. However, if not Katherine then maybe Rex was somehow involved too? I'm just speculating y'all.

A lot of viewers thought it was mistake, Bill Bell himself too, to kill off Phillip Chancellor. I think MAB heart is in the right place with this story - in regards to Thom Bierdz, the fans, and the late great William J. Bell. That's why I'm not too critical on her for this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ooooohh Zoe! Now you're on fire too - Kay staging Phillip's death to let Phillip be free from his family and Jill. Then Kay finds out Jill's her daughter which causes irepparable guilt so she tells Phillip to come back - he won't and instead sends in Cane. Cane doesn't know Kay knows...yada yada yada...that could work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

She was on him for all of two minutes or so. It might be divine acting, but I expect that from Y&R, which is why I can see Phillip pulling it off masterfully. Joking aside, it's not that hard to believe that he was playing dead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now who's re-writing - when was Jill "poking" Phillip!? LOL! And yeah - if I'm staging my death I'll be very still no matter what. And again, depending on who's in the know here it could be an elborate machine that beeps! Again, it's a soap and if it's plausible, it's ok to me.

though I still want them to explain Delia's paternity test..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thank you very much for the information!!! All the episodes that person sells are the ones which appear or have appeared in youtube, and some have wrong dates.  Due to that, I guess some people, who have rare and inedite episodes, refuse to upload them in internet, because then, others make money. I hope ABC create a place in the net where we can see all the available episodes they must have, as Retro tv did with the Doctors!!!!
    • Dina was Jack, Ashley and Tracy's mom on Y&R.  Joanna was Lauren Fenmore's mother, played by Susan Seaworth-Hayes.
    • The funeral was not onscreen - only the Brooks returning home after the service. Not aware of any available clips.
    • Very very well said!!! 

      Please register in order to view this content

      I would only add that Sam Ratcliff is frequently named in regards to certain AW comedic turns.  And, we know from Carolyn Culliton (tweet 2024) that Sam & Gary put their heads together & came up with that gorilla.  
    • I knew you would be so excited seeing your girl Brookey as #1!!!! She also WINS as to Frequently Married!!!  
    • Yes, Stacy does this both for early DAYS & early GH. I have written some for her, for DAYS. But just one tiny point & that is that she only deals with DVDs. I realize that is not the point of your posting but it seemed the right thing to clarify. I know that you know that video tapes is past, not present.
    • Hahahha I think sleeping with almost all of your daughters's boyfriends and husbands and getting pregnant... definitely gives Brooke the right to top 1 place. Long live the whore of Beverly hills.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • CurlyQGrl has DVDs of some episodes, that they can sell, but that doesn't matter. What is helpful: they describe the scenes on the tapes, so you can read that as recaps without ordering anything. Doesn't really give storylines, though, which is what you asked for.  Here's the links anyhow. full menu https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/menu.html GH page https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/gh/menu.html GH 1960s https://www.angelfire.com/tv/curlyqgrl/gh/eps/gheps1960s.htm
    • I would argue that Another World never played "everything" for laughs. Even when there were comedic scenes in some storylines there were other storylines that were not intended as comedy.  You give 1988 as the end point, and Mary was on the canvas from August 1986 to February 1989, so she must have overlapped with the despised laughs you are referring to at least half of the time she was there. I honestly can't recall any real comedy that Mary would have been part of. I don't think she was lighthearted about choosing between two husbands, MJ's prostitution, Kathleen's death, or even her son Scott dating her daughter Cheryl.  I would have said that the amount of comedy depended on the head writer and there was more comedy under Richard Culliton and Gary Tomlin in 1984 than subsequent headwriters. I guess there was an outbreak of more comedy when Cecile kidnapped Cass from his wedding in 1986, but in general the Sin Stalker wasn't presented as funny, Mitch's return wasn't funny, John's arrival wasn't funny, Reginald wasn't funny. The tone was serious even if the plots verged on the ludicrous. And maybe that's what you mean -- but I would make a distinction between intentional comedy and storylines I can't take seriously for other reasons. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy