Jump to content

Why you never got into the Bell soaps


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Why the hell would you devalue or bash the ABC lineup?

Each show is special and unique to it's viewers.

And besides, ABC soaps are not the issue here. The topic is "Why you never got into the Bell soaps." I just gave my answer as to why I can't be fully invested into one, but be totally committed to the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

There seems to be a lot of self congratulation in this thread. "Y&R is like the finest steak that can only be appreciated with a culinary education honed in the finest restaurants of Paris. By the way, I appreciate Y&R." " People who don't like Y&R just were brought up on on Hogan's Heroes and Room 222. I demured from those sitcoms opting instead for Upstairs, Downstairs and Alistair Cooke's America. Did I mention I like Y&R?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The funny thing I notice in regards to Y&R viewers is that a lot of them tend to be ABC and DAYS viewers as well. I think Y&R has a lot of casual viewers who watch because the slower pace allows them to come into a storyline and miss a few episodes without really missing too much of the important stuff. I think Y&R has more of these "casual" viewers than the other soaps. It might not be the preferred soap of most people who watch it, but they watch nonetheless for one reason or another.

Y&R (and B&B) despite their strong ratings in the US and popularity around the world have never had the insane rabid fanbases that the other soaps have. I think a lot of people see the Bell soaps as some weird type of comfort food, since very little of their identites, characters, and lush production values have changed or gone away with time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

LOL! Where's JP right now - because I'm channeling him again!

I don't think you'll find two soaps at more opposite ends of the spectrum than Y&R and DOOL - and I loved both for many, many years. I also acknowledge that they're for two very different parts of my brain. Doesn't make one better than the other. I don't understand why ABC fans are getting so defensive. I also watched ABC soaps for many years, and AMC was enjoyable for very different reasons than OLTL or GH.

And actually - if you want to talk about shows-with-egos, I present you General Hospital. For a long time, that whole Luke-and-Laura thing really made them think they were delivering high art. Some of them over there are still convinced of that. LOL!

These shows are cyclical. Nobody was comparing Y&R to filet mignon during "Out of the Ashes", that's for damn sure. In another year, who knows? ATWT could somehow be the Gold Standard, and then its fans will say so. And Y&R could be in permanent Chipmunk-Land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I think Cheryl was essentially replaced by Josie, and it seems likely that Lemay wanted to bring the Frames back into the picture and for a variety of reasons that it would be McKinnons who would make way for them. Cheryl didn't really get many layers -- she was pretty and kind and sweet and faded into the background so that Scott could participate in the AIDS storyline with Dawn. Looking at the AWHP, other than (not very) shockingly being in love with her mother's adopted son Scott, Cheryl apparently went out with Sam and flirted with much-too-old-for-her John Hudson and MJ's ex-boyfriend/pimp Chad. I know MJ told Mary that she had been a prostitute, but did she tell Cheryl and did she tell anyone about Chad's pimping?   
    • I feel the same way about Melissa Reeves' Jennifer. She just makes the show feel like home by her presence alone. I am perfectly okay with them coming in every once and awhile, which probably fits Reeves' schedule better anyway. They're connections to Salem are still there: JJ, the grandkids, Jack still owning half of The Spectator ... they're perfect recurring characters.
    • Hahaha. Jean Hackney, Angelica Nero, and the Falcon Crest henchwomen were all straight out of a James Bond movie.
    • My hunch is what you've described. JFP is likely back working on transitioning the show to a new studio and embracing new technology for its production model.
    • The woman who was the co-chair of Latinas for Trump is now complaining about his targeting immigrants that she thought were "safe." I also read a puff piece from yet another "insider" journalist who lives to normalize fascists - this one with a tech bro who was venting off the record because he thought voting for Trump was cool and would show up the Democrats and maybe we'd get Greenland, but now he's getting upset.  These people still support Trump, and Republicans, they just want to make sure they get credit for being respectable. And they will get it.
    • I really do wish someone could. Just a few characters in very simple backdrops, with very real problems that are just a little larger than life, like the '50s and '60s. All the characters having a level of dignity or respect. And their inner lives are what dominate the story, even if there are outside forces at play.
    • It's a lesson to never be loyal because once your use is up, you're shown the door. MSW was the only bright spot for CBS for awhile, and once they were back on top... they promptly sabotaged the show as a repayment for all that the show had done for the network.  
    • The show made a mistake in not bringing in more McKinnon kids, specifically bringing back Ben. Kathleen was leaving, and while I like you am very fond of Sally Spencer as MJ, that didn't seem to be a common view. They also decimated the character in a truly sick storyline. So that just left Cheryl. 
    • Between Gwen and Cat, the show often seems to side with those who cause lots of cruelty to Jack and Jennifer. I am half-surprised that the show hasn't brought Peter Blake back for more of the same.  I don't really know if there is a purpose for them in Salem now, but I do feel a sense of stability and rightness when Melissa Reeves is back in the role of Jennifer and back in the Horton house, in spite of...well, a lot of offcamera stuff we all know perfectly well. 
    • I like to call her an FC-reject character

      Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy