Jump to content

Another World Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Members

 

Because I am so totally hopeless with anything to do with technology, I have foolishly gone far too long without transferring all my ancient videotapes and audiotapes to modern formats. Fortunately, by my sending stuff to Eddie Drueding and @billbauer, those fine gentlemen have done the "heavy lifting" and been good enough to share many of my vintage soap episodes on-line with other fans. A huge chunk of the credit goes to them.

 

And yes: contrary to what a petulant Harding Lemay contended, Jacqueline Courtney was great on AW.

 

 

It's my pleasure, although the majority of the credit must go to Eddie Drueding, who agreed to digitize my tape and then share it on his excellent AW page! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 13.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

 

 

Yes, and Virginia Dwyer was also great as the show's matriarch, Mary Matthews.  Lemay minimized her role and tried to turn Mary into a meddling shrew, before finally killing her off.  Although Lemay was a good writer, he did not understand soap opera genre well enough to recognize the importance of the matriarch to a soap opera's core-family.   If Lemay wanted to fire an actor for bad acting, he should have fired Hugh Marlowe (Jim Matthews), and replaced him with a better actor.  Marlowe stuttered and stammered, huffed and puffed through his dialogue every time he was on screen.  He phoned-in every performance, and probably didn't look at the script until five-minutes before the camera rolled.   Neither Courtney nor Dwyer deserved to be fired.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I agree: Dwyer was the matriarch of the show and an original cast member; killing off Mary Matthews was a huge mistake and forever damaged the core and structure of the show. I have a feeling Hugh Marlowe was starting to have memory problems in the mid-1970s. He was fine when he first began on AW, but as time passed, he started flubbing his lines more and more, looking lost in the middle of scenes, and generally giving weak performances. He allegedly blamed Virginia Dwyer for his on-set problems (or so Lemay claims), but to viewers it was clear that something was going on with Marlowe himself.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Harding Lemay began to create a family for Peggy, just shortly before Micki Grant left the show.  Peggy's mother. Gloria and sister, Linda, plus Linda's boyfriend Zach Richards joined the show.  Was Grant's exit unexpected? Seems strange to create a family for a character on the way out.  Soon after Grant left, Gloria stopped appearing.  Zach continued to appear for a few years, but Linda was by far the longest running member of the family.  Linda had only one minimal storyline of her own early in her time at the show, when she started dating Zach, who had been recently released from prison and her mother didn't approve.  After that, Linda appeared mostly as a nurse at the hospital and a close confident of Alice Frame.  Supposedly Linda was still appearing occasionally when Quinn Harding joined the cast, but the two had no scenes together.  I am not sure that bit of information is correct.  Perhaps there is a way to check the dates to confirm.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

It would be interesting to know if Linda had any scenes with the recently returned Alice Frame in 1981, since they had been so close in the 1970s.  But the writers were different, and seemed to know little about Alice and Steve's real history.  They made-up a lot of history that never really happened on the show, and they ignored a lot of history that did happen on screen.  No research and little continuity, even though only a few years had passed.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

That's why the revisited Steve and Alice story bombed. (To be fair, even though the writing was weak, David Canary was a fine actor, and had he been paired with Jacquie Courtney, there might have been some sparks there. But with bad writing, a "new" Steve, a tepid Alice, and careless misuse of history, it was all doomed to fail.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Good points.  Everyone blames the failure on the casting of Steve and Alice.  But I firmly believe it was the writing that killed their returns.  And to a lesser degree, the directing.  No one will ever convince me that David Canary wasn't capable of playing Steve Frame.  But Canary obviously knew nothing about the character, his history, or his personality.  Canary played Steve as loud and jolly, when Steve had always been quiet and sullen,. And because he didn't understand Steve's history, Canary played the role with absolutely no subtext -- which had been George Reinholt's gift.  With a little direction, Canary could have played Steve much more believably.  I also believe Linda Borgeson was acceptable as Alice.  She was no Jacquie Courtney, but had the writing been better, and Canary's Steve been more convincing, Borgeson could have been successful.  At least she could cry convincingly, which Susan Harney could not do.    

Edited by Neil Johnson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just think David Canary is a fundamentally different type than a George Reinholt. I don't get it. But I didn't see Canary's days in TV westerns; maybe he could do it. The only person who could've done it cold was David Selby, but he was still big in primetime in the 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   1 member




  • Recent Posts

    • If I'm being 

      Please register in order to view this content

       about it I think Jan is a fine supporting part for a solid daytime vet (probably someone from the P&G soaps), as opposed to someone from the production location who is clearly cheaper. Which seems to govern some casting. I get the rationale, but I would start going through the ATWT/GL, etc. rolodex myself.
    • I dont mind Jan. She's good in the minor capacity she is used. 
    • tbqh I don't care about Jan, I don't care about Ashley and I think Jon Lindstrom as Joey is an acquired taste. Jon is a great actor but certain things are in his zone and then some are not. Some days I find Joey credible and compelling, but the stuff with him hanging around the Golden Corral, grumbling about Doug and bitching at Randy is not amazing. If he had material on par with what MVJ wrote for Ryan/Kevin on GH back in the day it'd be a different story. I do think he has real chemistry with Vanessa, which is in large part due to MVJ clearly molding that character (and hiring an appropriate actor) in the Lucy Coe vein when she reinvented Lucy in the '90s as well. But I am not here to spend 6+ months watching Jon glower a lot (which is what he's doing half the time to carry weak story) and make more vague dire pronouncements while Jen Jacob gets flustered and weepy over "Daddy" or whatever would come of that storyline. Putting them together sounds like a recipe for doom to me. But I may be in the minority on that.
    • I know this will never happen. But... Halle Berry as Dani Dupree(BTG). She would rock this role, it's in her wheelhouse.
    • When I see how bad the Ashley/Derek scenes are, I know there must be a larger purpose and Joey being her father is the thing that makes the most sense.  My take on it is that Ashley knows Joey is her father but doesn't know Joey. Maybe he was there when she was a child or just not around at all but I believe Jan when she says she didn't lie to her daughter about who her father was. Maybe she left him when she discovered his dangerous lifestyle.  I do think they could really jump start the character of Ashley if they hurry and do this. Jan is a great character and her scenes with Ashley have been helpful. This would further integrate Ashley into the canvas and give her something dramatic to do. With her working at the hospital along with Doug, it could lead to complications if she learns Doug is involved with her father. I just need is sooner rather than later because Derek is tanking her character. I need a distraction.
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • The stories are awful. I'm not enjoying any of them. All I'm left with is Sally in a plastic dress.
    • Please register in order to view this content

    • lol. But...SAME. in Mona's 'Good' voice.
    • I loved your rambling because you had some good thoughts.  Stopped watching Y&R years ago so can't comment on that, as far as Lame is concerned. No cares in the world. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy