Jump to content

April 20-24, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I 100% agree with you. ATWT is by far the worst show on the air. Horrible writing, no stories that make any sense, revolving door of beloved characters, and no plot line that lasts more than two episodes in length (if there is a murder on Monday, you'll know who did it by Tuesday, and then there is a good chance it will never be mentioned again). I have been watching since 1987 and I only record to DVR and skim now. I envy the writing at ABC :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I guess not having numbers to ponder does this :).

I confess, I am personally stunned at the DEPTH of the anger at ABC, and at Bibel's column. I'm still trying to process what it all means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think it is just conventional wisdom defending itself. I am not sure giving Guza six months with no intervention is a great idea because he has no taste, but I do agree writers should be allowed to write. I don't even like the concept of focus groups and think ABC should abandon those. But really, you don't want Guza or Pratt and their unbridled genius anywhere on your TV. :lol: :lol: :lol:

They have to be the alltime worst soap writers. Maybe ABC can hire new writers and then give them free reign. Guza should retire though. And this is unpopular so I probably should put this in the other thread, but any soap writer who can't sell Andrea Evans as Tina but writes endlessly for Marty "This actress is so depressing I may commit suicide" Saybrook should think about hanging it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Where are the daily ratings????

That should tell you something right there, when they start the character destruction of Robin, for whatever stupid reason(my guess is Guza wants to do Patrick/Liz for some reason), the ratings started to fall. When Scrubs are together, the ratings seem good.

Sorry, but there are things on GH that do bring in ratings. I don't know if Liason does or not, but Scrubs sure does. I don't think it's a coincidence that the ratings have dropped as much as they have since the desctruction of Scrubs started....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It is THE SHOW, not small elements of it. And even then, nothing happens with out promotion$. And even then, nothing fights the demographic trend that slowly kills them all.

GH, though, is in a special place, because it is currently declining faster than the genre. THAT is danger.

AMC & OLTL...they've actually been gaining/holding stable. From a ratings perspective, like DOOL, they should probably be left to keep doing what they're doing. You know that's how the suits view it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Mark is right. It is promotion that brings in the viewers when soaps have "events." Look at how they widely the promote Guza's sweep stunts. They do not stick to SoapNet or ABC Daytime. The promos are every where on the net, in the mags, and on cable networks. In turn, there is a bump in the ratings which never lasts. Robin and Patrick's wedding barely got a snippet in a SoapNet run promo of multiple stories. Did GH ever run promos about Robert and Anna's return? I do not remember. I do remember seeing ABC promos for Robin and Anna's reunion which is why I knew to tune in to AMC.

In any case, GH's problem is not the 20% of the show with Robin and Patrick, Nikolas and WasEmily, the hospital, and the Qs. The main problem is the 80% of the show devoted to the mob and its ancillary characters.

I do have a lot of anger about how Guza and Phelps have written GH into this mess. The show has good bones, but it rarely lives up to its promise. I have became even more bitter after Night Shift 2 when I saw how a talented writer could tell solid stories with good performances.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OLTL had been holding steady, but they seem to be bleeding now.

There's nothing to promote on GH now, because they save everything for the latest EVENT THAT CHANGES NOTHING. What did the toxic balls story change? They killed bit characters. Now they could have done promos saying, "Carly and Lulu are finally likeable again! Tracy and Edward share good scenes!" and that would have brought in more fans than what they did choose to showcase.

All the stories are just a mess. I still have no idea why they brought Natalia Livingston back and I don't think they do either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yet over the last couple months, there are been tons of promos for Sonny and Claudia's horrible story and now Carly and her pregnancy on SoapNet, ABC Daytime and in the soap mags. Sense the theme? There might have been one promo for Helena's return which was great and should have lasted longer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was surprised at their ratings for the wedding w/Robert's return

can't remember if it was the first or second

but it was 2.0 or something...

I never thought that there would be a Patrick and Elizabeth pairing

anytime Patrick has a POV with a female character eg Olivia he did the same thing...

I saw Elizabeth's involvement in the PPD storyline serving as a POV/friend and also as a contrast to

highlight Robin in the throes of her depression, hitting rock bottom

Elizabeth pretty much explained it in dialog during the intervention...

just a friend to both . All he talked about is his love for Robin

....I like friendships on soaps

Re Helena

Is she gone already? :lol:

Seems like one of their stunt castings

Wonder what they are going to do with Martha Byrne..??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I always find it funny or even almost hillarious that in this day and age that the powers that be have so jaded daytime soap opera fans into believing that it is all about the couples. And as mentioned the soap opera press like Nelson, Daytime Confidential and so many others perpetuate that mentality too.

It is so funny how it always comes down to if Scrubs were together or Liason were togethen then the ratings will go up or you take Zendell apart and ratings will go down.

It all goes to the Luke and Laura and supercouple mentality that the 80's started and the 90's inbread in soap viewers. And soap writers like Sherri Anderson forced and instilled on viewers even going to the press and saying that at the end of the day she needed to know that no matter what at the end of the day she knew that Marlena loved John and it would always be that way.

Folks it is not couples that ever created the sucessful ratings of daytime. Yes the couples were important - they are a key element. But it wasn't the couples - it was the underlying things with the couples and much of that is what is missing today and is much of the reason why the ratings are dropping and continue to drop.

1) For one soaps have lost their identity. They are not true to themselves. Look at Y&R and Days for example of this. Both shows in the last few years lost their ways and began to bottom out. They drifted from what even modern day fans felt they were all about. Sure Hogan Sheffer and Edward Scott brought great technical aspects to Days but they also made Days into something that most fans didn't recognize. What did fans do they ran away from the show in droves. Higley comes on and Tomlin comes on. Days starts resembling it olds self again. Sure it is not as technically great as it was, but it feels like Days again - not the Days I watched in the 70's but it does feel like the Days that is known to most of the modern day fans. What happens it's ratings go up even without big super couples like John/Marlena and Patch/Kayla. And even without couples like Lumi and EJami even being happily together. Their ratings are going up.

Many of the soaps are trying to be just like someone else or something that they aren't. Fans are drifting from them. Even with the best and most popular couples there, if the show doesn't seem like itself fans are not going to watch. Just look at Days and the EJami/Lumi fans who claimed they were the biggest fan bases in daytime. They were front and center on Days during Sheffer's run, but it did nothing for the ratings.

2) The biggest element that is missing from soaps is angst and suffering. Soaps operas have thrived on angst and suffering for years. And not just onscreen but it has thrived on the angst and suffering of it's viewers as well.

Onscreen the heroine and the couple suffer and wait and wait and wait, but at the same time so do the viewers. Today as stated by others, things happen too fast. One day you have a murder and the next it is solved. The soap ends on a cliff hanger and in the next promo or the coming attractions the end of the cliffhanger is given away.

The reason people tuned in by the millions to see the weddings of Luke & Laura on GH and Steve & Betsy on ATWT and Steve & Kayla on Days was because we suffered with them. We waited and we waited. It was a buildup and it became a big event. It wasn't just the couple either.

It was the stories that surronded them, knowing the obstacles they went through to be together, the happy times, the sad times, the romance, the pursuit, - we went through it with them.

We waited on Luke and Laura to be married for 2 years after the rape. It was almost a year before they actually slept together when it was by Laura's choice. Even when they were on the run together, they didn't sleep together. Their first love making was an event.

These romances played out not as the romance but as part of the overall story and canvas of the show. None of these couples were the be all and end all of the show. They had ramifications on other people. For instance every part of Laura's story from day one affected her mother's story, from the point that Laura got involved with older man David Hamilton, to her killing him, to Lesley taking the blame for her, to Rick getting angry at Lesley for doing so, then Rick sleeping with Monica, and so on and on.

They were chain events - no man or couple was an island.

It is in now way about the couples alone. It is not the couples that have really ever caused teh ratings to go up and down. Sure they are a part of it. But without soap opera being about what it is supposed to be about none of it succeeds.

Soap operas have got to get back to a sense of mystery, angst, suffering, a sense of community, and a sense of identity within each show. Without these things soap opera is not soap opera. And it will not survive. It has not chance.

I mentioned in the first part about the shows losing their identity. IN a broader sense daytime soap opera has lost it's identity. Primetime soaps are much closer to what daytime soap opera used to be than daytime is today. And for that reason I enjoy the primetime soaps today a whole lot more than I do the daytime ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exactly! That 80% is what's running this show into the ground. Anymore, whenever I turn on GH and I just see either Sonny or Maxie or Claudia or Spanelli, I just turn the TV off. It's that group with the rest of the character's they are involved with too such as Jax, Carly, Jason, et al, that leave viewers disgruntled and turned off by the show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • But by Dinah and Hart...Hart especially looked as if he could not tie his own shoes!  Ed, Holly, Alan, Alex Henry and Vanessa among others were not able to put Roger down....Dinah???
    • The preaching seems to end before the Barnes settle in late December, 1981. The stuff that felt overly religious (the Davidsons believing a miracle will save Lori rather than a surgeon, Jeff's miraculous recovery from a beam of light) was quickly nixed because it wasn't working. The closest thing that you get to that under the Barnes is when Dennis Fraser, the drunk driver who killed Nora and Scott, turns his life over to god. The born-again redemptions out of nowhere seem to stop fairly early into the Barnes' run. I do think Miriam's transformation was much more delicately done with her turning on her bestie Nancy because Nancy was seducing Charles, Miriam's wealthy father, so Miriam offers to testify for the Davidsons in the trial against Nancy over possession of Nora's house. In turn, Nancy repays the favor by pumping an emotionally distraught Miriam with barbituates while Miriam carries on her affair with low level thug turned political aide Norm Elliott. Miriam is used by everyone into her life and finally lands herself in the hospital becasue she has become so addicted to the pills. At the hospital, it is the friendship and kindness of the Davidsons that brings Miriam to a more peaceful place. The Davidsons ability to forgive is both appealing and, at times, dramatically limiting. In this case, the Davidsons lead Miriam to her new Mama, Ione Redlon. Now, under Vinley, Miriam is determined to reconnect with her son, Frederick, and her ex-husband, Paul.   My bigger issue with the Barnes' writing is that they write the storylines with twist endings that sorta come out of nowhere. I know the resolution to the Kate Carrouthers mystery sorta plays out like that so I am curious to see how I feel about that.  The biggest change throughout the writing teams has been the view of morality. Winsor had many characters who could be viewed purely through the lens of black and white, but others explored the shades of gray (often younger people). The brief head writerless period was much better at embracing an action doesn't make a person and there characters were much more gray or at least evil at a more local level (Nancy, in this period, only flirts with her brother-in-law where as later she is actively providing pills to Miriam to keep her addicted and away from her own father). The Barnes, for the most part, seem to embrace this level of political corruption that seems to permeate throughout the show making it clear that power (as well as money) is the root of evil. Even criminal Vince Cardello is presented as less evil than Charles Carpenter, though Carpenter's murder of a resident of his complex was rewritten to relieve Carpenter of any responsibility in the matter. Vinley's work seems more into exploring the why or delving deeper in general. Babs Farley, the hooker who is looking to reclaim her life, is such an intriguing character. She is given such meaningful monologues regretting her decisions and desperately trying to keep away from the hands of her former pimp, Ron Washington, who hasn't appeared yet. Monk and Fernandez seem to be wrongly accused of Lori's attack and there seems to be hints of racism that the show is looking to address. Marianne confronts Gil about his feelings towards God in relation to their mother's death years earlier.  There does seem to be a layer of misogyny to Vinley's work, but it's early so I'll be curious to see how this plays out. There are a lot of attacks on women (Lori is nearly raped, Babs was beaten, Nancy is on the verge of being blackmailed for sex by Tab, and the Russ / Marianne / Gil scenario has hints of toxic masculinity. It's very early so it'll be neat to see if that is maintained.  Jerry TImm lasts about a year I think (March, 1982 - March, 1983). One of the episodes on TouTube has a comment suggesting that Timm was fired by CBN because he had done something in his past that came to light. It didn't seem to be clear what that was.  I like what I've seen of Timm as Gil. He has such a presence that it covers up some of his weaker acting choices. It's unfortunate that he didn't get to play as much of the Gil - Stacey - Amber triangle as his replacement does.  
    • I believe it was Mark Arnold's family that taped all the shows. It was the same with Ariane Muneker - her mother bought a video recording machine in the 1970s, at a time when that type of technology was really expensive John Wesley Shipp's parents also taped all his shows, and has a complete library of every single episode of every soap JWS has appeared on. Same for Cynthia Watros. When the Soap Actors parents pass away, and there are all these VHS tapes in dozens of boxes, it is shame to waste all that. 
    • Personally, I felt that the deletion of the original music from the girls' slumber party episode, and the axing of REM's Losing My Religion from the ep featuring Brenda and Dylan breaking up, were the most painful. The changes really damaged those episodes. I dropped the DVDs after season two, but I've been told by other viewers who kept going that tunes from all the seasons continued being replaced, and the situation only got worse as the DVD releases progressed. Yes, penny-pinching from those in charge was the principle issue, but I wonder how much better the DVDs would have sold if such poor choices had not been made in the name of cost cutting. On the other hand, when Time-Life put out the Vietnam-war era classic China Beach, they dug deep into their pockets and ended up clearing the rights to a whopping 268 (!!!) of the original tracks. This represented 96% of the total. TPTB said that when they were not given permission to use a few of the remaining pieces, they substituted different singers' versions of the exact same songs, in order to preserve the show's integrity as much as possible. The CB set was expensive as heck, to be sure, but to me it was worth it.
    • Oh I knew it was common (I did not realize Muenker's channel was gone - I'm glad I saved all those videos). I just didn't realize it was the case with the rape episode.  I never really felt like she dominated the show in her second stint either, although I can see where she probably did. I can feel it more in some of her first run, because the show was much different before she came in and suddenly a woman we'd seen for a year was [!@#$%^&*] and marrying an entire family.  In that sense Reva is more like Babe than Erica Kane. One of the more infamous AMC lines was, "Babe is love." You just know HB would have said that line about Reva at some point.
    • I disagree; if this were Chris Clenshaw, then I would be worried. But it's a new producer coming in to clearly create the canvas they want to create, and I'm okay with that. Re-introducing characters to shake things up and possibly take some other ones out of the canvas. It'll be interesting to see the finished product.
    • I am ready for our first full week in what feels like a while! They worked Sweeps month!
    • Beyond the Gates: A The Bold and the Beautiful: F Coronation Street: B Days of Our Lives: B- EastEnders: A+ Emmerdale: A- Hollyoaks: B+ General Hospital: C Neighbours: C+ The Young and the Restless: F For me, Beyond the Gates, EastEnders, and Emmerdale led the pack during Sweeps month, with Coronation Street and Days of Our Lives following. General Hospital and Neighbours sit in the middle with what I'd call a "take it or leave it" kind of Sweeps month, and the Bell soaps bombed (per usual).
    • Actors doing this is pretty common. I used to work for a company that produced a very successful sitcom back in the 70s. Actors who were guest stars on the show would ask to be provided tapes of their episodes. I assume they do it for a variety of reasons, i.e. to create a reel of their best work. I know of some soap actors who have uploaded saved work to YT. One is Ariana Muenker, who played Christine Valere on GL. She was uploading scenes from her many soap roles a few months back. Unfortunately, it looks like either she or YT took the channel down. Sharon Gabet and Mark Arnold help the EON YT channel by providing saved episodes. Along with EON eps, Arnold shared a guest stint he did on GL. Those episodes are really interesting because they involve the introduction of Nola's character, which was tied to the Roger storyline. When he came back after faking his death, he hid out at the boarding house. Nola being a snoop figured out something was fishy with him. She ended up helping the police. Very worth seeking out. I don't think anyone else has those episodes.  Makes you wonder if there's more out there than we know of because actors don't want to be bothered to run a YT channel. Can't blame them because it's a lot of trouble, but if only... I agree. While Lucci definitely used her fame from the show to build her brand and get work outside of AMC, Erica was always part of an ensemble. Yeah, she got a couple of whacky stories (like the "unabortion") but she never took over to the detriment of other actors and stories.
    • It must have been sometime in the early 80's. VI said he first heard about Marj Dusay's talent from CH. Hickland worked with her on Capitol.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy