Jump to content

ATWT: April discussion


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 288
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I didn't even realize until yesterday that they were only introduced about two weeks ago. As you said, therein lies the problem. I personally like them, but the general audience probably doesn't care one way at all about them and this time next month, there will be no reason to care about them at all because they'll be gone, gone, gone.

Perils of Luciano :lol: :lol:

Noah and Zac in Luke's bed, with Luke downstairs...now that's what I want to see lol

I keep watching for the same reason I watch all the other soaps. I'm no fan of immense change, so even when a show sucks, I find comfort in turning it on and seeing Paul and Meg are still arguing over someone's kid, Carly is still trying to move heaven and earth to get back with Jack, and Lily is still Drama Queen Numero Uno de Oakdale. I want better stories and the show frustrates me at times, but their job is to entertain, I guess, and even when it's bad, I'm still entertained. Also, and I've said this time and time again, ATWT can be chock full of horridly-paced, redundant storylines, but somehow, in the middle of all that, they're able to put on a excellent episode every once in a while.

But that's just me, though. My standards are known to be low.

PS: When I was talking about wasted potential with Maddie/Noah/Luke, I kept thinking about this picture that I saw once, and it just illustrates to me everything that story could have and should have been, but wasn't. It's here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually Susan Dansby would have been great to be promoted to HW. She knows the history of the show better than anyone on the show now excluding Vivian Gundaker. Richard has been HW before at ATWT and did a better job than Passanante.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally, I disagree. Her scripts are nothing special. I think Levinson and Lisa Connor are their best SW's.

Whoever created the term "monster" for Noah... well, they need to be fired. :P

Are you talking about that Cheryl Davis woman? I saw an ep from her back in July-- she wrote the Cyndi Lauper one, actually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Lisa Connor isn't that great. Cheryl Davis has very little experience. She comes cheap since she is new. I wish they would have promoted Culliton. He at least has HW for ATWT in the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, she doesn't have much competition. I'm saying in comparison to the other writers, I think she is... one of the least bad?

I think Levinson has talent, especially given what he has to work with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The time codes on this board are wacky. I'm on CDT, and posted after 2, when GL was on.

Ugh...I think my eyes crossed so hard they hurt during that crappola. Like teenLily wasn't a headstrong, cut corners, "I'm goin' to Montega to save my sister! drama Queen. And don't get me started on rebelHolden, King of "beat them up first and ask questions later" school.

If Katie hadn't said something like "we've got six months to go before our ba-bee gets here, I would have thought Vienna would be dropping that kid next week! Seriously, it looked like they put Ewa in an outfit two sizes too small to make her boobs and tummy stick out even more.

I was completely confused during Luke's stuff. I couldn't make heads or tails of whether or not they're living together, if they'd had a fight...it was all like WTH??

It's weird....I loathe Nuke. I don't particularly like Olivia and Natalia on GL (seriously, I've never liked CC, and I think Jessica L is one of the most boring actors on that show)...but today I could not FF through that story, because it was a classic soap story, aside from the fact it featured two women. That's exactly the problem with Nuke---they do the worst kind of soapy stories---the cartoon villian threatening our heroic couple.

I doubt she'll ever go now that she's HW and doing breakdowns. TIIC won't be able to find anyone willing to do both jobs for one salary.

HEY....Susan Dansby ROCKS!!! (Okay....I think the last eppy she wrote sucked---I forget why I thought that though...) I think exactly the opposite...the SW saves this show. I think this show has the best dialogue on daytime. If you just listen to what the characters say (without judging the story, I mean) sometimes it's almost lyrical. It's hard to describe the impact. But maybe the fact I go from B&B from ATWT makes it even more pronounced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well, I definitely agree with you on the dialogue... in comparison to B&B, at least. How that show is consistantly #2 is BEYOND me.

"Save us from what?"

"Your own boring selves!"

and "Hey Monster." isn't all that lyrical, though. :P Definitely depends who's writing that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

UGH....listening to Janet makes me want to hurl. First she's lecturing Libby about how marriage isn't about "compromising your dreams", then she's all like "Parker's so possessive", as if the kid doesn't even have the right to ask Liberty where she is. (Okay, he's overpossessive, but Janet's such a freakin' hypocrite....she'd keep LibbyLou on a chain leash if she could...)

AS IF Janet hadn't "compromised" every one of her "dreams" about marriage to settle for a man she knows is still in love with Carly!!!!!!!!!!!!!

UGH...I didn't think I could hate anyone worse than Katie-on-crack-to-nail-Simon-and-Carly a few years ago, but Janet works every one of my last nerves with her idiocy. I can't wait until tomorrow, 'cause from the previews, it looks like Carly might just bitchslap her into next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Janet needs to STFU. NOW!!! OH, how I wish Craig hadn't stepped between her and Carly, because Carly was getting ready to bitchslap her. And Janet deserved it.

I actually felt bad for Parker today. Probably unpopular, but true. I loved the scenes between him and Jack.

Paul/Meg...snore. Seriously....isn't this just the Meg marries Craig to get what she wants story recycled?

LOL...KungFuDusty with his greasy locks flying through the air....hilarious!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • The last five or so episodes of season 8 after the Jean Hackney story ended were pretty strong with the Laura/Val friendship breakdown, Ben's PTSD with Val trying to help him, and the start of Jill realizing that Val was as much of a threat to her happiness with Gary as Abby was. I always thought that the Jean Hackney story should have ended at mid season at the latest... and then deal with the fall-out because seeing Ben/Val switch roles with Ben in mental decline instead of Val would have been interesting to explore.  And seeing Val and Laura's friendship suffer also was interesting and should have been explored especially with Karen caught in the middle and Abby both intrigued and amused at the conflict that she didn't cause. However, season 8 was the only Latham run season where Val was well written.  
    • Well, she's not in there sweeping the floors at the end of the night, and you don't bring in an award-winning producer to just sit on their backsides (or hey, maybe you do!). Again, without knowing the specific capacity she's in there working as⏤and it seems as if we are not going to at the present time⏤it's hard to speculate/discuss. I would interpret she's in a role that either would not require being credited, or she's, as others have speculated, is back and not receiving credit for the work she's done. That'd be like saying, per the WGA, all writers must be credited, but as we've seen by those who've worked as fi-core, they don't always receive credit. 

      Please register in order to view this content

       And, if my research is correct, per the DGA, you can request not to be credited for work you do. I could only assume the same would be for the PGA, as well.
    • When Anita read Barbara's letter, it started out with the viewers hearing it in Barbara's voice as Anita read silently. And then Anita saying the next portion aloud while Barbara's voice continued simultaneously. And then ending with Anita alone saying the last part aloud. Excerpt from interview  (link to full interview) The rest may be spoilerish -- Only the nonspoiler part here: I love the idea of reading that letter,” shares Tunie. “And at one point in the script, I think it said that my voice joined her, and [Anita] started reciting the letter from memory because [she] memorized this letter. I suggested to Steve Williford, our director, ‘What if it’s like that moment in Hamilton when Hamilton is writing the resignation letter to George Washington, and then he starts saying it too, and then Hamilton’s voice fades away, and then it’s all George. What if we do something like that?’ And he was like, ‘Oh, my God! I just got chills. Let’s do it!’ So, we did it.” I understood that it worked really well, so I’m really happy about that.”  
    • I think MVJ and Guza made a good team in the launching of the soap, and I'm hoping that the rotation of all stories and characters is maintained once he officially departs from the credits. And so far, Ron C's breakdowns have been decent... but they pop only when he's paired with a good script writer like Jazmin.   I hope once Guza leaves officially... that MVJ is able to reign in Ron C and the dread Jamey G.
    • I read that, but my interpretation was that she is uncredited because it is in a non-production capacity.  In others words, she's not secretly producing, or writing, as some had speculated prior to the confirmation. Her likeliest position would be in a post-production consultant capacity. I assume we agree on this?
    • Errol already confirmed she is back at Y&R and in a non-producing role; this alludes to she is not credited for the role she has.
    • I don't think Lisa served a purpose after the serial killer storyline. The writers never gave her anything to do but be Vicky's nemesis. Joanna Going deserved better. Another example of a character taking over the show and then the writers not having a longterm plan for the character.  Exhibit B: Sally Spencer. Such a missed opportunity. It really angers me how they misused her. She could sing and act and they just threw her away in that sexist nonsense storyline. Once the story was over, they wrote her off. The McKinnons should have lasted for years. I will give the show credit for how they introduced Sandra Ferguson as Amanda. I thought it was expertly done. She comes in and she immediately connected to RKK's Sam. She has chemistry with Matthew and she has realistic conversations with MAc and Rachel. That's how it is done. 
    • Great points, and it has not completely vanished. Leslie on Beyond the Gates fits the trope (she's still not over that Ted lovin' two decades later), though I will say there does seem to be an effort to make her more complex.
    • I understand why people speculate, but I have to say it doesn’t sound very plausible that Jill Farren Phelps would be working at Y&R in any uncredited role. CBS daytime shows are tightly bound by union contracts and corporate oversight, and that kind of informal arrangement would be a major liability in 2025. Before the mergers of SAG-AFTRA and the two WGA branches, it may have been easier to hire someone quietly or off the books. But those days are behind us. With digital payroll, tighter pension tracking, and increased scrutiny from legal and compliance departments, it’s just not the kind of thing anyone can get away with anymore. Most union members, especially producers nearing retirement, would not risk their eligibility or benefits to take an uncredited role. The Producers Guild of America is also very clear about crediting. To even receive the PGA mark, a producer has to be verified through a formal review process. According to their credit certification guidelines (source), "only individuals who performed a majority of the producing functions on a motion picture or television production" are eligible for credit, and those credits must be official and recorded. If someone is functioning in that capacity, they are not supposed to be uncredited. Studios that are union signatories, like CBS and Sony, know better than to skirt those rules. If anyone has a legitimate, primary source confirming that CBS is hiring someone like Phelps in an uncredited production role, I’d honestly be curious to read it. But without that, this just feels like rumor—not reality.
    • I keep thinking about the persistent trend of eroticizing mental illness on Guiding Light. Sonni and Annie were never more compelling, or more attractive to the show, than when they were manic. It played into a recurring theme: strong women undone by their unhinged reaction to sex. The writers were likely inspired by Basic Instinct and the broader wave of neo-noir films in the late '80s and early '90s, where female sexuality was often equated with instability. The result was a crude portrayal, not just of mental illness, but of womanhood itself. Both Sonni and Annie were introduced as sharp, capable women, brought in specifically as formidable antagonists to Reva. They were logical and composed, standing in contrast to Reva’s emotional volatility. That difference made them threatening, but not especially “sexy”—until desire became their undoing. In a very male fantasy, their strength unraveled the moment they slept with Joshua. As soon as they got a taste of Lewis lovin’, they spiraled into scheming lunatics, willing to torch everything to hold on to him. It was part of a larger trend in the culture. Fatal Attraction, Single White Female, and The Hand That Rocks the Cradle all traded on the idea that female desire was dangerous, barely held in check, and always teetering on the edge of madness. Looking back, it's a pretty grim trope. And while it's not completely vanished, I'm grateful we don't see it quite as often today.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy