Jump to content

January 19-23, 2009


Toups

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I find it hilarious and amazing that many people online and on soap podcasts think that Y&R and OLTL are the soaps on TV while I feel that Y&R is stiff and OLTL is all over the place.

You know when soaps are in bad shape when people can't tell a good soap from the bad ones. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 94
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

AMC isn't bad, but it's not good either. I still get the "let's throw something against the wall and see what sticks" vibe that's been its hallmark since the baby switch ended three years ago. Pratt's writing is definitely slicker and more evenly paced than B&E and McTavish, but it's just the same old same old. What's more, Pratt's writing has no heart or warmth. It's all very cold and mechanical, and It seems less like AMC than ever. Say what you will about McTavish, and believe me I wouldn't wish her back as sole HW in a million years, but you always got the feeling she cared about the show and the characters, and that always shone through her shitty writing. As for Y&R, I'm starting to lose interest. The Kay storyline had me glued for a few weeks, but IMO it's been losing some of its momentum the last few weeks, and the rest of the show isn't strong or compelling enough to keep me watching. The P&G shows are just awful and unwatchable. As for GH, it's GH! It is what it is. I find OLTL just so overrated. Like the other ABC shows, it has Frons' agenda written all over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I am actually enjoying DH's stories with the exception of J&M's exit. IMO, DH is letting the character lead the plot instead of making the stories all about the plot. IMO, no one that watches Days can say Nicole is being written out of character to push the plot. It is so like Nicole to do the things she is doing to hold on to EJ. I know it's going to blow up in her face, but I am still enjoying the story, and looking forward to the fall out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some of us get called out for what are perceived as saying the same thing all the time.

***************************************

As I said before I think next weeks ratings will be pretty bad. So much of the plains, Indiana, and Kentucky and even parts of Tennessee have been without electricity for a good part of the week due to the ice storm. Of course it could be made up for by some of the ones who were out of work due to the weather too.

I know that some people find the stuff like OLTL of late to be boring but I eat it up. I love the character interactions and seeing characters sit around talking. I get to know the characters so much better and that means a lot to me. I really think Jessica's story has been so much better of late and a lot of it has been talking.

That 1.7 for OLTL & ATWT on Friday is a big ouch too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

MONDAY, JANUARY 19

1.(1) Y&R: Monday: 4.1/5,706,000 (+307,000)

2.(2) B&B: Monday: 2.8/3,934,000 (+263,000)

3.(4) GH: Monday: 2.4/3,189,000 (+325,000)

4.(3) DAYS: Monday: 2.2/3,186,000 (+20,000)

5.(5) ATWT: Monday: 2.2/3,072,000 (+330,000)

6.(7) AMC: Monday: 2.2/2,932,000 (+329,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Monday: 2.2/2,854,000 (+228,000)

8.(8) GL: Monday: 1.7/2,196,000 (+1,000)

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 21

1.(1) Y&R: Wednesday: 3.6/5,169,000 (-537,000)

2.(2) B&B: Wednesday: 2.5/3,308,000 (-626,000)

3.(4) DAYS: Wednesday: 2.2/2,959,000 (-227,000)

4.(3) GH: Wednesday: 2.2/2,746,000 (-443,000)

5.(6) AMC: Wednesday: 2.0/2,737,000 (-195,000)

6.(5) ATWT: Wednesday: 2.0/2,728,000 (-344,000)

7.(7) OLTL: Wednesday: 2.0/2,590,000 (-264,000)

8.(8) GL: Wednesday: 1.6/2,252,000 (+56,000)

THURSDAY, JANUARY 22

1.(1) Y&R: Thursday: 3.6/5,080,000 (-89,000)

2.(2) B&B: Thursday: 2.5/3,645,000 (+337,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Thursday: 2.1/2,802,000 (-157,000)

4.(4) GH: Thursday: 2.1/2,735,000 (-11,000)

5.(6) ATWT: Thursday: 1.8/2,520,000 (-208,000)

6.(7) OLTL: Thursday: 1.9/2,430,000 (-160,000)

7.(5) AMC: Thursday: 2.0/2,363,000 (-374,000)

8.(8) GL: Thursday: 1.4/1,805,000 (-447,000)

FRIDAY, JANUARY 23

1.(1) Y&R: Friday: 3.5/4,914,000 (-166,000)

2.(2) B&B: Friday: 2.4/3,437,000 (-208,000)

3.(3) DAYS: Friday: 2.2/3,008,000 (+206,000)

4.(5) ATWT: Friday: 1.7/2,431,000 (-89,000)

5.(4) GH: Friday: 1.8/2,414,000 (-321,000)

6.(7) AMC: Friday: 1.9/2,394,000 (+31,000)

7.(6) OLTL: Friday: 1.7/2,038,000 (-392,000)

8.(8) GL: Friday: 1.4/1,956,000 (+151,000)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Whoa! What is going on at OLTL?

The GL numbers were relatively good for the Otalia days, that is promising for TPTB keeping that story going.

Count me in the "good writers can get bad ratings" camp. I've seen it happen too many places that the bad stories like the slasher story on ATWT and stunts like ice storms get rewarded with better ratings than quality writing does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Good writers can definitely get bad ratings.

Look at William J. Bell on Y&R for the first 7 or 8 years when the show was really good and really popular with esp. the young crowd but they were not really big ratings grabbers.

Labine & Mayer were great writers and have many Emmys and awards to state it, but none of the shows they wrote for ever got great ratings.

Gordon Russell was one of the best writers that OLTL ever had. he penned the great Karen Wolek story but OLTL did not get great ratings then.

The Dobsons were also great writers but their shows never got great ratings. Even Douglas Marland never got great ratings for his shows except for when he was at GH. Often he was beaten by camp and stuff that was of less quality.

The opposite also works too. Bad writers also get bad ratings.

Look at Lynn Latham - she was really bad at Y&R but her ratings were often very good.

Look at ATWT in the 70's. Days and AW and The Doctors were often better than it. Even LOL during the Labine/Mayer years was better than ATWT in quality at the time - but ATWT stayed #1 even during the awful last tenure of Irna Phillips.

To look at ratings and qualify someone as a hack because the ratings stay stable or go down is not using logic. To use that logic then Lynn Latham and some other writers who got great ratings are better writers if you use ratings as a factor to determine a writers talent. If we are using ratings as a guage then Dena Higley must be a damn good writer since Days ratings are going up.

Ratings and quality do not go hand in hand at all. Occassionally they will equal out but it is very very rare.

Ratings often measure what fans enjoy and often that has nothing to do with whether it was good in quality or not.

You cannot say that Carvilati is a hack writer just because some viewers are not enjoying what is going on right now. You could state other reasons like what he does with characters, his breakdown, his dialogue, etc. but just using ratings is not a convincing enough argument.

When you use that again you have to go back to things like James Reilly who was evidently not the hack that some made him out to be because he brought Days gerat ratings during the last SSK story. All it meant was that viewers were interested in what was happening. It had nothing to do with his real talent as a writer or not.

Also you have to count out McTavish being a hack since in February of 2007 when she launched the Josh reveal ratings went up - so obviously that means that she is a talented writer and not a hack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think the theme and tone of a show affect viewers more than the talent of the headwriter.

Some of OLTL is just great right now. I'm more and more drawn into Jessica's struggles, even if I'm not sure about how they're writing Natalie. But how many people, after months of watching Todd physically and mentally scar his rape victim and traumatize his daughter, want to sit through months of methodical efforts to make sure Todd gets away with all his crimes? Or want to sit through a story which says if someone tries to commit suicide, that means they're a good person and should be forgiven crimes of rape, assault, baby-stealing? Are we supposed to feel sorry for Todd? Are we supposed to root for him?

I think viewers were willing to give AMC another chance, but even if some of the writing is strong, are people going to want to sit through months of Annie going through torment in a mental hospital, Krystal being drugged and used for sex (with her "friends" apparently believing she deserves to be drugged and used for sex because she cheated on Saint Tad), the Sonnyfication of Zach, Bianca having a child with Zach as he turns her girlfriend straight, Josh being gunned down as a vehicle to help push Bianca's fiance closer to turning straight and to drive up the angst for Kendall...no Adam to be found, a story which reduces Amanda to nothing more than her womb, little Emma burning herself thanks to Greenlee's neglicence, and Ryan telling Greenlee this proves what a good mother she is...

If people, especially when there's so much crap in the world today, don't want to sit through this constant sickness, who can blame them, no matter the quality of the writing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I gave up trying to figure out or guess waht viewers will sit through years ago. Some of the stuff that gets rave reviews from fans and high ratings often seems so strange and out there.

Some of the most damaging periods to certain shows have some of the highest rating periods.

Look at what Harding Lemay did to the basic structure of Another World - he made so many decisions that led to the final destruction of the show and were the key elements that set up the final elimination of the Matthews family who were the heart of the show. Yet that is considered Another World's golden age and it's highest rating period.

Look at the basic structural damage that Gloria Monty did to All My Children. She is the one who initially brought the mob to General Hospital and introduced the type of stories that ultimately set up them leaving the focus of the show's namesake. Plus she is the one that started the destruction of the older elements of the GH cast by backburnering the Hardy's and Jessie Brewer into almost relative obscurity. Yes he was GH's savior and the highest ratings period. Some of what she did was great, but she romanticized rape which set up the future stories like the one we just had with Todd and EJ raping Sami. She brought the out there stories to soaps with the Cassidines trying to freeze the world.

Look at James Reilly's first period on Days which was highly watched and regarded by fans. Much of what he did is what caused so many later problems for Days and soaps in general. His stories are what basically led to so many fans and critics disregarding Days. I was one who enjoyed a lot of it, but even I see the damage those type of stories did to Days in the long run.

It is a hard thing with ratings. Often what is lauded with good ratings is actually not good for the shows at all. Yet that is what pays the bills.

I do think some people equate too much into the ratings though and do judge them as quality. When all it boils down to is more of what people enjoy and are willing to watch.

It all boils down to what I have heard so often that look at how many people will stop at an accident or a train wreck and watch. There is nothing good about it but people can't help themselves but to watch and to watch in droves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I also don't understand what gets the ratings up. I try to keep in mind that during periods of OLTL I found downright shameful, like JFP's years in charge, or some of Higley's stories, the ratings were great.

I think the difference now with some of the soaps is viewers have sat through four, five, six or more years of torture, anguish, death, anti-heroes, propping, the same annoying characters hogging the airtime. At some time people say "Enough." And I think with AMC and OLTL right now, people were hoping and hoping for a change, for something more balanced, happier. Instead they're getting the same as they've already had for most of this decade.

I don't believe Y&R is a great show at the moment but the show is making a sharp move away from where they were for most of the past few years, and since the show is at least watchable and has some form of balance, viewers are responding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Cady had a fairly posh accent or manner as Rosanna - the character was a 180 from Dixie when she went to ATWT, and it was a huge success initially. As someone mostly only familiar with the nagging, miserable or clueless Dixie of the mid-late '90s and early 2000s it was what convinced me Cady could act. I thought she was incredible in her first run. Later, in future stints, her hair and story and performances were all over the place but a lot of that was down to the show for me. She brought some of Rosanna back with her to Dixie in her ill-fated return and a lot of people didn't like it, which I understood but I did think the character needed some change. I think she's had a little bit of the same persona and arch performance in every role she's played since, including Jennifer Horton at DAYS or Kelly at Y&R, who later became a maniac and was easily the worst work I've ever seen Cady do. It has kind of infected her overall mannerisms, I'll allow that, but I do think she brought Dixie back together as herself while still evolving the character when she returned to AMC again in 2012-13. Nonetheless, for me the upshot is that this is a character where Cady's kookier recent performance style suits the role. But I can understand it grating for people.
    • Yeah, Loretta Swit's passing stings. My late dad LOVED the show (he died last November) and watched it religiously. In first run and repeats.  And I was literally born the day after the show's premiere, so I grew up with it! I know many loved later, softer Margaret, but I loved Early Hot Lips. In real life, I'm all for less misogyny, but to me, the early years of M*A*S*H were just funnier. May Loretta Swit rest in peace. Thanks for all the memories connected to my dad!
    • FROM THE VAULT: WEEKLY DAYTIME NIELSEN RATINGS: WEEKS OF 10/29/73-11/2/73 & 11/5/73-11/9/73:  

      Please register in order to view this content

    • I agree that she isn't Dixie or Rosanna and shouldn't be acting like either. I just found it strange that she had a naive Southern character and a wealthy urbane character in the past and didn't experiment with accents before (unless I missed it, correct me if I'm wrong). She used to do improv characters on YouTube. She's probably doing something similar here.

      Please register in order to view this content

       
    • And here I thought I'd never think about Lauren Tewes again after her brief appearance in Twin Peaks Season 3.
    • I may be the single person who does not mind Transatlantic Campy Pamela. I think it perfectly suits this sort of Absolutely Fabulous-esque supporting character she's playing much more than it did when Cady tried weird and often broad stuff at AMC* or Y&R, or later stints at ATWT. She's not Dixie and she's not trying to be. I will freely admit some of the other chances she took at other shows often came off stiff, hammy or downright mortifying (Kelly Andrews, come on down). (* - and I say that as one of the few who was somewhat into Cady trying to make Dixie more cosmopolitan in the Rosanna Cabot mold in mid-2000s AMC, just to liven the character up again)
    • There’s absolutely nothing exciting happening storyline wise but I’m always happy to see the vets on my screen so I’ll take what I can get. It’s also just nice to see them all dressed up in the same room, it always gives classic Y&R vibes. The best part? No Phyllis. 
    • Please register in order to view this content

       
    • Well now we had Ashley's reaction-and weren't we all gasping when she appeared to hate it-but she was just joking!! She loved it. Now we have to see Abby's reaction, and maybe Mamie could come back to say she loves it. How about Jill via Zoom giving her opinion (she'll love it) and bring in a day player to play Mrs Martinez to say she loves it also... I feel bad to keep dumping on this show (not really) but when the choices they make are so inane, it's the only entertainment value the show has. Let's unpack the Nikki birthday story. So Claire wants to throw her Nana a birthday bash as away of endearing Kyle to Victor. Don't quite get the logic there,but OK. She hires a party planner who makes ridiculous suggestions. Slightly annoyed that Y&R are hiring someone for this role for 5 episodes when we never see doctors, co- workers etc. But OK to that to. With all the talk we are expecting something special. What we get is the Jazz Lounge hideously decorated with some ugly tablecloths and a few tacky decorations. They needed a planner for this? Then the guest list consists of family members (no grandchildren)and a few others. Hardly a party. As usual the costuming is pretty awful. A red and black theme ? And our guest of honor is sporting a do that looks like a cross between Cameron Diaz in Something about Mary and Marie from Roxette. They should have had an intimate dinner and ditched all the fanfare. Would have been way more believable.
    • Please register in order to view this content

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy