Jump to content

April 20-24, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I don't really see any other conclusion you can draw. Goodness knows it fills me with a special kind of satisfaction to take shots at Frons. He's sort of Carrie Prejean to my Perez Hilton. But aside from my deep, deep (did I mention DEEP?) personal enmity toward the man, I simply don't understand how somebody who has overseen this level of financial and audience decline can keep his job. At this point I feel like the only way to get rid of him is to have Obama fire him like he did GM's Rick Waggoner.

ETA: I just read Bibel's post. I'm not really on board with it because she's asking Frons to be the solution when he's the problem. The person she's asking to run the network isn't a changed Frons, it's a different person altogether. It's like the old 12-step phrase: Your best thinking got you here. But it was a good vent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I disagree and also agree with you here.

Disagree:

Bob Guza is not a decent writer. Wendy Riche and Jill Farren Phelps are both strong EP's. Guza and Riche did not get along and that was obvious. When she left and Guza was made head writer again in 2002, it was more, more mob and that's what Frons loves. Guza runs a muck on that set and does whatever he wants. Had there been no Frons and full control to JFP with a strong writing team, GH would be a millions times better.

Agree:

Leaving him to his own designs would definitely be more destructive, but he has like 99.8% control over what we see. He's head writer and consulting producer. Guza and Frons are their own worst enemies. They are the cancer to GH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There is an online belief that widely shared that Phelps has no or little input in GH. Well, I do not believe it. The GH actors talk about consulting with her about stories. They would not waste their time if they felt she was powerless. She may not have as much control as at her previous soaps, but she has some power and is responsible for some of what we see on the screen.

While I am at it, let me also share my very unpopular opinion that while Frons guided by market research insists on specific actors being featured more than others and may toss some stories, it is the headwriters who are primarily responsible for how the stories play out on our screens. They pitch the stories and they write the stories that are approved. It is their responsibility to check the scripts to catch inconsistencies from day to day and with the history of the show or hire someone to do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah I don't buy that JFP has no power for the reason you stated. I've heard actors on the show comment about talking to her about their character and storylines, meetings with she and Guza to discuss long term storyline plans, etc.. She may not have the power she had on previous shows, but I also believe she has more power than the online community believes.

I also am not sure Frons is the entire issue. No I don't agree with his turning all his soaps into couples only focused shows and his infatuation with the younger audience, that's all on him, but I also watch OLTL and AMC and while not perfect, OLTL in particular at least makes an attempt to manufacture stories surrounding their couples and does actually better integrate their vets into the show. I honestly fear that GH would be much worse if Guza was left to his own designs. And there was a day when Guza was actually not a bad writer. I think he's just stale and played out on GH and has been for the last several years.Brian Frons doesn't write teh show does he? Most storylines can be made halfway interesting no matter how ridiculous if given decent writing. Bottom line, fresh blood is needed to restore the creative juices in that show or at a minimum, a co headwriter or story consultant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

But just because actors consult JFP doesn't mean she holds the key to GH. Students consult a guidance counselor in school or an academic advisor in college, but they are not the dean of the college or the President of the University. Frons holds the key to the castle and he can designate who does what and says what.

For instance, it is my opinion that Guza pens what we see. Frons approves it. Jill and Mary O'Leary execute it.

Actor's don't talk to Frons about storyline. Guza probably doesn't want to be bothered. So actor's then direct their questions to JFP. Do I believe she is present at writer's meetings and teleconferences, etc, YES. Do I believe she gives input? YES. But I do not for one second believe she comes up with the stuff we see. That's Guza. Then Frons approves it and when they are scratching their heads and saying "hmm... maybe we can change this, let's see what Jill thinks" then JFP comes into play.

At the Daytime Emmy's in 1999, GH won for Outstanding Drama Series. Wendey Riche when on to praise JHC in her acceptance speech as she said JHC was what kept their GH family together. She was always there for the cast and crew for help and questions, etc. JHC was not executive producer or head writer, just a supervising producer or something of that nature. Again, she wasn't in charge, but people went to her for stuff. JFP may have the title, but she isn't fully in charge, I don't care what anyone says. Get rid of Guza and Frons and let's see Jill in action.

A lot of corporations have rehired their former CEO's over the years as consultants to basically tell the current CEO's how to run the company without destroying. Again, they aren't in charge, but are looked to for advice. Jill knows her stuff, it would be foolish for her actor's to not go to her for questions and support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I see your point. I know JFP has done some great things in the past, but she's also had some stinkers. I don't think putting her in charge is the answer.

If ABC were serious about wanting positive change for GH, they should fire the lot of them and bring in an EP and HW with a proven track record and no predefined biases, just a love for the genre and show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the path to GH's ruination started ramping up when he returned in 1998. That's when the Quartermaines were fully turned into Jason's foils, when AJ was butchered, when Luke and Laura were split up and Lucky was separated from the family (first with the rape reveal, then JJ's departure, then when Jacob Young appeared, he barely interacted with his parents), when the show was fully surrendered to mob worship. There were so many mob shootouts in glorified slow motion, and over a year spent with Jason as the perfect father to Michael, AJ as the evil father who couldn't hold his own son without Michael bursting into tears, Robin turned into a mob moll, then when Kimberly McCullough chose to leave the show, turned into a bitter pariah who spilled the beans to AJ.

GL was phenomenal as long as Nancy Curlee was around. After she left, GL 1994-mid 1995 (when JFP was pushed to AW) was mostly confusing, half-told stories, most of them hogged by Jill's friends from other soaps. Then at OLTL, she turned the show into a nightmare populated by all her friends. She tried the same at GH for her first 6 months or a year until Guza was dumped on her.

Guza and JFP both seem like consummate show killers to me, as they like to destroy anything they did not create. They have managed to do to GH what many would have never imagined. And Frons either doesn't care or wants the show to die.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree, pair Jill with a brilliant HW like Nancy Curlee, and you'll get fantastic, history-making results. But pair Jill with Margaret DePriest, Megan McTavish, and Bob Guza - and you'll get nothing but a catastrophe.

I've always defended Jill's talent. I think she's a brilliant technical director and producer, but she tends to work best when she's paired with a HW that's the complete opposite of what she stands for, like Curlee, someone to balance her tendencies out and let Jill do what she does best - produce the damn show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

That's the point I was trying to make. When JFP is paired with a strong and stable HW or HW team, her shows are great. The writer's write and Jill produces.

Carl, I agree with you about GH's demise in the late 90s. From my understanding's Guza and Riche did not get along at all and I think that led to a lot of conflict.

I don't think Jill would be great on her own. I think that if she has a strong and stable HW, the show she produces will be great, like GL pre 1994.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Thank goodness someone remembers the hell that GH was in the 1990s under Guza. Bibel is so full it. I wanted to scream when she was pimping Guza.

With a couple exceptions, JFP has been a nightmare as a EP. I'll never forget the nightmare that she brought to OLTL. Those freaking Rappaports, all Jill's friends, the deaths, and the darkness. She helped drive OLTL into the ground. I don't want Phelps or Guza given any more power on the show. GH would be a million times worse. They both need to go or the status quo remain with a talented consultant/co-headwriter brought in.

What I found most interesting about the Curlee interview, she talks about interference from network executives. Yet she was able to put out a quality product at GL. Blaming Frons, the network has been a cop out for online soap fans. If the EP and headwriter have talent and vision with hard work, they should be able to make lemonade from lemons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I read once Jr hands over his approved by Frons outline to

"breakdown (then passed on to "script writers" ) he's done....don't know if its true just I read it online some say he never comes to the set and doesn't watch the show imo that's like a baker not tasting his cake...

I also agree with QUOTE (CarlD2 @ May 1 2009, 02:01 PM)

I think the path to GH's ruination started ramping up when he returned in 1998

That's when it started for me...also the Carly / Carly Michael storyline that never ended with my favs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I find it funny that ATWT is ranked #4 in Total Viewers and it only has one more year on the air. :lol: Yet, shows like OLTL, AMC and GH are safe with no word of cancellation in sight. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy