Jump to content

B&B: Week of April 20, 2009


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I really thought she had potential. But if you actually watched Thursday's show -- objectively -- I can't defend her for another moment. It is NOT what was written. Watch her face, body language, tone of voice.

From an OBJECTIVE perspective, ask yourself if you see any real emotions there (other than "mildly p!ssed off", which is not appropriate when the love of your life just betrayed you). The dialogue ALSO sucked, but JMW did not rise above it...she was sucked into the hollow, soulless writing.

The plane scenes were engaging from a "cheese-tastic" perspective, I will acknowledge. But can you respect a show that does that all the time? Answer: Look at where it got Passions.

I am taping it nightly again, and watching it. I am as loyal as they come. Each day, I hope the show will find itself again.

I wonder when I'll finally lose hope?

In the meantime, I too miss "Papa Bell". Therein lies the secret, I think. Brad has to let go. Hold onto the EP reigns, and allow some fresh blood in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Okay, so the plane sh!t rocked. LOL. And here's why:

Was it cheesy? Absolutely! But I appreciate that B&B at least made an attempt to make the airplane chase somewhat serious, instead of some Soup parody. It's one thing to aim for laughs(i.e. "Not Gonna Happen Rrrrrrrick"). It's another for it to be pure camp.

The plane chase was classic B&B.

This show is damaged, yes. No question about it. But I appreciate it when B&B takes itself seriously, even if it does come off campy.

And does B&B finally have some kind of "B" story? With Owen/Jackie? I know I've been asleep at the wheel when watching this show, but I'm glad all this teasing with them finally went somewhere. I loved the dialogue between them before their sex, even if the bathtub in the living room was a lame, cost-cutting device to get Jackie's cherry popped.

And on a more shallow note, I see the wardrobe department learned from "Days of our Lives'" mistakes and put Brandon Beemer in black boxer briefs. But that didn't help anything if you saw Owen from the profile view. I think his junk should have it's own zip code.

Oh, and this one will make MarkH happy: I can admit that Shannon Bradley's Wednesday script didn't suck this week, like most of her scripts do. I'm not quick to call her the messiah, but her script was devoid of those corny pop culture references made by older characters and avoided using weird comparisons to dog meat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yes, I admit it. I watched every day this week, which means I was engaged.

You know what? Photobucket just deleted my pics of Beemer in white undies (Days) and now black undies (B&B). Indecent. Seriously!

The thing is, I'm not happy. I want this show to capture my heart. That's the problem though. I like the B&B that makes me feel (like when young Brooke had to watch Ridge marry Caroline, and Stephanie tortured her in the greenhouse with the fact that she'd never have Ridge again...we're talking OLD SCHOOL Bill Bell B&B)...not just smile. And I don't think Brad Bell has that vision.

That said, I'll take the camp if it is well acted (Down, Flannery). But "Sick" needs to go...and I see no signs that it will.

Kyle Lowder, though, is transforming his character into something I deeply admire. He's bad, soulless. But he really doesn't see that in himself. He is a totally vacuous, amoral phenomenon. That gets interesting to me. He's more than the "male Brooke"...though he's close. Literally, he heard himself say those awful things in the recording, and the actor's choice was ... he didn't see it as awful. He didn't see it as hurtful. He saw it as "all is fair in love and war". That is a BEAUTIFUL level of self-delusion. That makes me watch, to see how sick he can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

See, I'm not familiar with Bill Bell B&B. I've only seen the show in clips and edits from YouTube and the glory days of WoST.org.

I began watching the show on a regular basis shortly before Taylor was shot by Sheila. Maybe alot of you thought the show was ruined by then, but I loved and enjoyed the show for how fun these characters were and how deep the rivalry between these characters were. And I thought Brad Bell did a really good job of mining that history for years. But maybe I grew sick of the repetition like everyone else.

The thing is, is that if you've never watched B&B, all of this seems new to you. But almost a decade into watching and following B&B, alot of this seems like old hat.

My problem is that I don't think Lowder plays him sick and soulless enough. Or maybe the show isn't writing it that way? I can't figure it out.

I don't feel like Rick is ruthless and sick enough. But he's getting there.

I don't mean sick or evil like Todd on OLTL. But I want to see Rick truly unapologetic for being a bastard but at the same time, avoid playing a constant beat of "woe is me" and "desperation." It should be a motivation for the crap he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Photobucket sucks. Why else would someone want to use their crappy photosharing service? If someone wants to share photos of friends and family, they'd just use Facebook or e-mail them.

ETA: Hopefully the end of Rick and Steffy means the end of that crappy "De Beers" theme with the cheesy saxophone. I throw up in my mouth everytime I hear it!

ETAA: Taylor's plea to get Ridge back was pretty pathetic, but whatever. I still think she's infinitely better than Brooke. If that were Brooke in the same position, she would have had on the lingerie and the chocolate strawberries on the coffeetable, begging and wiggling and jiggling.

What a great week of shows. I'm just hoping this continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I haven't watched in ages (although I really tried) and haven't heard anything about Rocco's return. Wasn't he supposed to return for some reason? A storyline or something? From the recaps I have the impression he appeared once, said hi to Donna and was never mentioned again. :huh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Like with Jake McLaine, they seem to have brought him back as an extra.

I thought they might rebuild a Donna-Rocco-Katie triangle...but that is not in the cards...they have other plans for Donna.

So, seriously, there seems to be no point. Surprise, surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I'm a little surprised Rocco's return lasted this long. You know Bradley Bell and his infamous attention span.

The only thing Lowder can pull off is his shirt -- and that's why you often see him without one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.
    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
    • The other issue with Missy: in June 2020, she "liked" some social media posts by Candace Owens -- things Candace said that were against Black Lives Matter.  That is described here https://tvline.com/news/melissa-reeves-racism-days-of-our-lives-instagram-controversy-2894568/ I don't know if that was ever resolved.
    • She appeared onscreen not long after Rose Livingston and Sara Montaigne, and we found out that Sara was Rose's estranged daughter. I wonder whether Peggy might have been part of that family group -- or else they were just juggling a few different potential mysteries so that they could develop whatever seemed to be getting the best response from the audience. They didn't do anything much with Rose and Sara really either. Maybe Rose would have become more prominent if Rachel and Mac had split up over Mitch, or if Sara had really flourished. In some ways I can picture Cheryl being affected by MJ's prostitution similarly to how Josie was distressed by finding out about Sharlene. But I can also see that Josie as a Frame being involved with Matthew would have different stakes for Rachel and Sharlene than Cheryl being involved with Scott. I do think the solution for Cheryl would have had to be a badder boy than Scott -- either a real bad boy who would do her wrong, or the kind of bad boy (not Chad!!!) who is essentially misunderstood and other people just don't understand. Cheryl would also have been better off with some friends her own age. Matthew and Josie benefited a bit from having other teenagers to interact with.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy