Jump to content

Was Chris Engen Right about Y&R Plot


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Sara Bibel's latest blog entry is a must read, particularly the paragraph about the latest Ashley haunting developments (miscarriage etc).

She rips the plot a new one. I love Y&R and it is the wonderful entertainment. But it has become purely plot driven over the last six months, moving at warp speed with a great deal of outlandish and illogical turns. And it's not just with Adam's plot. The show overall has felt more James Reilley/Passions than an updated, respectful, 21st Century Bill Bell show. It wouldn't be so alarming if they took outlandish liberties with one main plot and tried to stick to the Bell basics on others. But every plot is the same: Crazy Kevin, Crazy Adam, Crazy Sharon, Crazy MaryJane. All the plot drivers just act crazy and the plot moves at warp speed. Plot turns are dropped in suddenly Daniel and the art heist...WTF is that all about and who cares. Victor giving Patti a new face and bringing the psycho back to GC, but he doesn't know that his sociopath son is haunting his wife? The only plot that is somewhat old school and thoroughly gripping is the nick/phy/sharon/jack/chloe/billy...except they had to make Nick dumb as a stump to keep the ball rolling. I hope they slow it down and realize that they will burn out at this rate. To me, the show feels like Sheffer's first two years at ATWT, gripping, well acted and scripted, but over the top. Anyone else concerned about this hyperpace and some of the stupid developments (can we say stupid...the tommy lasorda call in with kevin and amber...that was painful).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

It's weird. I am enthralled, addicted and enjoying the show -- but also very concerned in equal measure.

GH used to go through these emotional, crazy highs. The subsequent fallback (or downers) became that much deeper. As Bibel said, it burned itself out. I don't want Y&R to go the same way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

While Bibel's columns are often crap, I agree with her on this story. It requires a tremendous amount of suspension of disbelief to get through this story.

The whole tone of the show has shifted to one dark and dreary mess. Too many psycho villains, mental breakdowns, and dark plots going on at once. There is nothing substantial on the show to balance this dark tone out, and it's annoying me.

MAB, Sheffer, and Hamner just do not work well as a team, IMO. They tend to highlight each other's weaknesses, hence the reliance on plot-driven darkness over the past few months.

I think the show needs to refocus its overall tone and perhaps bring in some new writers that can bring more innovative, and diverse storytelling while remaining true to the show's roots.

Not to mention, most characters on this show are overwhelmingly unsympathetic, and whatever sympathy they evoke comes directly from the actors. A good example being that idiot never-ending quad that makes no sense and has harmed each character in it.

Not to mention the writing for women on this show is embarrassing. This show is so misogynistic at the moment, it would make Megan McTavish proud.

Don't get me started on this art storyline. :rolleyes:

Y&R might be better than most other soaps, but that isn't saying much. Daytime is in a horrible, horrible state at the moment.

I feel like the show, in an attempt to by edgy, dark, and contemporary is starting to lose a lot of its heart again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, both Eileen Davidson and Eric Braeden admitted saying "WTF" to Engen. This is the part of a lifetime for a soap actor, I think.

I can't link to the SOD summary I saw elsewhere, but Braeden clames he tried to dissuade Engen from leaving, but is quoted as saying "Listen, I remember Victor feeding rats to people!". Engen was advised to embrace it, but he seemed to want to play "one of those boring guys" per Braeden. Davidson reiterated what she said to Branco yesterday (she knew he was having a hard time, but she also understood leaving a show she was burnt out with since she had done the same. Both had kudos for the professionalism with which Michael Muhney has embraced the challenge. Davidson acknowledged that Muhney was going to bring a different take to the character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have develeoped the same concern as well. I had steady patience during the begining of Sharon's 'psychosis' perspective but by the time it got Nick to where it has him now I'm like WTF. He's too dumbed down (even though Nick was never the brightest star), and all involved is too much of a mess. There are lines but at this point it is no longer about developing individual characters within it is about keeping them at a stanstill to prolong the plot-point until the next "shocking" turn. It is too plot driven again. I actually enjoyed it 2 to 4 months ago or more 2 to 8 months but there has been a consistent decrease in my appreciation for the writing style and approach. This story between Ashley and Adam have too many holes in it, it is very dark (not necessarily something I mind that much, but many others do) which is a risk for the show to begin with, but yet they havn't developed Adam's drive or motivation saying he wants the ultimate rvenge is not enough, the audience needs to see why and should always have a reminder. Ashley falling down the stairs to lose the "phantom" kid was also another unneccessary sensationalistic choice for the story. I don't think the show is getting that these plot choices are not having much positive effect. Crash and Burn is the definite term here. The DNA wrongs, bringing the dead back to life this stuff doesn't intrigue me this makes me think PLOT DRIVEN, PLOT DRIVEN PLOT DRIVEN. It becomes too much the show loses integrity if we can't trust a character to be what we know it to be, I don't mind risks but when consistent things are being undone on this show it becomes overwhelming and the long time viewers start to lose interest over the challenge of what they already know about these classic characters

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, I like dark plots. I like stories with a semi-gothic feel. That's why I was such a Days addict in the 90's. Minus some of the more over-the-top campy stuff, I loved the dark, moody plots. However, I also like traditional soap stories. I like every type of story as long as they're written properly. Do I think that perhaps Y&R isn't the right show for the darker types of stories that are being told right now? Maybe. That's a very real possibility. I also understand why some people are scared that the show is "going down a slippery slope of no return." Much like Days of Our Lives, the long-term effects might not be worth the short-term bells and whistles. However, I would be lying if I said that I wasn't enjoying the hell out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm just enjoying the story for what it is. If it ends up good, great. If it ends up like [!@#$%^&*], well then I'm used to it, LoL. However, I'm not going to psychoanalyze this plot, when right now, it's keeping me entertained.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't mind the dark plots... as long as they don't step over the line with them, and with Sheffer around, I have reason to worry. Things are a bit "too" chaotic IMO, it's good, and very entertaining, but I also think MAB needs to SLOW HER ROLL, or I fear she'll crash and burn. The chipmunk pretty much DID step over the line for me.. BUT just barely. If they ever went into that Marlena posessed by the devil crapola, there would be HELL TO PAY with the fans. I don't think MAB is stupid enough to let something THAT outlandish happen, we can HOPE. There are alot of things I'm REALLY looking forward to, and the show is great right now. But I would have NOT done the art SL, and had a lighter SL take it's place. So many things are going down right now it tends to make my head spin... but again, I LOVE the show right now. To answer the question about Engen.... after seeing this subject matter, I DO understand why someone with a weak constitution wouldn't be able to handle such material... let's remember, Braeden is a HARD ASS.. he can really handle stuff. I'm just offended that they gay kiss was the precipitating factor, and not throwing the fetus into the fireplace (Unless Ashley is still carrying it)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It says a lot that EB tried to dissuade Engen from leaving. It's too bad Engen didn't listen. He could have played the good boring guy once he was rehabilitated..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Engen is just plain dumb. I think even ED said anyone would kill for a role like his right now. Memo to Engen....It's not real...it's a soap. You are just playing evil :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I slowly came to realize this the moment when the show's two leading stories, Kevin and Sharon's going insane, seemed to get derailed a bit and both ended in one single episode.

Now, while entertaining, the show seems to be on a downward spiral of sorts. I'm kind of disappointed that M.J. is you know who, it doesn't really make sense to me.

I don't mind dark plots, but there is such a thing called overload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Please register in order to view this content

    • As always, really interesting to get your impressions! I was only watching sporadically during this period (whereas I was transfixed during the Marian storyline), but if I remember correctly 1996 was a pretty rough transitional year. It came at a period where P&G was playing musical chairs with its executive producers--ATWT was hit especially hard by this. The current executive producer, Michael Laibson, is out in November 1996, replaced by Paul Rauch, who stays for nearly 6 years. While Rauch has a few really bad ideas that cause long-term damage to the show, those don't really kick in until 1999, and his first couple of years are very strong. So once you get to 1997, you should see the show rebound significantly. 
    • Haha love a little drunk posting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I’m up to April 01, 1996. I think I’m starting to understand what many have said.. things are different. I miss the community vibe of Springfield, when you had people working at the hectic newspaper, the choatic diner, the rich were coming in for coffee, or the TV network was abuzz about the latest scandal. Things have become a little more tunneled into their own storylines. Right now, for me anyway, there isn’t a strong desire to see what happens next, ever since the Brent/Marian story ended. It was a darker, more suspenseful storyline that really got me intrigued and waiting to see what happens next, while everything else was just a nice view of midwestern families living their dramatic lives. And I love that too, when the characters and storytelling is strong, but right now, some things are a little stale. In these last 5 weeks, we had two bigger events: Nick and Susan’s wedding:  it was sweet, but I really found it weird they played music over their vows instead of being able to hear them. Then, they leave town immediately after and for good? We really didn’t get a ton of time with them - one minute Susan is in a hospital bed, post-coma, celebrating the new year, and now she’s married and gone. I’m having a hard time with the revolving door of characters since my early ’95 watch. This year we’ve lost so many characters, gained so many characters, and to what end? Henry’s funeral:  this was so sad, considering the real actor passed. I’m curious what other fans thought about the funeral. Granted, when an actor passes, you don’t have much time to plan ahead, so you need to insert it into whatever storylines are happening at the time.  But sadly, this funeral happened when everyone was hating each other. Vanessa was upset with Matt because the Amanda secret came out and he kept it from her. Quint showed up, with his very young affair no less, which made both Nola and J upset. Amanda was there which upset both Blake and Ross. Roger insisted he give a speech which upset everyone. Vanessa was mad at Quint for bringing his young girlfriend, and then Dinah was so upset about her grandfather, which was emotional, but everyone is currently at odds with Dinah. The flashbacks were effective, and the most emotional scene was Vanessa’s breakdown when reading Henry’s letter to her.  Otherwise, it was a pretty hateful funeral, which felt icky. Otherwise, my quick pros and cons currently happening… Pros: Alex and Hawk are great and funny. He gets under her skin and it’s hilarious to watch her react, but she needs him. They were in LA trying to get dirt on Amanda’s former life and Hawk was living it up with young gorgeous women and all the spending money at his disposal.  Generally, the Amanda and her secret storyline is interesting and I really like the actress. Alex vs. Amanda is entertaining. Tina came onto the scene around the time Nadine died, but she’s been given a backstory which is interesting to me now. She’s a prostitute, who means well, and is trying to take care of her daughter, Dahlia. She grew up with Frank, who has a soft spot for her. Marcus, in a new storyline he desperately needed away from Dinah and his dad, has taken a strong liking to Dahlia. She sings well and he plays saxophone well, so their music is endearing. Sadly, Tina got involved in a robbery gone-bad, where they held up a Spaulding board of directors meeting. She flees, but Frank catches her outside and is forced to arrest her, while Cleary (she’s back!) arrests the main bad guy involved and saves the Spaulding family. I’m curious to see where this one goes, but curious, was Tina actually on the show before this or is she a brand new character? Cons: The Dinah/Hart/Roger storyline is pretty stale now. I need something new. Lucy and Alan-Michael are barely on since Brent left, which is sad. You spend an entire year on a storyline that builds their relationship, brings strife and wedges, and now that they’re finally able to be together in love with no obstacles, you never show them? I want to see them happy! Oh and Lucy and Bridget/David haven't had a scene since Marian tried to get 'a room at the boarding house, which is weird because we haven't seen Bridget react to Lucy being alive. I don't even know if Lucy even lives at the boarding house or with AM, but it's sad pretending like Lucy/Bridget/David were never close friends. Reva/Josh, which is hogging airtime, is a serious whiplash. One week Josh loves her, she hates him; the next week, she loves him, he hates her. He’s always lying to Annie, but now he’s marrying her again, the second wedding in 4 months. I’m also very tired of Marah, her angst over everything, and their overwhelming concern over her. As much as I don’t like Buzz, it is funny watching Reva work at the diner, but I’ll never side with Alan so watching him have feelings about Reva/Buzz or Reva/Josh does nothing for me. Finally, the other small B storylines are only on like once a week which isn’t enough:  Gilly/Griffin/Viviane, Michelle/J, Blake/Ross/Rick, Rick/Abby, Holly/Fletcher and the baby. Something that just popped up out of the blue is David Grant leaving Springfield out of nowhere. He professed his love to Bridget, who turned him down, so he decides to leave when Griffin gives him a job opportunity. Sadly, another character written out for many new characters being introduced. Makes me wonder who is making these calls - the producers, the network, the writers, the fans?
    • OH. The AMC/OLTL Crossover with helicopter, down in the woods, 2 very pregnant, both give birth, only one baby lives. We are on the same page!!!
    • Backtracking because BTG has been distracting me from keeping up with GH. Why is Carly always involved with a paternity lie? Lulu is Dante's (wife? if Im correct) so she has the right to tell him about his son. If anything, she's in a better place to reveal paternity drama than Robin was. As for Robin...I'm conflicted about whether it was HER place to tell AJ he was Michael's dad. Being with a man who's pretending to be someone else's baby daddy is wild. Dante was snoring blaming everyone  but Rocco, however he was right about Jason. A convo isn't enough, neither is trying to be your son's friend. Adolescents need a disciplinarian. At least Lulu made Rocco and Danny scrub the house. 
    • May 2025: Stephanie Sloane interviews Kirsten Storms about all of Maxie's romances in the past 20 years: https://www.swooon.com/gallery/general-hospital-maxie-romances-spinelli-johnny-nathan-kirsten-storms/
    • I saw a new BTG promo during Watson tonight (Sunday May 11).   I don't remember what I saw (and I wouldn't say here on the nonspoiler thread anyhow). I know only that it was different from the "next on BTG" preview at the end of Friday's episode. If anyone catches the new promo, please post it on the spoiler thread.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy