Jump to content

OLTL: Discussion for the week April 13


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I liked Tea's return because she was combative, she took no nonsense, her scenes with Todd were more about telling him to get himself together, even though she obviously still had feelings for him. Now they're back to Tea degrading herself for a sociopath, which I don't believe works as well as the degradation with Roger's Todd because she had much stronger chemistry with Roger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 129
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I did wonder if he and Natalie were going to compare bust sizes... but I admire that John Brotherton is fit and attractive without being nauseatingly ripped (like, say, Cameron Mathison)...

However, there is something that bugs me: Does ABC have some weird policy about "ZERO chest hair on shirtless scenes?" (Maybe it's called "The Mathison Clause!") Brotherton has a somewhat hairy chest that we can usually see around his collar... But the shirt comes off, and he's as smoothe as a baby's bottom - unless we're counting the heavily applied body make-up that was only minimally camouflaging the rash-marks left behind from the chest-waxing.

The same thing happened with Scott Clifton (Schuyler)... and on AMC, with Vincent Irizzary (David). I mean, I know we don't want the guys to look like Wildebeasts! But we can't just trim to look neater? Is it a given that no one in Pennsylvania has body hair?

Ok, my two cents... or two folicles. B)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Excellent points Harlemblues. A HW's job IS to find that happy balance. I also agree that every HW has had bad storylines, even the great Marland and Nixon. But the one thing I don’t understand with OLTL is the inconsistency. And by that I mean after the strike the show was on FIRE. The spoilers we were given from May right up till the Anniversary episode were spot on but after that spoilers hinted and commercials showed scenes of a Jess /Cris/Antonio redo but they never made it to our screens. Post Anniversary was a low point IMO. Then in November the show morphed again and was good right up to January and then it regressed back again. One thing I have to give RC credit for is his use of Vets, but the last couple of months have been newbie central, which doesn’t ring true to me. I think Frons is not only rejecting storylines but he’s dictating them as well. I think that maybe the reason why RC can’t find that happy medium. The storylines are not his ideas, so he doesn’t fully understand them or the characters motivation for their actions because there not planned out. It’s not his vision so he can’t relay the message down. When things are coming at you from left field and changing at the whims of others it’s hard to write good stories. If anyone is to blame, I’d lay it at FV’s feet. He needs to step up to bat and fight for his and his HW’s vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

HAHA I said it on the Hunks thread but I'll say it again--I think the soaps are behind the times when it comes to chest hair. It's true we haven't reverted back to the 70s--and I admit I have a thing for chest hair (prob cuz I'm fairly hairy and gave up long ago on the idea of waxing--) but with my generation and in fashion and eslewhere moderate chesthair (at least fiarly natural looking) is in. Yet the soaps (and not just the ABC ones though they, and NBC, seem to be the worse) still seem to FORCE their men to wax. Brody seems to be allowed to get away with VERY closely trimmed chest (yes I pay too much attention) and the older guys who aren't super fit and are rarely shown shirtless have they dont' seem to worry about but otherwise it's like a gay 80s porno and seems hopelessly out of date with what's "in" no to me. Even As the World turns the Z twin Zach had a shirtless scene and was smooth as a baby's butt and his website has TONS of shirtless pics of him in plays and natural family pics and he's almost as hairy as I am--so either the show told him or he did it himself--completely waxed for a 3 minute scene...

It actually really irks me but I don't like the completely waxed look at all it looks like a Ken doll to me.

I didn't remember an actual exit scene or mention but she must have--what a useless use of her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's called McTavish syndrome--at AMC during her last run everytime something happened peopel actually liked the majority ofpeople on here would suddenly claim they were sure Agnes Nixon or someone else was ghost writing LOL. Frons has had a heavy hand at least since when Malone and griffith were last writing and Griffith even SAID he left because of not beign allowed to tell the stories he wanted to tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Harlemblues AND you are both spot on i think (your comments go for AMC as well IMHO even though they haven'thad anyone as good as Carlavati for a while). A HW IS meant to strike that right balance between what they are told to write (or the kinds of things) and being able to do their own thing--but Frons is making that, it's obviously apparant, difficult for everyone. Really the role he does should be done by the EP but EPs under him have little power. I will disagree with you OLTL1, I don't think Valentini deserves much blame--the crew and cast seem to adore him, it seems Carlavati wouldn'thave even gotten his job or kept it without him and them getting along so well--sure he needs to step in more and defend his HWs (as do all the EPs at ABC right now under Frons) but I don't think he really objectively CAN. Frons won't let him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy