Jump to content

OLTL Ups the Dramatic Stakes, But Do They Dare Fire Slezak?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

IMO OLTL right now has lost it spark but I have faith RC can bring that spark back. Every HW goes thorugh this process but I agree with most of you guys.

Alderson (Starr) is overrated. She sucks. From her annoying voice to her over the top crying...:rolleyes:

I love Farah Faith and I was glad when he was giving a SL for Gigi. I also want to see Erika featured more. The woman has won 6 Emmys! SHE IS OLTL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

Sorry, jinx, I see what you were saying. You're right, they've had the kids in danger stories on Agnes shows. I think beyond that point, what some may find distasteful is that these stories seem like they're all about plot device and sensationalism. Cole's drug addiction happened at the speed of light. So did the relationship between Starr and Schuyler.

Why can't these stories be told in a more leisurely manner, with less focus on these big shock value moments? I think that's what makes OLTL so difficult to process sometimes, because they never take the time to both build a story and explore the consequences of a story. Either things dawdle for months or years and then suddenly end, or things happen out of nowhere. It's frustrating because some of OLTL is so well written and so beautifully acted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

They're on cable, at shows like Damages, Leverage, Dexter and True Blood. Those are the new soaps.

As for Slezak, if this rumor comes to pass, it will freak out the online audience but the offliners won't realize she's actually gone for a while. Besides they can pay four newbies with her salary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Well frankly, I don't want the soaps to revert back to the socially conscious stories right now - not until they work on cleaning up some of the stuff that is wrong with soaps.

It is not that they can't do them justice because they could if they tried, but my question is how in the hell can you take it seriously when you have a serious socially relevant story in the midst of a return from the dead or some outlandish [!@#$%^&*] that can't ever happen.

Back when Agnes Nixon and others sought to raise the standards of soaps by rising them above the common dribble that inhabited soaps and tried to give them a conscious and respectability those stories worked. But they don't now. Soaps have no respect for themselves anymore so how in the world can they even try.

What amazes me is the cry for better stories and dealing with the fallout in a proper way but yet those same fans will cry for Dixie's death to be undone on AMC or any number of things.

It just doesn't make sense to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am of the opinion that soaps should not do socially conscious stories at all. TPTB and the audience have the attention spans of gnats. There is no tolerance for stories to play out in a meaningful or realistic way because everyone gets bored. Perhaps it is because these topics are covered by Oprah so we have heard it all before.

Dexter is my favorite television show, but it is the acting along with the writing that make it fascinating to watch. Michael C. Hall is a talent. I don't hold it against soaps for having some bad actors. It is hard to have a cast chock full of very talented people, but TPTB can do better in the casting dept. and they can use their cast more wisely when telling stories.

About Slezak, I want to believe that it is all rumor and that she is safe, but who saw the Martha Bryne and Don Diamont firing coming? More likely ABC will continue to phase out Vicki to avoid the uproar of that firing Slezak would cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Hard to believe, but I was about to rise to your defense. :P I recall that you were raving about the show when characters and performers you really admired and enjoyed were being featured.

I'm really not a Viki fan (much prefer Dorian) but when I hear the title of the show ONE LIFE TO LIVE, I think Viki is the "ONE" life. Unfortunately the show no longer treats Viki as it's center where other stories are an outgrowth of that center, and unless it does, I don't think it matters if she's on the show or not. Right now, her family is rarely featured. The reason I've watched the show for all these years is primarily because of the Buchanans, Lords and Cramers. Kevin's gone. Joey's gone. Jessica and Natalie are featured minimally in a second (or third) tier story. Cassie's gone. Kelly's gone. Adriana is gone. The remaining Cramer's all have stories but they're fractured and not connected with each other. Although, I think these stories are well written and capably performed, I'm not terribly entertained because I'm just not very interested in the Morascos, Thornhearts, McBain, or Montez's.

I hope it's cyclical, not strategic. I hope it's not a deliberate attempt to phase out the core families I've become invested in over the years. It wouldn't be the first time. The Buchanan's didn't start out as a core family. There are no Wolek's anymore. The show survived. But Viki was always the anchor and in some way the other characters tied back to her. No more. They need to change the name of the show. The Many Lives of Llanview or something. It's not the show I've been watching for so long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Actually she stated that while this was done in the past, the fact that doing two of these storylines at the same time is something new and that doing these types of storylines with no balance of anything lighter and or romantic maybe a turn off for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

You see I don't think RC writes for the actors per se, he writes for the characters, which what I think writers should do.

A prime example of this is the character of Alexandra Spaulding on Guiding Light and how differently they've written that character with each of their portrayers.

I don't think the stories are all that bad either, just the execution and yes the weakness of the actors carrying the stories. I'm sure if we had some strong actors in the whole Rex/Stacy/Gigi mess, alot more people would be enjoying the story than they are now with FF and CH. (I'm on the fence with JPL)

I don't want to believe that Viki is leaving OLTL. I truly don't believe RC would be a major fan of that (just as he wasn't of Tina's sudden exit), but then again we do have Frons and Valentini at the helm so with them who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Where daytime comes into play is viewers have a more strong reaction to a social issue when it happens to someone they feel like they know.

Like when Courtney on ATWT had bulimia. There wasn't a storyline where suddenly she started purging and then the next thing you know, she's in the hospital and the story is done. Her feelings of insecurity were slowly built up over a year and she began binging and purging.

The teens on OLTL are involved in such constant melodrama, they aren't relateable, they become a joke. The pacing of the stories lets the show down over and over. I feel like some of the stories, such as the aftermath of the Tarty sex and the motivations and pacing for the David/Buchanan storylines, are almost textbook examples of how not to pace a storyline.

I don't care if OLTL tells social issue stories, I just want them to learn how to tell a story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I love socially conscious stories but I don't think all soaps should do them. What I really wish is that the genre was healthy enough to support a variety of soaps. I wish there could be shows for those who like camp, topical drama, supernatural, teen drama, etc... There should be shows for Carlivatians, Malonians, Nixonians and Bellians. Unfortunately, one of the sad things about soaps is that they're all the same and all equally played out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I agree 5000% will all of this regarding OLTL.

As for YR, I think I kind of admire the suits for giving their long time (many, much older) audience members something entertaining. This story won't go on forever, and I don't enjoy it, but I don't mind it.

ANDREA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Marlena,

As always I appreciate your take on things, even as I respectfully disagree on a few points.

I don't think that the idea of someone living with a disability is nearly as hopeless or tragic as anyone, let alone a child, facing the possibility of dying from a terminal illness. That said, paralysis stories on soaps are usually bigger downers than terminal illness stories for me, because typically characters who are dying suddenly have big epiphanies about things that they (and usually all of their loved ones, who line up for deathbed advice) should have done years ago. Whereas characters faced with being paralyzed/blind/deaf typically act even dumber than they did previously, pushing away the people who love them because they think they are unlovable and a burden because of their disabilities. I'm actually surprised that

On another note, I personally would not put David and Dorian's infamous oral sex scene in the same category as any of the antics of this mind-boggling Stacey character. I read your initial reaction to the blow job scene and ultimately I disagreed, but I did not respond at the time because it seemed to me like such a throwaway scene that it wasn't worth arguing its merits with anyone. But it seems like you're still angry about it, so I am going to put my two cents in, not that I expect to change your mind but hear me out: I think a woman (let alone a woman of Dorian's age) being shown to have a pleasurable and empowering sex life with a gorgeous man she has been involved with and cared for (on and off) for almost fifteen years is a positive (and all too rare) thing on soaps these days. And yes, she was using sex to manipulate David, in part, but I think a lot of people use sex to manipulate their partner, at one time or another, to varying degrees. Dorian's motives in doing so with David were clearly established, rooted in a lot of on-screen history with him and with the Buchanans, and ultimately very human. Also I believe Robin Strasser, who has been playing Dorian since before I was born, has said in print that it was actually her idea. I'll trust her judgment.

Whereas I don't know what Stacey's motivation is, and what is more I don't care, and I doubt the actress knows or cares either. And the fact that we are being introduced to Stacey (ad nauseum) through this aspect of her personality makes it all very ugly to me. I would gladly take Dorian and David in a risque love scene any day. That said, I can't imagine that anyone directly involved in any aspect of putting this show out on a day-to-day basis actually relishes bringing Stacey to life for us. It's pretty clear to me that her instant frontburner status has been dictated by someone very far removed from the writing/production (and probably from reality). Was the actress so popular on GL to merit this fanfare? Did she even leave of her own volition after a full contract, or was she replaced with the acclaimed actress who has been playing Lizzie for years? I have not watched GL regularly in over a decade but I don't remember her lasting very long…

Finally, while I bet the highers up at ABC would sadly be all too happy

All of that notwithstanding…I can't say I'm watching regularly these days. I did see Friday's show, and a stabbing and a two-car crash was too much. It's clearly desperation. And despite what I said about the differences that I see between disabilities and terminal illness,

But a part of me hopes this breakneck pace works and that the 12-17 year olds they are targeting tune in. There are still more moments on this show that I like than on any other soap on the air these days, so the rumors that Carlivati is in the line of fire do not sit well with me. I don't think anybody is going to be able to do any better in the current climate at ABC, but I firmly believe a writer who doesn't care can and will do a lot more damage. In a few weeks, if I can tune into OLTL and see the characters I love doing interesting things, then I'm happy to just not watch Stacey and the serial killer and whatever else is happening in the mean time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • If the MAGAts were easy prey enough to get manipulated into voting for the tangerine-tinted terror, they'll fall for anything.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • And this came out as the "feud" and the media pushing the protests in Los Angeles got all the media attention. They know the press and the public will not care or can be manipulated into approving.

      Please register in order to view this content

    • Hope you will enjoy the 1976 storyline from the Daytime serial Newsletter. The show had just expanded to an hour so new characters and stories were required. The Soderbergs had been writing since late 73 and the show was still #1. Looking foward to comments and discusssion Pt.1  For over two decades As the World Turns has depicted the events in the lives of two Oakdale families: the wealthy and influential Lowells and the less affluent but equally respected Hughes family. Judge Lowell’s granddaughter Ellen is married now to Dr. David Stewart, whose adopted son, Dan, is actually her own illegitimate child. Dan was once married to Dr. Susan Stewart, by whom he has a daughter, Emily. Dan then married Liz, the ex-wife of his late brother Paul. Liz was the mother of Dan’s daughter Betsy, who believes to this day that Paul was her father. Liz died tragically the day after their wedding. Ellen and David have two daughters, Carolann (Annie) and Dawn (Dee), now of college age. Dan has recently fallen in love with Kim Dixon, who was about to divorce Dr. John Dixon until injuries suffered in a tornado caused amnesia and left her with no memory of her love for Dan. John is using this respite to solicitously convince Kim of his love for her. Nancy and Chris Hughes had three children: Bob, a doctor, Donald, an attorney, and Penny, who, after tragically losing two husbands due to automobile accidents, is now living in Europe, where she is married to a racing-car driver. Bob was married while very young to Lisa Miller, then a scheming and selfish young woman, whose machinations destroyed their marriage. She is the mother of Bob’s son, Tom, who is divorced from Carol, who is now married to Jay Stallings. Tom is currently married to Natalie Bannon. Bob later married model Sandy Wilson, a marriage which ended in divorce, and Sandy is now married to Norman Garrison, who is her partner in a beauty products concern. Norman blames Bob for Sandy’s  recent disillusionment with their marriage, and, ironically, Norman suffered a heart attack during his verbal assault on Bob at a Hughes family party; and while Bob rode with him in the ambulance to the hospital, Bob’s beloved wife, Jennifer, Kim’s sister, died in a car crash while driving home alone. Lisa, more mature and considerate of others now, is married to attorney Grant Colman, but her life has been complicated by the recent arrival in town of Grant’s ex-wife, Joyce, and the incredible news that she and Grant had a child after their separation, a child Joyce gave out for adoption but now wants to reclaim. Now the story continues... The picture has now come clear for attorney Grant Coiman. He has learned that his ex-wife Joyce neglected to tell him she had a child shortly after their divorce and had given the boy to Mary and Brian Ellison for adoption. Grant, after seeing the adoption papers and considering the boy’s interests, tells Mary he feels the child should remain with them; they are providing a fine, stable home for him. Grant’s wife, Lisa, is pleased with his decision, feeling he has thus closed the door to the past and they can now go on with their own lives. But Joyce has learned that attorney Dick Martin is now back in private practice, and she tells him she was confused when she gave Teddy up years ago and wants him to represent her in a custody action to get her son back. Dick tells Joyce she has a very weak case but he’ll do what he can. He goes out to Laramie to see the  Ellisons, upsetting them very much. Grant, meanwhile, has confided in Chris Hughes, his law partner, that while his name was on the consent form for the Ellisons’ adoption, he didn’t sign the papers; he had, in fact, never known that he had a son. But he’s afraid to open a new can of worms by signing a consent form now, as that would reveal that the adoption papers are not legally correct. Grant confides the situation to Lisa, explaining that if he wanted to,  he could probably get custody of Teddy himself, but that’s not what he feels would be best for the child. Mary Ellison finally breaks under the strain of Dick’s visit and tells Brian that Dr. Paulk, the doctor who arranged the adoption, told her he didn’t know where to find the baby’s father and so he signed the consent form himself. She painfully explains she kept this secret knowing that Brian wouldn’t go through with the adoption if he learned the papers weren’t legally sound. Brian quickly calls their family lawyer, Jerry Butler, who immediately phones Grant to be sure he backs the Ellisons’ claim. Dick realizes from Joyce’s story that Grant couldn’t have signed the papers and tells him he knows. The only person who has a right to file for Teddy’s custody now is Grant; he’s the only injured party. And the moment he files, Dick can sue for invalidation of the Ellisons’ adoption. Grant finally files, to settle the custody question once and for all, but technically he's filing for custody himself. Tom Hughes and Natalie Porter are married in a small, lovely ceremony at the home of his grandparents, Nancy and Chris Hughes. They honeymoon in the Southwest and return full of expectations of happiness. Natalie is disquieted, however, when flowers arrive which are not from her new husband. She covers by pretending to check with the florist and tells Tom it was a wrong delivery and they have told her she might as well keep them. But she knows who sent them. Natalie is upset when, shortly after, Luke Porter arrives in town and seeks her out. But Luke insists he is there only to assure her this is a final farewell and he has now decided to concentrate on. making his own marriage work. Sandy Garrison, Bob’s ex-wife, is working at the  bookstore to fill in for Natalie. Her estranged husband, Norman, recovering from a heart attack he suffered during a drunken confrontation with Bob at the Colonnade Room, is still telling anyone who will listen that Bob and Sandy are having an affair, but ironically will let only Bob care for him at the hospital. His recovery is hampered by his easily aroused temper. Norman anxiously tries to persuade Dr. John Dixon to convince Bob to swear he slipped at the restaurant, thus making them liable for a costly lawsuit, but John won’t do this. Chris discovers a large amount of money missing when checking the books on the Garrisons’ business, but doesn’t want to upset Sandy with this. More to come...
    • The cynical (i.e., the dominant) me has the very same thoughts.
    • Oh wow that’s pretty awesome! I wish I had  approached him but there was so many people 
    • In the current environment, while it's small, there is a crumb of good news: Apparently, San Antonio voted for a DEMOCRATIC mayor, Gina Ortiz, beating the "right-hand man" of Gov. Greg Abbott, former Texas Secretary of State Rolando Pablos. https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5337199-gina-ortiz-jones-wins-san-antonio/
    • Love this! You are both adorable. Wow
    • I have not gone back to watch much of 1987, but from what I've seen lately, it doesn't feel like the writers or producers had any sort of plan. The show feels as if it's constantly in flux.  I will give it credit for this. It's watchable for the most part minus Lisa/Jamie which I find nearly unwatchable now.   I don't find Cheryl mousy. I think she has a lot of quiet strength, but she was saddled with the Scott romance which the writers did not invest in. She had a good friendship with Julie (also criminally underused), and her interactions with Ada were enjoyable as well. I also like Layman, but Spencer was extremely talented and when Cass returns, Schnetzer and Spencer have some wonderful scenes. Spencer also fits in with Alexander, Hogan, and Marie.  I'd forgotten just how much I missed seeing Wallingford. IT was so good to see him again. Even when they didn't have a major plot, Felicia/Cass/Wallingford/Mitch always brings a smile to my face.  
    •   Dani’s cute ass party planner. He gave me some tea but I was so drunk I don’t remember it.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy