Jump to content

Y&R/ Maria Bell losing their way?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

As things stand right now... I first wasn't going to reply. At all. Why would I? You've already made up your mind, you know exactly how I'm going to reply, you will say my answer is "typical Sylph"... But... Now I'm having second thoughts: perhaps, and you will interpret this as definitely not, I will reply. When? I don't know. Why don't I reply right away? I think you're expecting a long, drawn out, perhaps even a tiny bit emotional, thorough reply and I have to think how to and whether to do it... So you can stop checking the watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LoL, Vee. Trust me, people will avoid your posts because you are objective, intelligent, and rational.

And yes rover I'm the same MTSRocks. Still holding a grudge from another board. WTF is this junior high?

Like I said, why watch something that aggravates you so much, then come in to a thread and constantly whine when people don't agree with you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Wow! Okay. You do whatever you want, Sylph.

I honestly don't know how you will reply. I have no idea. I'm curious to find out. Just bear in mind that the longer you wait, the more opinions are going to be set about you, maybe even more than you're set about yours. People are going to look at you and think, no wonder he doesn't write for the soaps, he doesn't even have the fortitude to be able to accurately express himself without demeaning other people. There's no follow-through, no ability to close the deal as a writer or a theorist. People are going to say that if you can't even distinguish yourself as clear-headed, forward-thinking and articulate on a board of boring, generic, same-y lemmings, then how can you be expected to be listened to as a new voice of change? They're going to say that even though this board is generic, saccharine and full of happy-talk, your studied nihilism without substance or ability to articulate purpose makes you the most vapid and generic person here.

And I don't think you want to be seen that way. So take all the time you need, but remember, people want to hear you knock it out of the park. If your convictions are strong and your message is valid, then you should have no problem.

Personally? For me, the jury's still out on you. And a lot of other people feel the same, I'll bet. So you probably don't want to blow this. Nobody wants to look vapid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IA. I certainly can appreciate, too, how Maria and her team are building on previously established history, and not devising one for Kevin that doesn't jibe with all that we know about him and is just for the sake of one storyline. I wish they'd spent more time on Clint's brainwashing Kevin (if Papa Bell were writing, you know it would've lasted months); but, you know, whatev.

Actually, I tend to believe Adam is faking his blindness. Even if he isn't, though, there's no question in my mind that either he, or he and Estella, or even he, Estella and Rafe, are behind Ashley's "gaslighting".

How interesting would it be, too, if 1) Adam's blindness were permanent, and not conveniently reversed down the road b/c the writers are tired of writing for someone w/ a disability; and 2) he were a villain who just happened to be without sight? Frankly, the fact that we should be sympathetic toward him because he is blind, is an outmoded way of thinking in my book.

Word. If you ask me, I think the stuff that came after Kay and Esther's rescue was just a stall tactic, either b/c, they didn't know where to go after that; or b/c, they needed Kay to re-remember everything (and have her diagnosed w/ Lyme disease) at a specific time.

On the one hand, it is good. However, OTOH, I'm afraid it won't be like it was before, b/c they have had time to bond as (supposed) mother and daughter. Kay even remarked once, shortly after the truth was revealed, how she felt sorry for Jill, b/c her entire world was about to change. Seems to me like, no matter how ugly things will get from now on, one or the other always will hold back, if only a little; and that's no fun, lol.

Now, if Jill had gotten drunk after learning she was not really Kay's daughter, let's say, and she accidentally ran down and killed Murph with her car, that, I think, would've added sufficient fuel to restart the old fire. It also would've been a strange case of tit-for-tat; Kay's recklessness had cost Jill her love; and now, Jill's recklessness costs Kay hers.

I'll be happy just to see these people have a genuine storyline again (...and to see Thad Luckinbill half-naked).

Now, I agree with you about no one being portrayed favorably in this storyline; but, I sincerely doubt the writers know from one bed-hop to the next where to take it, or how it all will end. More so than your average Y&R male character, Nick, IMO, is flip-flopping way too much between Sharon and Phyllis. That kinda says to me one person wants the triangle to go one way, while another one wants it to go the other. Of course, YMMV.

Word to all that. If you want to label me racist, go ahead; but I'd rather have no Blacks on this show than ones as boring as these.

I think it's still early, and we haven't seen her enough, so I won't pass final judgment yet on CF as Mac. That said...? Yeah, I'm not feeling the chemistry between her and BM, either. I hope Y&R has not placed all their eggs in the Billy/Chloe/Mac basket, b/c this is one storyline (and triangle) I see going "bust" with the folks at home.

You are so not kidding. If I were Humphrey Bogart, I'd claw my way out of the grave just to lay the smackdown on those two.

No doubt, these two just aren't "clicking" for me either. Perhaps, it's time for the show to cut their losses where Eden is concerned?

As I've said before, though, in another thread (...I think; I have e-mail buddies I talk about the show with often), I am hard-pressed to name one young couple on Y&R who've risen above "mediocre". Even the original Billy & Mac, before all the WTF? recasts, were a couple I liked, but not necessarily loved. In fact, I think the only time where one could say Y&R had a great teen/young adult storyline at all was during the Danny/Lauren/Traci storyline -- and that probably was due more to the rivalry between Lauren and Traci than to Danny!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Ya, I thought I'd check back in now that the school year is over, and I recovered my password LoL.

I'm loving how Vee is putting Sylph on blast. It's so utterly delicious. I can just see him frantically googling various intelligent sources, trying to pass it off as his own knowledge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am just so tired of thinking about how bad Noah, Eden, Tyra, Ana, Lily, Cane and Colleen are. It takes so much out of you knowing that they aren't doing anything to sort out these mistakes. I can handle everyone else, even Gloria, but these few are just horrible, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LMAO! Yeah. One of the reasons why I wasn't going to reply was because Vee totally cooked this up as the best soap "on air" right now: he wants to ridicule me in front of everyone and offer good entertainment for all the Sylph haters (MTS, Ruckston and a whole platoon of other people). So he wasn't serious, he just likes to see me confirm his theory about me time and time again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Now, while I don't want to lose Murph for anything...this is an idea of such stunning brilliance, such incredibly good impact...I now want to see it done. Wow...THAT would motivate the feud, especially after the way that Jill has been talking about the worm-digger. I especially like the "symmetry" of your "drunken vehicular death". Awesome.

Again, the nail is hit on the head. The problem is not Noah. I'm sensing Kevin G. Schmidt might have chemistry with anyone. But the weak link is Eden...and it is just not working there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Marland was long gone by this point.  He quit in either August/September 1982. I think it was due to letting the actress play out her contract and use her for party scenes and/or scenes with Phillip/Justin.   I was surprised she was still on in June 1983 myself, because I figured she had been written out before Pam Long joined the writing staff. Thankfully, having episodes uploaded during this period on Spauldingfield YT site has helped to connect some of the dots.  It looks as though Pam Long starts the first week or so of May 1983.. and in those first few weeks: Morgan and Evie were both written off and Lillian/Mindy/Billy/Beth/Annabelle all come onto the show.    
    • @MaximThis really  old song popped into my head this morning .... 

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • For any military veterans and family: Military discount for *NEW* subscribers for any type of ParamountPlus subscription, "for the life of the subscription" (whatever that means). Includes: active duty, retirees, reservists and National Guard, veterans, dependents and spouses. Military veterans will receive 50% off new subscriptions (They have a verification process) https://help.paramountplus.com/s/article/Does-Paramount-offer-Military-discounts For existing subscribers, who would be eligible but haven't used the discount: (from the same paramount help link) Question: I’m an existing ParamountPlus subscriber in the military. How do I get the discount? Answer: To take advantage of the military discount offer*, you’ll first need to cancel your existing subscription, then re-subscribe to Paramount+ [at the verification link] on your desktop or mobile browser. During the signup process, your credentials will be verified to confirm your current status. Once you've been verified, your discount will be applied in the next billing cycle.
    • What a lovely gif!!!!!! @Maxim

      Please register in order to view this content

        @Maxim  
    • I didn’t find it that interesting

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I can't watch until later (Canada issues). What is Philip's motivation for stealing the drug? Only plot I cared about today and you did not mention it 
    • Doug III’s first day of work. Hope he does a good job… or that Tate tries to sabotage him somehow

      Please register in order to view this content

      His scenes with Holly were nice though. They’re sweet together and I understand why some people think that they have more chemistry than Tate/Holly do. And I liked that Doug III opened up to her about his past. Maybe that could lead to something good happening in the future.  I also enjoyed Roman and Kate, and how they’re both being tied into EJ’s shooting. The mystery of it all is really compelling. I don’t think Roman is the shooter though either.  I didn’t have much sympathy for Kristen though. She has no one to blame for Rachel’s problems than herself. But at the same time, I’m really surprised that Days actually remembered the Alex/Kristen fling. I thought Ron had erased that from existence. I’m not shipping them at all, but I’m definitely shipping a permanent end to Brady/Kristen but after today, I’m not so sure about that either.  And, Johnny and Chanel were still great together
    • https://parade.com/news/beyond-the-gates-actor-flexes-like-a-wrestler-in-viral-shirtless-photo
    • Some country club revelation thoughts from a casual watcher no one asked for. The Great: Daphnee Duplaix gave the best performance we've seen yet. Nicole's dialogue was also well thought out and felt character specific. TJ Maxx Ted was also pretty good. Trisha Mann-Grant steals every scene she's in. Often without even trying. Carrying multiple episodes worth of exposition heavy soap dialogue with starts and stops and recapping and drama and humor is no small feat and she nailed. Vernon telling Lesliana to STFU.  The Bad: So much of the dialogue for the rest of the cast was overly written. Martin said "You are a vile human being with a hole in your heart!". Marty, what are we doing? It's SO dramatic and sounds so silly coming from this grown man. Do Bill and Hayley do anything but talk about the Duprees? And the nerve of her to get so excited to find out Ted is a cheater when she and her husband are too. There should be a hint of shame mixed in with your glee, ma'am. The Questionable: Coffee and a rendition of Amazing Grace after finding out Nicole was betrayed by her husband. The Duprees are an odd bunch. The stinger of one segment had Anita prepared to lambast Lesliana, when we came back someone else was talking. When Anita eventually said something to Wig, it was a lukewarm at best. And then of course she thought singing a song about something that should absolutely not be extended to her son-in-law. The entire family allowing this deranged woman to speech at them in their own was...nuts. I know she said something about what would the neighbors say but my GOD. Is she just going to be allowed to trespass whenever she feels like it now? The focus on Leslie and her wig usage as an oddity is...odd. I think Chelsea said something like "and she wears wigs!" (while wearing a buss down middle part). Okay? It's just not that odd for a black woman to change up her hair. It's the different names that's the problem. I know it's meant to be humorous, in a throwback soap kind of way, but it fell flat for me.  I'm sorry I find the whole family to be WEIRD. It's like they want us to see them as ruthless yet benevolent, open yet furtive, snobbish yet tooth achingly sweet all at the same time. I cannot get a lock on the family dynamics. Everyone is just there.  I'm gonna cry if this show doesn't start giving us ages (or close to it!) for these characters. Because if Eva is 21-22 then Martin was being given crayons, a soda pop and blinders when he was 15-17 years old. Martin had to have been under 8 for me to buy this story, which would make Eva and Kat late 20s (Martin is at least 35 since he wants to run for president), which I don't think they're meant to be. It's honestly minor but it bothers me. I've mentioned this to @Vee but I think the optics on opening the show with both sisters discovering their husbands of over 30 years are cheaters should've been considered. I doubt there was any intention behind it, no one's rubbing their hands together as they scheme to say the married black men can't stay loyal but how does it look? Maybe it's just me. Honestly it's probably just me!
    • Thank you very much!!!! I really appreciate it!!! I also have read the GH coffee table book from the 90s!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy