Jump to content

OLTL: Thumbs DOWN


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I had a doctor's appointment this afternoon, and OLTL was on in the waiting room. The TV was above my head, so I listened to the show rather than watch. You don't realize how mind-numbingly awful and trite soap dialogue is (and I'm not singling out OLTL...that's just the show that was on) until you listen and not watch. It was embarrassing. It was a crowded waiting room, and people who were watching were actually laughing at the serious stuff. Personally, I've always loved soaps as an escape and in their defense, it is sometimes difficult to judge a show out of context, but there is a reason why they've always pretty much been the laughingstock of the entertainment industry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

OMG, I was home sick yesterday and watched B&B for the first time in ages. I was totally mesmerized by the atrocious acting and writing. It was absolutley hypnotic. I felt like I was watching a Saturday Night Live parody of soaps or even "Soapdish." Ronn Moss is really one of a kind, and not in a good way. He had some scenes with LaFlannery. Now I love her, but she was totally phoning it in. Then there's Hunter Tylo and that "actor" who plays her son. Just bad! It's essentially a bargan basement version of Y&R.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I have to say that I wholeheartedly agree with Carl about the David Vickers character.

I think OLTL appreciates the David Vickers character for all that Tuc Watkins brings to him, but I don't think they take the character seriously. He's a showhorse that they trot out every three months for a ratings bump (which may or may not actually happen), critical acclaim, and a few hollow laughs, that are great at the time, but do little for the development of story or the David Vickers character. Every time he DOES come back more cartoonish than when he last left, from his stints as a TV star, a fry cook at the Bon Jour, and most recently a Buddhist. OLTL is getting stuck in a trap now of trying to outdo themselves every time David returns to the canvas, that he's become so gimmicky that I can't connect to Tuc Watkins' performance like I once used to. I fully expect him to pop out of someone's oversized birthday cake next time in clownface and wearing a speedo with suspenders.

Ultimately, in all the drama OR the comedy, I hope to see some kind of character growth or at least a hint of character direction. David's been a Buchanan for QUITE a while now, but he didn't know he was, so I could forgive the fact that it wouldn't jar David out of the caricaturish slump he's been in, but now that he DOES know, and STILL remained a cartoon, essentially shrugging off the news of his true lineage and leaving town to "pursue his craft" (of acting) basically made no difference and provided no resolution to a story that's been building for... three years (counting Spencer Truman's introduction)?! I consider that a waste, and I enjoy David Vickers' actual SCENES, just not his arc.

For what it's worth, we did get basically one scene of David hoping to be a better person because he respects Bo and feels strongly about it now that he knows he's BO's son, rather than Asa's... and I'm glad we got that, but I have no idea where David formed his opinion about Bo, and I have no idea if we will EVER see the Bo/David relationship actually explored. So was it worth it? Certainly not yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How old is HBS, and would it be believable, I wonder, if she had a daughter who's near 40? Of course, I don't think the show had this in mind when they casted her, my greatest fear is that they simply wanted to de-age her, in order to pair her up with either Todd or John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Yeah, Rachel, Todd, Marty, Kevin, Zach and Powell were all in college together. Rachel might have been originally a year or two older than the rest.

The Cancer/Stacy storyline does seem rushed, but that's most likely to accomodate the availability of whichever past evil doer that's been stuntcast as Rex's father. However, the story wouldn't have been improved had the audience been subjected to months of the exploration Stacy's deep seated emotional reasons for her behavior.

As for David, no doubt two thirds of his return will be spent on flashbacks and jokes about him auditioning in Hollywood so Watkins can again mock the "Ghost Whisperer" (like he did with Branco) because he's still bitter that Jamie Kennedy beat him out for the sidekick role vacated by Jay Mohr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • I've seen so many posters over the years who are bright, creative, well-versed in soap history, and who care deeply about the integrity of the genre. I'd put the shows' chances in their hands a lot faster than I would allow any of the "usual suspects" to take control of the dramas they've already helped decimate. When I returned to university in the 1980s, I created a bible for a new soap and presented it in my screenwriting class. It was in reaction to how badly I saw the network shows being butchered at the time. The creative process was thrilling; a total joy, and I still smile when I remember the positive feedback I received from the professor and my fellow students. I was used to seeing written commentary from professors on my work. This one wrote me a long, complimentary note on the final page of the bible, but also graded it 97%, A+. I was beaming ear to ear for days!

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Thanks. I do wonder if Rose was meant to be more given the caliber of actress they hired. I remembered Sara and Peggy staying longer as they were still on when Soapnet started their repeats. I wonder if that was part of the reason they brought Jake's brother in. 
    • Speculation about Missy Reeves' potential evolution on basic civil rights doesn’t change my opinion of her. My view is shaped entirely by her public social media presence—which I find unpalatable—and I have no interest in learning more beyond that. I simply liked Jennifer’s hair and dress. That’s as far as my admiration goes.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Cheryl was gone before Lemay came back but I agree with your thinking that he would rather a character from a family he introduced to the show than a family he did not originate.  I remember reading somewhere in the early 90's probably after DS left as writer, their was an either a writer or a producer who made a comment that their intent was bring the McKinnon family back to AW.  Would have made sense for the newer viewers from the 80's.  Much like Lemay's attempt to bring the Frames back from his writing in the 70's in his 1988 return
    • DePriest left in January 1988. According to the AWHP, Rose last appeared nearly a year before in February 1987 while both Sara and Peggy appeared as late as October 1987.
    • Annie was not brought in as an antagonist for Reva. Reva wasn’t even on the canvas when Annie first appeared in late 1994. 
    • The speculation……….very entertaining. 
    • I had forgotten that several Days stars came out strong against Melissa. Good for them!
    • That would have made sense. Did all these characters get dropped when DePriest left or had they already been dropped?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy